Medication Adherence Assessment Questionnaire (MAS-12) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Medication Adherence Assessment Questionnaire (MAS-12) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people managing prescribed treatment, the Medication Adherence Assessment Questionnaire (MAS-12) Test examines practical adherence and the factors that support it. It considers whether medicines are taken as directed, whether concerns are discussed with clinicians, and whether treatment information is understood. This medication compliance questionnaire offers a structured starting point for reflection.
What This Assessment Measures
Statements address taking prescribed doses, independent stopping, understanding effects, reporting problems, treatment routines, and clinician communication. This medication adherence tool shows stronger or less established tendencies.
The displayed result types are:
- Agreement to Take Medication (2-10) measures willingness to take medicines as prescribed and modify lifestyle when necessary: Low consent 2-4; Moderate consent 5-7; High consent 8-10.
- Readiness to Receive Information (2-10) measures willingness to obtain and use medication information and participate actively in treatment: Low readiness 2-4; Moderate readiness 5-7; High readiness 8-10.
- Collaboration With Healthcare Providers (3-15) measures engagement with providers; Low collaboration 3-7, Moderate collaboration 8-11, High collaboration 12-15.
- Regimen Adherence (3-15) measures consistency in following the regimen; Low consistency 3-7, Moderate consistency 8-11, High consistency 12-15.
- Overall Medication Adherence Score (10-50) reflects total adherence; Low adherence 10-23, Moderate adherence 24-36, High adherence 37-50.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a five-point response from Never to Always. The self-report format asks respondents to describe recent routines, understanding, motivation, and communication. Responses are combined into the displayed subscales and total score; this questionnaire provides score ranges and result bands but no documented clinical cutoff rule.
The closest published reference is the 12-item Medication Adherence Scale (MAS-12), studied in Japanese patients with chronic disease and later adapted for a Russian-speaking diabetes sample. Reliability and validity evidence applies to that published instrument. This medication-taking assessment is conceptually consistent with it, but the online version has not been validated by those studies.
Results are best read as a structured snapshot, not a fixed personal trait. Higher values indicate more favorable adherence-related tendencies under the catalogue definitions. The published MAS-12 evidence does not establish population norms or standardization for this online questionnaire.
Self-report scores may shift with recent routines, side effects, access to medicines, memory, health changes, and comfort speaking openly. The result can highlight topics to review when considering how treatment is managed and discussed.
- Epishin VE, Kalashnikova MF, Likhodey NV, Bondareva IB, Kaurova AM, Tulupova MV, Nikolaev NA, Fadeev VV. Adaptation of the 12-item medication adherence scale (the Questionnaire for assessment of adherence to Medication) on a Russian-speaking sample of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Problems of Endocrinology. 2024;70(4):32-43. 10.14341/probl13372
- Ueno H, Yamazaki Y, Yonekura Y, Park MJ, Ishikawa H, Kiuchi T. Reliability and validity of a 12-item medication adherence scale for patients with chronic disease in Japan. BMC Health Services Research. 2018;18(1):592. 10.1186/s12913-018-3380-7
Updated: