Is Family the Top Priority? Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Half of my salary.
- A quarter of my salary.
- I give all my salary, leaving practically nothing for myself.
- Yes, it is a fortress that I cannot find a way out of.
- Yes. No storms are frightening when I am with my family.
- No. But you make every effort to make this statement a reality.
- About a week.
- About a month.
- Two months or more.
Is Family the Top Priority? Test - Description and methodology of the test
For adults weighing household loyalty against autonomy, this questionnaire offers a structured way to examine everyday family decisions. The Is Family the Top Priority? Test is designed for people organizing reflection on household commitments, caregiving, shared decisions, and personal space. This family-priority test can clarify how you approach household commitments and personal boundaries, with a result organized around independence, balance, or placing family first.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines how family ties shape conduct and boundaries. Situations cover food, smoking, money, holidays, home projects, illness, work decisions, and relatives’ difficulties. The result describes the degree to which family is prioritized, while money, time, and shared resources appear as situations used to assess that tendency. It functions as a family values questionnaire for examining care, obligation, sacrifice, and autonomy.
The main themes show what the scenarios ask you to weigh:
- Accommodation shows how readily you adjust routines and habits for relatives’ needs.
- Shared decisions show whether important work, spending, and household choices remain personal or become joint.
- Sacrifice and independence show how you weigh time, money, space, loyalty, and self-direction.
The result is reported as Total Score, 20-60: More independent (20-39), Balanced priority (40-51), and Family-first (52-60). Higher scores indicate greater readiness to place family interests first; lower scores suggest stronger personal independence and more egalitarian family relationships.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each scenario offers three response options representing ways of balancing family loyalty, accommodation, and independence. The family priority questionnaire combines responses into one overall result, so the profile reflects the direction of the respondent’s pattern rather than a separate interpretation for every situation. Choices may express shared decision-making, practical sacrifice, emotional allegiance, or protection of personal space.
The closest conceptual reference is the Familism Scale (Sabogal et al., 1987), which examines family obligation, support, and loyalty. This questionnaire is not that published instrument or a validated adaptation; its scenarios are conceptually consistent with connecting family commitments to everyday choices. The Circumplex Model (Olson, 2000; Olson et al., 1979) adds related family-systems context around cohesion, adaptability, and balance, but those dimensions are not separately scored here.
The displayed score is descriptive and has no cited questionnaire-specific reliability estimates or norms; it is not a standardized norm-based measure. Social desirability, current family conflict, cultural expectations, and limited self-awareness can influence responses. Comparing the result with real-life situations helps distinguish enduring priorities from a temporary circumstance.
- Sabogal, F., Marin, G., Otero-Sabogal, R., Vanoss Marin, B., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn't? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9(4), 397-412. 10.1177/07399863870094003
- Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 144-167. 10.1111/1467-6427.00144
- Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems: I. Cohesion and Adaptability Dimensions, Family Types, and Clinical Applications. Family Process, 18(1), 3-28. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x
Updated: