Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
attitude towards illness

Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test

Take the online Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for people supporting a seriously ill loved one, the Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test contains 25 questions and takes about 5 minutes. Your result highlights patterns of emotional response, detachment, harmony, and overprotectiveness, offering a clear starting point for self-reflection and understanding your support pattern.
Questions: 255 minutes
Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
32,993 views
3,662 completions
3,068 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
3,068 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

DetachmentD
Measures the degree to which a relative responds to a loved one’s illness with emotional distance and largely formal, low-involvement support.
example score54/100
54/100Somewhat detachedexample score
0 – 43Engaged
44 – 63Somewhat detached
64 – 100Strongly detached
A score of 54 falls in the “Somewhat detached” range, suggesting intermittent emotional distancing and a tendency toward more formal or limited involvement in support.
Harmonious ReactionHR
Measures the degree to which a relative maintains a balanced, realistic, and constructive response to a loved one’s illness while combining care with self-care.
example score51/100
51/100Moderate harmonyexample score
0 – 43Low harmony
44 – 63Moderate harmony
64 – 100High harmony
A score of 51 indicates a moderately harmonious reaction, suggesting generally balanced support and realistic appraisal with occasional strain or inconsistency under stress.
Emotional ReactionER
Measures the intensity of anxiety, worry, uncertainty, guilt, and related emotional strain in response to a loved one’s illness.
example score80/100
80/100Highexample score
0 – 43Low
44 – 73Moderate
74 – 100High
A score of 80 falls in the High range, indicating pronounced emotional tension with elevated worry and guilt that may be accompanied by irritability or fatigue.
OverprotectivenessO
Measures the degree of excessive caregiving and self-sacrificing efforts to shield an ill loved one from difficulties, potentially limiting their independence.
example score34/100
34/100Moderateexample score
0 – 33Low
34 – 63Moderate
64 – 100High
A score of 34 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward increased protection and taking on extra responsibility, while not being consistently overinvolved.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Worried family caregivers
41%OF USERS
Relatives who are actively helping with treatment and daily care take it to understand their stress reactions and communicate better with the patient.
Anxious close relatives
34%OF USERS
Family members overwhelmed by fear, guilt, or uncertainty use it to name what they’re feeling and find a steadier way to support their loved one.
Counselors and psychologists
25%OF USERS
Professionals working with families in health crises use it to quickly map typical reaction styles and plan more effective guidance.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
DetachmentD
You?
Average45.9
Typical rangeTypical33 – 58.8
Possible0 – 100
Harmonic ReactionHR
You?
Average66.6
Typical rangeTypical52.9 – 80.2
Possible0 – 100
Emotional ReactionER
You?
Average48.1
Typical rangeTypical35.8 – 60.4
Possible0 – 100
OverprotectionO
You?
Average68.4
Typical rangeTypical53.2 – 83.7
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Select one response option for each statement. Please note that there are no “right” or “wrong” answers, as each response is valid in relation to the respondent’s own views. Please answer as honestly and accurately as possible.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Partly disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Partly disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Completely disagree
    • Partly disagree
    • Partly agree
    • Completely agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test - Description and methodology of the test

attitude towards illness

Understanding how illness has changed support, closeness, or family roles can clarify day-to-day caregiving for relatives and other close supporters. The Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness Test gives a structured way to reflect on those changes without treating one response as a fixed identity. Its result helps a respondent consider their family caregiving response, current emotional strain, involvement, and patterns of support within the relationship.

What This Assessment Explores

The questions examine involvement, boundaries, family cooperation, and balance between the patient's needs and the caregiver's life. Reactions to a loved one's illness may include balanced judgment, distress, withdrawal, or excessive involvement. Results reflect current caregiving situation, emotional state, and relationship patterns, including changes in closeness, roles, and support.

These scales describe the dimensions:

  • Detachment (0-100) shows indifferent, formal assistance with reduced closeness; Engaged 0-43, Somewhat detached 44-63, Strongly detached 64-100.
  • Harmonious Reaction (0-100) reflects realistic appraisal, balanced caregiving and personal needs, constructive relationships, and effective support; Low harmony 0-43, Moderate harmony 44-63, High harmony 64-100.
  • Emotional Reaction (0-100) captures distress, anxiety, worry, guilt, fatigue, irritability, possible aggression, and internal strain; Low 0-43, Moderate 44-73, High 74-100.
  • Overprotectiveness (0-100) indicates excessive caregiving that may neglect the caregiver's needs or hinder the patient's independence; Low 0-33, Moderate 34-63, High 64-100.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item is a self-report statement with four graded choices. Most ask about agreement; others ask frequency, using options such as Rarely, Sometimes, Often, and Always. Themes include protection, despair, sleep, family discussion, shared responsibilities, treatment decisions, and preserving ordinary activities.

The four displayed scores describe a caregiver's emotional response across separate tendencies. Higher values indicate more of the tendency named by each scale, while the displayed bands summarize intensity. This version does not state the points assigned to individual answers, so the ranges do not justify inferring an undisclosed scoring formula.

The closest conceptual source is Relatives' Illness Reaction Types by Bespanskaya-Pavlenko and Fursa (2014). This online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but it is not presented as an adaptation of the published instrument.

No normative sample, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs are stated. Scores may shift with stress, family circumstances, self-awareness, and pressure to appear capable or caring, so interpret the pattern alongside the context.

Author: Charles S. Carver, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross
Literature:
  • Bespanskaya-Pavlenko, E. D., & Fursa, K. A. (2014). Psychological Types of Relatives' Reactions to a Loved One's Illness. Psychological Journal (Minsk), no. 1-2.
  • Rolland, J. S. (1987). Chronic Illness and the Life Cycle: A Conceptual Framework. Family Process, 26(2), 203-221. 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00203.x
  • Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On Death and Dying. New York: Macmillan.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment