Vocational Interests Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- interact with many different people.
- make films, write books, draw, perform on stage, etc.
- do calculations; handle documentation.
- the opportunity to follow the author’s train of thought
- the artistic style and the author’s or director’s craft
- the plot and the characters’ actions
- a) for public service;
- b) in science;
- c) in the arts.
Vocational Interests Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering a study path, a new role, or a professional change can use this profile to examine which kinds of work feel engaging. The Vocational Interests Questionnaire Test offers a structured look at practical, creative, analytical, active, organizational, and interpersonal preferences. As a career interests test, it gives readers language for comparing work environments and deciding which directions deserve closer exploration.
What This Assessment Explores
This vocational interest assessment maps attraction to work tasks and settings, not competence. It suits people comparing study or career directions.
The six dimensions are:
- Planning and Economic Activities (0-12) measures organized, analytical interests; Low inclination 0-4, Moderate inclination 5-9, High inclination 10-12.
- Extreme Activities (0-12) measures interest in demanding, risk-related settings; Low 0-4, Moderate 5-9, High 10-12.
- Aesthetic Activities (0-12) measures creative and artistic interests; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-9, High 10-12.
- Manufacturing Work (0-12) measures technical, hands-on interests; Low 0-6, Moderate 7-9, High 10-12.
- Investigative Activities (0-12) measures scientific and analytical interests; Low 0-4, Moderate 5-9, High 10-12.
- Working With People (0-12) measures service, leadership, and teaching interests; Low 0-4, Moderate 5-9, High 10-12.
Higher bands indicate stronger stated attraction within an area; they do not demonstrate skill or guarantee fit.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents three alternatives representing contrasting preferences, such as working with people, investigating ideas, making or maintaining things, organizing information, creating, or seeking demanding conditions. The respondent chooses the option that best matches personal interest. This forced-choice format makes the profile comparative: a preference is recorded against the alternatives offered.
Responses are grouped by the questionnaire’s scoring key into domain totals. A higher result indicates more endorsed preferences in that direction, while a middle result may reflect mixed interests rather than indifference. As a career choice questionnaire, it is most useful when readers compare the profile with actual activities, preferred conditions, developing skills, and available opportunities.
Conceptually, the structure is consistent with the Jovaiša-Rezapkina Professional Inclinations Questionnaire and vocational-orientation work by Leonas Jovaiša and Galina Rezapkina. It is not presented as an adaptation or standardized reproduction of either source, and its online scoring display is not a normed assessment. Self-report results can shift with current experience, mood, and self-awareness, so this profile describes preferences without establishing ability or a final career choice.
- Rezapkina, Galina Vladimirovna. Selection into Specialized Classes. Moscow: Genesis, 2005. 124 pp. ISBN 5-98563-012-9.
- Jovaiša, Leonas. Problems of Vocational Orientation of Schoolchildren. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1983. 129 pp.
Updated: