Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine distinctive or complex emotional patterns may use the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test to organize reflection. The emotional creativity questionnaire focuses attention on how unusual, mixed, or difficult-to-name reactions fit a person's wider emotional life, while the result arranges these themes into a profile of tendencies rather than a fixed identity.
What This Assessment Explores
Emotional creativity means generating novel, effective, authentic emotional experiences. Items cover unusual feelings, reflection, expression, and learning from experience. People use this emotional creativity assessment to examine patterns.
It presents three component scales plus one overall score:
- Effectiveness/Authenticity (9-45) shows sincere, skillful expression aligned with core interests: Less aligned/less effective (9-21); Developing authenticity (22-33); Authentic & effective (34-45).
- Novelty (14-70) measures unusual, hard-to-describe feelings: Lower novelty (14-32); Moderate novelty (33-51); Higher novelty (52-70).
- Preparedness (7-35) measures learning from experience and readiness for new emotions: Low readiness (7-16); Moderate readiness (17-25); High readiness (26-35).
- Emotional Creativity (30-150) is the overall score for novel, effective, authentic experiences. Higher overall scores reflect distinctive patterns beyond cultural prototypes; lower scores reflect socially normative responses. Associated benefits include meeting personal and group needs: Lower emotional creativity (30-90); Moderate emotional creativity (91-119); Higher emotional creativity (120-150).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Methodologically, the questionnaire uses 30 self-report statements rated from 1, Disagree, to 5, Agree, with intermediate choices for partial agreement or neutrality. Items sample private experience and outward expression, so respondents should answer from usual patterns rather than one unusually good or difficult event.
Results present four displayed scale scores and bands as descriptive categories. The contribution of individual responses is not stated, so no particular weighting or scoring formula should be inferred. The displayed ranges and bands help interpret the result but do not by themselves establish universal population cutoffs. The questionnaire's standardization status is unspecified.
Conceptually, this questionnaire is consistent with Averill's published Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI), but it is not presented as that original instrument or as a validated adaptation. Later studies by Fuchs, Kumar, and Porter and by Ivcevic, Brackett, and Mayer concern the published ECI rather than this online questionnaire.
This online emotional creativity test remains sensitive to current context, self-awareness, and response style, so its scores describe tendencies rather than diagnose a condition or settle questions about functioning alone.
- Averill, James R. (1999). Individual Differences in Emotional Creativity: Structure and Correlates. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 331-371. 10.1111/1467-6494.00058
- Fuchs, George L., V. K. Kumar, and Jack Porter. (2007). Emotional Creativity, Alexithymia, and Styles of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2-3), 233-245. 10.1080/10400410701397313
- Ivcevic, Zorana, Marc A. Brackett, and John D. Mayer. (2007). Emotional Intelligence and Emotional Creativity. Journal of Personality, 75(2), 199-236. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00437.x
Updated: