Parental Mediation of Children's Media Activity Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
Parental Mediation of Children's Media Activity Test - Description and methodology of the test
Parents who want to understand how guidance varies across everyday screen situations can use this questionnaire to reflect on their current approach rather than judge a single incident. The Parental Mediation of Children's Media Activity Test describes how guidance varies across everyday screen situations rather than presenting one overall score. The questionnaire helps clarify a family’s current pattern of parental media guidance and provides a practical starting point for discussion.
What This Assessment Explores
These items cover films, cartoons, YouTube, games, apps, and websites. They ask about advance limits, conversations during or outside use, and joining content chosen by the parent or child. The result describes reported patterns in media guidance for children across shared use, discussion, and advance rules; each dimension receives its own level rather than contributing to a single balance among approaches.
The three displayed scales are:
- Co-Use (0-6) shows shared media use without added discussion: Low co-use 0-2; Moderate co-use 3-5; High co-use 6-6.
- Instructive (0-6) shows discussion that helps a child interpret content and connect it with real-life experience: Low instructive mediation 0-2; Moderate instructive mediation 3-5; High instructive mediation 6-6.
- Restrictive Mediation (0-6) shows advance rules about timing and content: Low restriction 0-2; Moderate restriction 3-5; High restriction 6-6.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses five frequency choices from Never to Always. Items cover video and interactive media such as games, apps, and websites. Responses feed the three dimensions, but conversion from answer choices to result values is not specified; no extra scoring formula should be inferred.
The Parental Mediation Questionnaire (Nimrod et al., 2019) and the 2023 adaptation by Denisenkova, Taruntaev, and Fedorov are conceptual comparators that distinguish active discussion, shared use, and restrictive mediation. Livingstone and Helsper (2008) provide a broader framework for parental regulation and online engagement. This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with their dimensions but is a separate form; published validation does not automatically transfer to it.
Interpret the profile as a snapshot of reported practices in the situations covered, not a fixed parenting style. A child’s age, content, household routines, and current concerns can shift responses; memory may omit situations, and candour may affect reporting. Read the separate levels as prompts for reflection and family discussion about approaches that fit particular screen situations.
- Denisenkova, N. S., Taruntaev, P. I., & Fedorov, V. V. (2023). Adaptation of the Questionnaire Parental Mediation Of Children's Media Activity by G. Nimrod, D. Lemish, N. Elias on a Russian Sample of Parents of Older Preschoolers. Psychological-Educational Studies, 15(3), 96-114. 10.17759/psyedu.2023150307
- Nimrod, G., Elias, N., & Lemish, D. (2019). Measuring Mediation of Children’s Media Use. International Journal of Communication, 13, 342-358.
- Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2008). Parental Mediation of Children’s Internet Use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(4), 581-599. 10.1080/08838150802437396
Updated: