Eating Behavior Questionnaire (EEV) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Eating Behavior Questionnaire (EEV) Test - Description and methodology of the test
For people seeking a structured view of everyday eating patterns, the Eating Behavior Questionnaire (EEV) Test shows how responses form a three-part result profile. An EEV questionnaire profile can reveal whether one tendency stands out or several appear together. This format helps readers decide which habits or situations deserve closer attention.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than measuring intake alone, the assessment asks whether eating is connected with weight control, negative feelings, or food cues. The questions examine deliberate food control alongside emotional and external-cue eating, so this eating habits questionnaire addresses everyday behaviors and the situations that precede them.
The three result dimensions are:
- Dietary Restraint (0-10) shows deliberate food control for weight; bands are Low restriction (0-3), Moderate restriction (4-6), and High restriction (7-10).
- Emotional Eating (EE) (0-10) shows eating linked with negative emotion; bands are Low emotional eating (0-3), Moderate emotional eating (4-6), and High emotional eating (7-10).
- External Eating (0-10) shows response to visible, scented, or social food cues; bands are Low cue-reactivity (0-3), Moderate cue-reactivity (4-6), and High cue-reactivity (7-10).
These dimensions can coexist, so the profile highlights different influences rather than judging eating as simply healthy or unhealthy.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item is a brief statement answered Yes or No. The questionnaire presents three separate scale results, so the profile distinguishes restraint from eating linked with emotion or environmental cues. As an eating behavior assessment, it presents reported tendencies rather than one overall judgment.
The closest source is FEV-II, a self-report inventory for eating behavior. Its structure is conceptually consistent with the DEBQ described by van Strien and colleagues, which distinguishes restrained, emotional, and external eating; this online questionnaire is not the published DEBQ. Nagl and colleagues' German DEBQ study provides psychometric and population-norm evidence for that version, but those findings do not automatically standardize this form.
Interpretation should stay close to the situations covered by the items. Current mood, memory, social context, and willingness to answer candidly can influence self-report. The displayed bands are catalogue interpretations, not established clinical cutoffs, so results are best used to identify patterns for reflection rather than label a disorder.
- Grunert, S. C. (1989). An inventory for assessing self-reports on eating behavior. Diagnostica, 35(2), 167-179.
- van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295-315. 10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T
- Nagl, M., Hilbert, A., de Zwaan, M., Braehler, E., & Kersting, A. (2016). The German version of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire: Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and population-based norms. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e0162510. 10.1371/journal.pone.0162510
Updated: