Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
moral

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test

Take the online Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for personal reflection, the Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test is a 20-question self-report completed in about four minutes. It explores your views on cheating, fair play, provocation, and winning, helping you recognize your response profile and reflect on ethical conduct in competitive situations.
Questions: 204 minutes
Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
30,951 view
2,586 completions
2,125 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,125 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Rejection of Aggressive BehaviorRoAB
Measures how strongly an athlete rejects unsportsmanlike aggressive behavior aimed at unsettling an opponent.
example score11/30
11/30Low rejectionexample score
6 – 13Low rejection
14 – 22Moderate rejection
23 – 30High rejection
A score of 11 falls in the Low rejection range, suggesting comparatively higher tolerance for aggressive tactics in competition than athletes with higher scores.
Orientation Toward Fair VictoryOTFV
Measures the extent to which an athlete values winning through effort and rules rather than at any cost, and can accept defeat with dignity.
example score17/25
17/25Moderateexample score
5 – 12Low
13 – 19Moderate
20 – 25High
A score of 17 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally fair-play orientation with occasional variability in prioritizing an honest victory under competitive pressure.
Rejection of CheatingRoC
Measures how strongly an athlete rejects cheating and rule violations as acceptable ways to win.
example score21/35
21/35Moderate rejectionexample score
7 – 16Low rejection
17 – 25Moderate rejection
26 – 35High rejection
A score of 21 indicates a moderate rejection of cheating, suggesting the athlete generally prefers fair play but may be somewhat flexible in certain competitive situations.
Total ScoreTS
This scale reflects the overall tendency to make morally oriented decisions in sport, including rejecting cheating and aggression while valuing fair victory.
example score86/100
86/100High moral orientationexample score
20 – 56Lower moral orientation
57 – 81Moderate moral orientation
82 – 100High moral orientation
A score of 86 falls in the High moral orientation range, suggesting a strong preference for fair play and rejection of cheating and aggressive behavior in competitive situations.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Youth competitive athletes
41%OF USERS
Teen and young adult athletes take it to understand their views on cheating, aggression, and fair play before important competitions.
Coaches and team staff
34%OF USERS
Coaches use it to spot ethical risk areas in a squad and shape training rules that reinforce honest, respectful competition.
Sports psychologists and educators
25%OF USERS
Psychologists and instructors use it for quick screening and to plan discussions or interventions around moral choices in sport.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Rejection of aggressive behaviorRoab
You?
Average19.8
Typical rangeTypical15.8 – 23.8
Possible6 – 30
Orientation Towards an Honest VictoryOTaHV
You?
Average19.3
Typical rangeTypical16.2 – 22.3
Possible5 – 25
Rejection of deceptionRod
You?
Average24.9
Typical rangeTypical20.2 – 29.6
Possible7 – 35
Final scoreFs
You?
Average50.4
Typical rangeTypical37.6 – 63.3
Possible20 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Unsure
    • Somewhat agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree more than disagree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

moral
decision making
sport

People who want to examine their competitive values may find the Attitudes Toward Moral Decision-Making in Sport Questionnaire Test useful for evaluating how they weigh ethical choices in competition. This moral decision-making in sport test examines attitudes toward rules, opponents, winning, and losing. Its result helps readers evaluate whether their stated standards emphasize fair play, respect for opponents, and acceptance of loss.

What This Assessment Explores

Competition reveals how people balance rules, opponents, and outcomes. The assessment examines cheating, fair victory, dignified loss, and provocation. It suits anyone considering ethics. As a sports ethics questionnaire, it describes ethical tendencies.

The displayed result covers four dimensions:

  • Rejection of Aggressive Behavior (6-30) measures disapproval of unsportsmanlike actions intended to provoke or upset an opponent: Low rejection 6-13; Moderate rejection 14-22; High rejection 23-30.
  • Orientation Toward Fair Victory (5-25) measures endorsement of winning through fair play, rejection of winning at any cost, and ability to lose with dignity: Low 5-12; Moderate 13-19; High 20-25.
  • Rejection of Cheating (7-35) measures disapproval of violating rules to win: Low rejection 7-16; Moderate rejection 17-25; High rejection 26-35.
  • Total Score (20-100) means higher scores indicate a greater tendency toward moral decision-making in sport: Lower moral orientation 20-56; Moderate moral orientation 57-81; High moral orientation 82-100.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement offers five response options, with an unsure or hard-to-say midpoint and agreement or disagreement labels; this format is not a standard ordered continuum. The items cover cheating, winning and losing, fair play, and attempts to unsettle opponents. Results show three subscale scores and a total, but the questionnaire does not specify how items are calculated.

AMDYSQ is the closest published instrument, measuring moral decision-making attitudes in youth sport. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with it and AMDYSQ-2 work by Whitehead and Ntoumanis, but is not a direct reproduction; those studies support comparison rather than independently validating this questionnaire. Related research links moral attitudes with values and achievement orientations. Results from the fair play attitude test show how strongly respondents endorse ethical victory standards in this self-report.

Interpret the profile as a snapshot of attitudes in situations represented by the items. Higher total scores indicate a greater tendency toward moral decision-making in sport. The displayed bands are descriptive ranges, not clinical cutoffs or population norms; responses vary with honesty, self-awareness, and current competitive context.

Author: Darcia Narvaez, James Rest, Mark R. Leary
Literature:
  • Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Development of the Attitudes to Moral Decision-making in Youth Sport Questionnaire (AMDYSQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 369-392. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.12.002
  • Whitehead, J., & Ntoumanis, N. (2013). Further use of AMDYSQ and the development of AMDYSQ-2. In J. Whitehead, H. Telfer, & J. Lambert (Eds.), Values in Youth Sport and Physical Education (pp. 230-237). Routledge.
  • Lee, M. J., Whitehead, J., Ntoumanis, N., & Hatzigeorgiadis, A. (2008). Relationships Among Values, Achievement Orientations, and Attitudes in Youth Sport. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(5), 588-610. 10.1123/jsep.30.5.588

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment