Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
financial behavior

Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test

Take the online Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In six minutes, the Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test presents 29 statements about beliefs, concerns, expectations, privacy, status, and avoidance around money. Your profile highlights patterns such as financial caution, privacy concerns, status concerns, or money-focused expectations, offering a practical starting point for self-reflection and more mindful financial decisions.
Questions: 296 minutes
Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
36,516 views
2,737 completions
2,298 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,298 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Money VigilanceMV
Measures how vigilant and cautious a person is about money, including privacy about finances and distrust of financial institutions.
example score3/6
3/6Moderate vigilanceexample score
1 – 2.86Low vigilance
2.87 – 4.53Moderate vigilance
4.54 – 6High vigilance
A score of 3 falls in the moderate range, suggesting a balanced level of caution and privacy about money without strong fear-driven guarding of finances.
Money WorshipMW
Measures the extent to which a person believes money can solve problems and tends toward hoarding or money-centered thinking.
example score4/6
4/6Moderateexample score
1 – 2.89Low
2.9 – 4.6Moderate
4.61 – 6High
A score of 4 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency to view money as a key solution and to hold onto it for security.
Money as StatusMaS
Measures the extent to which a person links money with social status and judges themselves or others based on financial standing.
example score4/6
4/6Highexample score
1 – 1.58Low
1.59 – 3.01Moderate
3.02 – 6High
A score of 4 falls in the High range, suggesting you relatively often view money as a marker of status and may place more importance on financial standing in evaluations and decisions.
Money AvoidanceMA
Measures the tendency to avoid dealing with money and to hesitate to spend even on necessary purchases.
example score3/6
3/6High avoidanceexample score
1 – 1.58Low avoidance
1.59 – 2.85Moderate avoidance
2.86 – 6High avoidance
A score of 3 falls in the High avoidance range, suggesting a stronger tendency to sidestep money-related decisions and feel reluctant to spend, even when spending may be necessary.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Personal finance self-improvers
41%OF USERS
People who want to understand why they save, spend, or avoid money decisions and build healthier financial habits.
Couples with money tension
34%OF USERS
Partners who argue about budgeting, spending, or debts and want a clearer picture of each person’s money beliefs.
Coaches and therapists
25%OF USERS
Professionals who work with clients on stress, self-esteem, or behavior change and need a quick profile of money attitudes.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Worrying About MoneyWAM
You?
Average3.2
Typical rangeTypical2.4 – 3.9
Possible1 – 6
Worship of MoneyWoM
You?
Average3.5
Typical rangeTypical2.9 – 4.1
Possible1 – 6
Money as StatusMaS
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.3 – 3.2
Possible1 – 6
Avoidance of MoneyAoM
You?
Average3.9
Typical rangeTypical3.2 – 4.7
Possible1 – 6
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test

financial behavior

People comparing conflicting reactions to saving, spending, privacy, or status can use the Klontz Money Attitudes Questionnaire Test to examine which money themes stand out. A money attitudes assessment helps distinguish caution, avoidance, status concerns, and money-focused expectations across the results. This approach suits readers seeking a more specific interpretation of their financial assumptions.

What This Assessment Explores

Items examine beliefs about earning, spending, privacy, status, and money. This money beliefs questionnaire covers trust, morality, and wealth.

Four dimensions follow:

  • Money Vigilance (1-6) measures secrecy, distrust, fear of loss, and caution; Low vigilance (1-2.86), Moderate vigilance (2.87-4.53), High vigilance (4.54-6).
  • Money Worship (1-6) measures belief that money solves problems and possible hoarding; Low (1-2.89), Moderate (2.9-4.6), High (4.61-6).
  • Money as Status (1-6) measures judging people by finances and possible status-driven risk or overspending; Low (1-1.58), Moderate (1.59-3.01), High (3.02-6).
  • Money Avoidance (1-6) measures reluctance to manage money or buy necessities; Low avoidance (1-1.58), Moderate avoidance (1.59-2.85), High avoidance (2.86-6).

Bands show tendency strength, not a diagnosis.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each statement uses six ordered agreement choices, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. A few items use Completely disagree and Completely agree, but the format remains six-point.

Scoring yields four separate results rather than one overall label. However, item weights, reverse-scoring rules, and any total-score formula are not stated in the questionnaire, so they should not be inferred from the displayed ranges.

Conceptually, this online assessment is consistent with the Klontz Money Script Inventory (Klontz et al., 2011). Klontz, Klontz, and Kahler (2008) describe the wider money-script framework. This is not automatically the published inventory or a documented adaptation. Taylor, Klontz, and Britt (2016) reported reliability and convergent validity for the revised KMSI-R; Reiter et al. (2026) later examined it across a diverse sample. Those findings support related published instruments, not automatic validation of this online questionnaire.

Because these money-attitude items use self-report, a money attitude profile can reflect current circumstances, self-awareness, and response style. It has no stated population norms or diagnostic cutoffs, so interpret the profile as endorsed money patterns.

Author: Bradley T. Klontz, Rick Kahler, Ted Klontz
Literature:
  • Klontz, Bradley, Sonya L. Britt, Jennifer Mentzer, and Ted Klontz. (2011). Money Beliefs and Financial Behaviors: Development of the Klontz Money Script Inventory. Journal of Financial Therapy, 2(1), 1-22. 10.4148/jft.v2i1.451
  • Klontz, Brad, Ted Klontz, and Rick Kahler. (2008). Wired for Wealth: Change the Money Mindsets That Keep You Trapped and Unleash Your Wealth Potential. Health Communications, Inc.
  • Taylor, Colby D., Bradley Klontz, and Sonya L. Britt. (2016). Reliability and Convergent Validity of the Klontz Money Script Inventory-Revised (KMSI-R). Journal of Financial Therapy, 6(2), 1-13. 10.4148/1944-9771.1100
  • Reiter, Miranda, Jesse B. Jurgenson, Megan McCoy, Kimberly Watkins, Kenneth White, and Dee Warmath. (2026). Evaluating the Klontz Money Script Inventory-Revised (KMSI-R): Factorial Validity, Internal Consistency, and Measurement Invariance with a Diverse Sample. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 47, 343-355. 10.1007/s10834-025-10055-7

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment