Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine whether recurring experiences affect their sense of self, relationships, or behavior may use this questionnaire as a structured starting point. The Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI) Test presents a profile rather than reducing responses to one label. In this borderline personality test, answers are most informative when they reflect recurring patterns rather than only a particularly difficult day.
What This Assessment Explores
Items cover identity, relationship boundaries, unusual perceptions, dissociation-like experiences, impulsivity, self-harm, substance use, and behavioral shifts. The result shows which domains shape the profile for self-reflection.
The profile reflects patterns associated with borderline personality traits rather than defining a person.
The displayed dimensions and bands are:
- Total Score (0-51) reflects overall severity: Low 0-17; Moderate 18-34; High 35-51.
- Fear of Enmeshment (0-8) reflects fear of losing individuality: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-5; High 6-8.
- Impaired Reality Testing (0-5) reflects distorted reality evaluation: Low 0-1; Moderate 2-3; High 4-5.
- Primitive Defenses (0-8) reflects reliance on primitive defenses: Low use 0-2; Moderate use 3-5; High use 6-8.
- Identity Diffusion (0-10) reflects unstable self-definition: Clear identity 0-3; Some identity uncertainty 4-6; Marked identity diffusion 7-10.
- Cut-20 (0-20) estimates screening-level likelihood: Lower likelihood 0-9; Higher likelihood 10-20.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses use Yes/No self-report statements, and some items offer an additional response or follow-up choice. They are combined into the displayed dimensions, but the item-level scoring rule is not documented, so interpretation should follow the reported scales rather than an assumed formula.
Leichsenring’s Borderline Personality Inventory is the closest conceptual reference for this questionnaire. Chabrol’s 2004 factor-structure study adds context, while Kernberg’s model supports concepts such as identity diffusion and primitive defenses. The online version is not established as the published instrument or a validated adaptation, so these sources do not directly validate its scores.
The Cut-20 is an empirical borderline personality screening measure that lacks a theoretical foundation and is intended for adjunctive use; its result is a screening estimate rather than a diagnosis, while the catalogue bands are categories whose clinical interpretation has not been established for this questionnaire.
Self-report makes interpretation sensitive to current stress, self-awareness, and honesty about experiences. Comparing the dimensions with personal history and functioning can make the profile more meaningful, while a response pattern may reflect context as well as enduring tendencies.
- Leichsenring, F. (1999). Development and first results of the Borderline Personality Inventory: A self-report instrument for assessing borderline personality organization. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73(1), 45-63. 10.1207/S15327752JPA730104
- Chabrol, H., Montovany, A., Ducongé, E., Kallmeyer, A., Mullet, E., & Leichsenring, F. (2004). Factor Structure of the Borderline Personality Inventory in Adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 59-65. 10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.59
- Kernberg, O. F. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders: Psychotherapeutic Strategies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Updated: