Attitudes Toward Death Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly disagree
- Completely agree
- Partly agree
- Completely disagree
- Strongly agree
- Partly agree
- Strongly disagree
Attitudes Toward Death Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine their personal relationship with death can use the Attitudes Toward Death Scale Test as a structured starting point. It can help someone decide which aspect of their attitudes toward death deserves closer reflection. The single overall score reflects how developed and accepting the attitude appears, helping the reader choose what to explore next.
What This Assessment Explores
It examines reactions to dying and funerals, alongside beliefs about suffering, extending life, or overcoming death. It also considers preferences about receiving information, advance planning, and organ donation, linking feelings with conduct.
Together, these themes show how acceptance of death may appear in feelings, beliefs, and conduct. The questions cover these themes, which the result summarizes as follows:
- Emotional unease shows how death-related situations affect comfort and avoidance.
- Beliefs about suffering and extending life show views about pain, mortality, and overcoming death.
- End-of-life choices show preferences about information, planning, and organ donation.
- Total Score: 0-26 describes how developed and accepting the attitude appears: Low acceptance 0-16, Moderate acceptance 17-21, and High acceptance 22-26. Lower results may indicate unresolved fears or anxiety that may affect daily functioning, while higher results reflect conscious acceptance.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The items are self-report statements answered on a three-point agreement format. Wording shifts between strong, partial, and complete agreement or disagreement, while each response locates a personal reaction rather than a factual answer. Responses are combined into one overall result, emphasizing a general attitude pattern instead of separate subscale profiles.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Feifel (1959) death-attitude study, but it is not presented as a direct adaptation of that publication. Feifel’s 1955 research, the later Feifel and Branscomb (1973) work, and Neimeyer, Moser, and Wittkowski (2003) provide the relevant evidence base for death attitudes and attitudes toward dying. They support the construct without establishing that this online form has identical samples, administration, or validation procedures.
The questionnaire provides the displayed bands for that score; these labels are distinct from population norms and clinical cutoffs. Current grief, illness, culture, personal experience, and the wish to appear composed can influence answers. Self-report also depends on self-awareness and honest disclosure, so interpret the result as a reflective indicator, not a diagnosis.
- Feifel, H. (1959). Attitudes toward death in some normal and mentally ill populations. In H. Feifel (Ed.), The Meaning of Death (pp. 114-130). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Feifel, H. (1955). Attitudes of mentally ill patients toward death. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 122(4), 375-380. 10.1097/00005053-195510000-00009
- Feifel, H., & Branscomb, A. B. (1973). Who's afraid of death? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 81(3), 282-288. 10.1037/h0034519
- Neimeyer, R. A., Moser, R. P., & Wittkowski, J. (2003). Assessing attitudes toward dying and death: Psychometric considerations. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, 47(1), 45-76. 10.2190/EP4R-TULM-W52G-L3EX
Updated: