Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
moral

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test

Take the online Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how athletes view honesty, fair wins, and aggression in sport in about 4 minutes. Quick 20 items that support coaching, reduce conflicts, and strengthen ethical team culture.
Start Online Test
Questions: 204 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
26,113 views
2,124 completions
1,731 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
11/30
Rejection of Aggressive Behavior (RoAB)
Measures how strongly an athlete rejects unsportsmanlike aggressive behavior aimed at unsettling an opponent.
Low rejection
Moderate rejection
High rejection
613: Low rejection | 1422: Moderate rejection | 2330: High rejection
A score of 11 falls in the Low rejection range, suggesting comparatively higher tolerance for aggressive tactics in competition than athletes with higher scores.
example score
17/25
Orientation Toward Fair Victory (OTFV)
Measures the extent to which an athlete values winning through effort and rules rather than at any cost, and can accept defeat with dignity.
Low
Moderate
High
512: Low | 1319: Moderate | 2025: High
A score of 17 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally fair-play orientation with occasional variability in prioritizing an honest victory under competitive pressure.
example score
21/35
Rejection of Cheating (RoC)
Measures how strongly an athlete rejects cheating and rule violations as acceptable ways to win.
Low rejection
Moderate rejection
High rejection
716: Low rejection | 1725: Moderate rejection | 2635: High rejection
A score of 21 indicates a moderate rejection of cheating, suggesting the athlete generally prefers fair play but may be somewhat flexible in certain competitive situations.
example score
86/100
Total Score (TS)
This scale reflects the overall tendency to make morally oriented decisions in sport, including rejecting cheating and aggression while valuing fair victory.
Lower moral orientation
Moderate moral orientation
High moral orientation
2056: Lower moral orientation | 5781: Moderate moral orientation | 82100: High moral orientation
A score of 86 falls in the High moral orientation range, suggesting a strong preference for fair play and rejection of cheating and aggressive behavior in competitive situations.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Youth competitive athletes
41%OF USERS
Teen and young adult athletes take it to understand their views on cheating, aggression, and fair play before important competitions.
Coaches and team staff
34%OF USERS
Coaches use it to spot ethical risk areas in a squad and shape training rules that reinforce honest, respectful competition.
Sports psychologists and educators
25%OF USERS
Psychologists and instructors use it for quick screening and to plan discussions or interventions around moral choices in sport.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Rejection of aggressive behavior (Roab)
Rejection of aggressive behavior (Roab)
Average
19.8
Normal range
15.823.8
min.
6
max.
30
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Orientation Towards an Honest Victory (OTaHV)
Orientation Towards an Honest Victory (OTaHV)
Average
19.3
Normal range
16.222.3
min.
5
max.
25
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Rejection of deception (Rod)
Rejection of deception (Rod)
Average
24.9
Normal range
20.229.6
min.
7
max.
35
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Final score (Fs)
Final score (Fs)
Average
50.4
Normal range
37.663.3
min.
20
max.
100
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Unsure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Questionnaire on Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sports Test

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test - Symptoms and Signs

moral
decision making
sport

This questionnaire is designed to assess athletes’ attitudes toward moral decision-making in sport contexts. The Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire provides a brief self-report snapshot of how respondents evaluate ethical issues that may arise during competition.

The measure includes 20 items and takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items typically query perspectives on honesty, rule adherence, deception, and aggressive conduct in sport settings, supporting a structured description of the respondent’s moral attitudes.

The Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire is commonly used to inform clinical and applied sport psychology discussions, including values-based coaching, team culture, and interventions aimed at reducing harmful or unsporting behavior. It is attributed to Darcia Narvaez.

Author: Darcia Narvaez, James Rest, Mark R. Leary
Literature: Shields, D. L., & Bredemeier, B. J. Moral development and behavior in sport. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology. Human Kinetics. 2008.; Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. Development of the attitudes to moral decision-making in youth sport questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2007.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment