Structural Profile Inventory (SPI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neutral
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neutral
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Completely disagree
- Disagree
- Partly disagree
- Neutral
- Partly agree
- Agree
- Completely agree
Structural Profile Inventory (SPI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want a structured way to reflect on how they think, feel, act, and relate to others may find the Structural Profile Inventory (SPI) Test useful. It offers a broad view of personality organization rather than a label for one isolated trait. As a personality structure assessment, it can help identify recurring tendencies, personal resources, and themes worth exploring in everyday life.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions cover internal experience, action patterns, bodily awareness, and relationships, so the result suits someone seeking a rounded self-description. The SPI personality profile brings these tendencies together rather than reducing personality to one isolated trait.
The items represent these broad dimensions:
- Planning and reflection indicate foresight and deliberate action.
- Imagination and sensory awareness cover imagery and perception.
- Emotional experience reflects feeling intensity and stability.
- Activity and vitality describe energy and busyness.
- Sociability and relationships show connection and friendship.
- Self-care reflects rest, bodily care, and habits.
Results are shown on one overall scale, Structural Profile Inventory: 0-100. Less pronounced profile patterns are 0-39, Moderately pronounced profile patterns are 40-69, and Strongly pronounced profile patterns are 70-100. The bands describe profile prominence, not a fixed identity.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a seven-point agreement scale, from strong disagreement to strong agreement. Items address thoughts, feelings, habits, energy, perception, and relationships; the respondent selects the option that best matches usual experience. The result is displayed as one overall score, but exact item weights or reverse-scoring steps should not be inferred from the range alone.
The methodology connects with the Structural Profile Inventory (SPI), the instrument described by Arlene A. Landes, and Steven M. Herman’s validity demonstration using the Vocational Preference Inventory. Lazarus’s multimodal framework adds context by viewing psychological functioning across interacting areas rather than one narrow trait. This online questionnaire asks about personality structure and psychological functioning and is conceptually consistent with the published Structural Profile Inventory and related validity study; it has no stated norms or standardization beyond the displayed score bands.
For this psychological functioning assessment, the result is descriptive: a higher band means a more pronounced combined pattern within this scoring system, not equal strength across every trait. Self-report may shift with mood, circumstances, wording interpretation, and self-awareness, so the profile is a starting point for reflection rather than a clinical diagnosis.
- Landes, Arlene A. (1991). Development of the Structural Profile Inventory. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 9(2), 123-141.
- Herman, Steven M. (1992). A Demonstration of the Validity of the Multimodal Structural Profile Inventory Through a Correlation with the Vocational Preference Inventory. Psychotherapy in Private Practice, 11(3), 71-80. 10.1300/J294v11n03_12
- Lazarus, Arnold A. (1981). The Practice of Multimodal Therapy: Systematic, Comprehensive, and Effective Psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Updated: