Adult Helping Behavior Motives Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Once
- Rarely
- Often
- Very often
- Never
- Once
- Rarely
- Often
- Very often
- Never
- Once
- Rarely
- Often
- Very often
Adult Helping Behavior Motives Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
For adults reflecting on why they help, this questionnaire offers a structured way to examine the motives behind everyday prosocial choices. The Adult Helping Behavior Motives Questionnaire Test can help a respondent distinguish emotional relief, empathy, duty, belonging, and personal development within their own pattern. For self-reflection, this questionnaire clarifies recurring motives for helping others in daily life.
What This Assessment Explores
In this helping motives assessment, higher values show each reason's relevance. Dimensions are:
- Psychological Defense (6-30) shows helping eases negative emotions or enhances self-esteem; bands: Low 6-13, Moderate 14-23, High 24-30.
- Self-Actualization (6-30) shows whether helping supports growth and social-skill development; bands: Lower self-actualization motive 6-14, Moderate self-actualization motive 15-24, Higher self-actualization motive 25-30.
- Interpersonal Attraction (6-30) shows empathic, compassionate, benevolent helping and social tolerance; bands: Lower 6-15, Moderate 16-24, Higher 25-30.
- Social Adaptation (6-30) shows adaptation to group expectations, prioritizing collective welfare over personal interests; higher scores indicate duty and social responsibility; bands: Low 6-12, Moderate 13-22, High 23-30.
- Social Identification (6-30) shows helping shaped by internalized cultural norms and group values; bands: Low 6-12, Moderate 13-23, High 24-30.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each prompt describes a possible reason for helping, covering empathy, guilt, duty, approval, connection, and personal growth. Respondents rate how often each reason applies on a five-point frequency scale: Never, Once, Rarely, Often, or Very often. The response pattern is then organized into the five displayed motive scores; higher scores indicate stronger endorsement of the corresponding tendency, not better or worse helping.
The questionnaire about helping motives is conceptually consistent with the 2021 Helping Behavior Motives Questionnaire (Kislyakov & Shmeleva, 2021), but it is not a documented adaptation of that instrument, and its displayed bands are not established population norms. Batson’s account of altruism helps frame the distinction between concern for others and self-oriented outcomes, while Penner, Dovidio, Piliavin, and Schroeder’s multilevel account places prosocial action within personal, interpersonal, and social influences. These theories provide context for distinguishing other-oriented, self-oriented, and socially shaped reasons for helping.
They show which motives are more or less characteristic. Because responses are self-reported, current mood, social desirability, and self-awareness can influence the profile; interpret it alongside real-life context and, when needed, broader assessment.
- Kislyakov, Pavel A., and Elena A. Shmeleva. “Questionnaire of Motives of Helping Behavior in Adults.” Questions of Psychology, no. 1, 2021, pp. 145-156.
- Batson, C. Daniel. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
- Penner, Louis A., John F. Dovidio, Jane A. Piliavin, and David A. Schroeder. “Prosocial Behavior: Multilevel Perspectives.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 56, 2005, pp. 365-392. 10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
Updated: