Self-Assessment of Perseverance Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Self-Assessment of Perseverance Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering a change in their work habits or goal-setting may use the Self-Assessment of Perseverance Test to examine patterns they want to understand more clearly. The resulting perseverance assessment can help frame self-reflection about planning, setbacks, and unfinished tasks, giving the respondent a starting point for deciding which everyday behaviors deserve closer attention.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than measuring achievement itself, the questionnaire examines how a person approaches effort when a task is dull, difficult, interrupted, or temporarily unsuccessful. It supports a perseverance profile for everyday goals, work habits, routines, problem-solving, and disagreement.
The displayed Perseverance Self-Assessment scale ranges from 0-18 and reflects self-rated perseverance and the ability to follow through with tasks. Low (0-6) suggests rapid loss of motivation; Average (7-11) indicates a balanced approach to difficulty; High (12-18) indicates pronounced persistence. The result describes a self-rated tendency, not a fixed character.
The items bring three related dimensions into view:
- Follow-through shows whether you continue boring or repetitive tasks until they are complete.
- Recovery from setbacks shows how readily you try again when an attempt fails or progress slows.
- Sustained resolve shows whether routines, difficult problems, and firmly held aims can maintain your effort.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
In practice, this is a perseverance questionnaire using self-report: each item describes continuing effort, responding to obstacles, maintaining routines, handling challenge, or standing by an intended course of action, and the respondent selects yes or no. The binary format is efficient but compresses nuanced experiences into two choices.
The binary responses are combined into the single displayed score, and the result bands provide broad descriptive levels for that result. The questionnaire presents one combined result rather than separate subscores, so individual answers indicate a general pattern rather than separate verdicts.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Feshchenko's 1999 work and Ilyin's 2009 account of volitional regulation; it is an online self-assessment rather than a standardized reproduction of either source.
Mood, recent success or failure, memory, and the wish to describe oneself favorably can influence yes-or-no answers; recurring behavior across different situations adds useful context to the band.
- Feshchenko, E. K. Age- and Sex-Related Features of Self-Assessment of Volitional Qualities. Candidate of Psychological Sciences dissertation. Saint Petersburg: Herzen Russian State Pedagogical University, 1999, 136 pp.
- Ilyin, E. P. Psychology of Will. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 2009, 368 pp. ISBN 978-5-388-00269-3.
- Kremneva, Alena, Marina Gumerova, Irina Zakharova, Lily Sadykova, Azat Rafikov, and Rustam Malikov. Development of personal qualities of gifted students as the result of the implementation of individual educational routes. SHS Web of Conferences, vol. 97, 01045, 2021. 10.1051/shsconf/20219701045.
Updated: