Existential Search Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Absolutely not
- Mostly no
- Rather no
- Neither yes nor no
- Rather yes
- Mostly yes
- Absolutely yes
- Absolutely no
- Mostly no
- Probably no
- Neither yes nor no
- Probably yes
- Mostly yes
- Absolutely yes
- Strongly disagree
- Mostly disagree
- Rather disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Rather agree
- Mostly agree
- Strongly agree
Existential Search Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People reconsidering their purpose, beliefs, or wider worldview may find the Existential Search Scale Test useful for structured self-reflection. This existential search questionnaire is intended for readers exploring spirituality, values, identity, personal growth, or changes in outlook. It focuses on how someone responds to uncertainty and whether experience can reshape a personal account of meaning.
What This Assessment Explores
The questionnaire examines existential openness rather than a single religious or philosophical conclusion. Its statements address questioning life's meaning, revisiting religious or spiritual beliefs, accepting doubt, recognizing changing opinions, and holding purpose alongside uncertainty. The result describes how actively someone engages with unresolved meaning and how flexible their worldview may be.
These themes shape the profile:
- Questioning meaning shows whether purpose remains open rather than permanently settled.
- Revising beliefs shows whether experience can reshape spiritual or existential convictions.
- Worldview flexibility shows comfort with differing opinions, uncertainty, and future change.
For readers reflecting on values, faith, identity, or development, this existential search assessment can clarify whether openness or stability dominates. Higher search may accompany new meaning and internal development; lower search may coincide with stable or rigid views. Neither direction is automatically better: context determines whether an outlook feels coherent and useful.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses use a seven-point continuum from disagreement through neutrality to agreement. Each answer records a position on a statement, and the questionnaire combines responses into one result. The questionnaire functions as an existential meaning test: its self-report method captures current attitudes, not a permanent worldview.
The Existential Search scale ranges from 9-63: Low search (9-40), Moderate search (41-42), and High search (43-63). This questionnaire's response-to-score conversion is not documented; interpret its displayed bands as reported categories, not clinical cutoffs.
The closest published comparison is the Existential Quest Scale (Van Pachterbeke et al., 2012), which examines openness and change in existential beliefs and worldviews. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but is not presented as an adaptation. Rizzo and colleagues (2019, 2026) studied the Existential Quest Scale’s structure and item functioning. Crumbaugh and Maholick (1964) offer historical context for measuring purpose and existential meaning.
Evidence from the related Existential Quest Scale cannot be transferred to this online version. Scores can reflect current mood, recent experiences, self-awareness, and response style; read the band as a current pattern, not a fixed measure of faith, maturity, or growth.
- Van Pachterbeke, Matthieu, Johannes Keller, and Vassilis Saroglou. (2012). Flexibility in Existential Beliefs and Worldviews: Introducing and Measuring Existential Quest. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(1), 2-16. 10.1027/1614-0001/a000056
- Rizzo, Marco, Silvia Testa, Silvia Gattino, and Anna Miglietta. (2019). Flexibility in Existential Beliefs and Worldview: Testing Measurement Invariance and Factorial Structure of the Existential Quest Scale in an Italian Sample of Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2134. 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02134
- Rizzo, Marco, Giorgia Molinengo, Barbara Loera, Anna Miglietta, and Vassilis Saroglou. (2026). Validating the Existential Quest Scale Using Item Response Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1716603. 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1716603
- Crumbaugh, James C., and Leonard T. Maholick. (1964). An Experimental Study in Existentialism: The Psychometric Approach to Frankl's Concept of Noogenic Neurosis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 200-207. 10.1002/1097-4679(196404)20:2<200::AID-JCLP2270200203>3.0.CO;2-U
Updated: