Suicidal Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not at all
- Probably no
- Somewhere in between
- Probably yes
- Extremely intense
- Not at all
- Rather no
- Moderately
- Rather yes
- Extremely
- Not at all
- Probably not
- Somewhat
- Probably yes
- Extremely
Suicidal Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People trying to make sense of intense suicidal distress may use the Suicidal Crisis Inventory-2 (SCI-2) Test to organize experiences that can be difficult to describe during a crisis. It is intended for a respondent who wants a structured picture of emotional pain, agitation, disconnection, hopelessness, and impaired control. As a suicidal crisis assessment, it can help identify patterns worth discussing and monitoring while keeping interpretation tied to current circumstances.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address emotional pain, thoughts, agitation, withdrawal, distrust, and entrapment. Scores gauge social disconnection, cognitive-control difficulty, and suicidal crisis indicators. SCI-2 presents six scales, including a summary scale:
- Social Alienation (0-20) measures isolation and detachment; Low 0-6, Moderate 7-13, High 14-20.
- Hyperarousal (0-52) measures nervousness and tension; Low 0-17, Moderate 18-34, High 35-52.
- Loss of Cognitive Control (0-44) measures thought and behavior regulation; Low 0-14, Moderate 15-29, High 30-44.
- Affective Disturbance (0-64) measures depression, anxiety, and irritability; Low 0-21, Moderate 22-43, High 44-64.
- Entrapment (0-40) measures dead-end feelings, hopelessness, and escape urgency; Low 0-13, Moderate 14-26, High 27-40.
- Suicidal Crisis Scale (0-220) summarizes severity; Below threshold 0-79, Elevated crisis indicators 80-220; 80 is the optimal high-risk cutoff.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Five ordered response choices move from not at all or probable absence through a middle option to probable presence or extreme intensity. Wording varies by item, but each response asks how strongly the experience applied.
The online crisis questionnaire organizes responses into the six displayed scale scores and crisis indicators. Higher values indicate greater intensity; supplied bands describe the profile, while item wording does not establish each answer's point value.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published SCI-2 (Bloch-Elkouby et al., 2021), but is a separate online presentation, not a documented adaptation. That study examined prospective suicidal outcomes at one-month follow-up; its findings do not validate this online scoring, which has no documented norms or standardization. Barzilay et al. (2020) examined near-term risk for suicide attempts with the SCI, while Bloch-Elkouby et al. (2020) used network analysis to examine the suicide crisis syndrome.
Self-report means that current circumstances, response bias, limited self-awareness, and changing distress can affect an online profile; scores describe reported experiences at completion.
- Bloch-Elkouby, S., Barzilay, S., Gorman, B. S., Lawrence, O. C., Rogers, M. L., Richards, J., Cohen, L. J., Johnson, B. N., & Galynker, I. (2021). The revised suicide crisis inventory (SCI-2): Validation and assessment of prospective suicidal outcomes at one month follow-up. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 1280-1291. 10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.048
- Barzilay, S., Assounga, K., Veras, J., Beaubian, C., Bloch-Elkouby, S., & Galynker, I. (2020). Assessment of near-term risk for suicide attempts using the suicide crisis inventory. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276, 183-190. 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.053
- Bloch-Elkouby, S., Gorman, B., Schuck, A., Barzilay, S., Calati, R., Cohen, L. J., Begum, F., & Galynker, I. (2020). The suicide crisis syndrome: A network analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 67(5), 595-607. 10.1037/cou0000423
Updated: