Personality Boundary Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- Probably yes
- Probably no
- No
- Yes
- Probably yes
- Probably not
- No
- Yes
- Rather yes
- Rather no
- No
Personality Boundary Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People seeking a clearer picture of interpersonal style may find the Personality Boundary Scale Test useful as a structured self-reflection exercise. It organizes responses to ordinary social situations into a profile, helping you notice how boundaries function across contact, emotion, and independence. As a personality boundary assessment, it can clarify patterns that may otherwise be difficult to name.
What This Assessment Explores
Items address saying no, emotion, proximity, help, and needs through this personality boundary scale. They show boundary regulation.
- Total Score (0-144) reflects overall boundary development: Less developed (0-48); Moderately developed (49-96); Well developed (97-144).
- Calm-Neutral (0-10) measures calmness: Low calm-neutral (0-4); Moderate calm-neutral (5-7); High calm-neutral (8-10).
- Restraining (0-10) measures self-regulation: Low restraint (0-3); Moderate restraint (4-7); High restraint (8-10).
- Giving (0-10) measures expression: Reserved expression (0-3); Situational expression (4-7); Open expression (8-10).
- Absorptive (0-10) measures receptivity: Low (0-3); Moderate (4-7); High (8-10).
- Permeable (0-10) measures openness while retaining self: Guarded (0-3); Selective openness (4-7); Open & trusting (8-10).
- Non-Admitting (0-10) measures boundary protection: Low boundary blocking (0-3); Moderate boundary blocking (4-7); High boundary blocking (8-10).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Presented questions use first-person statements about interpersonal contact and emotional expression. In this personality boundary questionnaire, four graded response options usually run from Yes to No; intermediate choices include Probably yes and Probably no. The respondent makes a graded self-report judgment.
Levi's work on psychological boundaries is the closest conceptual reference. It describes a flexible boundary regulating contact between inner experience and the surrounding world. The 2013 qualitative and 2017 bodily-energy approaches address opening, restraint, absorption, and protection from influence. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with this framework and applies these functions to ordinary judgments.
Responses are aggregated into functional indices and an overall result. A balanced, high profile across functions is described as optimal, but no normative data are provided for the total index, making interpretation descriptive rather than population-based. The questionnaire does not disclose how responses are weighted or converted into displayed ranges.
Self-report can shift with mood, relationship context, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose. Scores are most useful beside daily examples.
- Levi, T. S. (2013). A technique for diagnosing psychological boundaries of personality. Voprosy Psikhologii, (1), 131-146.
- Levi, T. S. (2013). Diagnosing the psychological boundary of personality: Qualitative analysis. Voprosy Psikhologii, (5), 93-101.
- Levi, T. S. (2017). The bodily-energy approach to understanding the psychological boundary of a person. Scientific Works of the Moscow University for the Humanities, (2), 10-18. 10.17805/trudy.2017.2.2
Updated: