Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cbt

Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test

Take the online Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for parents, the Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test uses 23 questions and takes about 5 minutes. It explores how you respond to difficult feelings around your child, including rethinking situations, hiding emotions, giving in, or stepping away. Your profile can support practical self-reflection about everyday parenting responses.
Questions: 235 minutes
Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2): agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
32,923 views
3,176 completions
2,784 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,784 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

SuppressionS
Measures the extent to which a parent tends to hold back or conceal emotions during interactions with their child.
example score4/7
4/7Moderate suppressionexample score
1 – 2Low suppression
3 – 5Moderate suppression
6 – 7High suppression
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to suppress emotions, suggesting the parent sometimes restrains emotional expression, especially in challenging moments.
Cognitive ReappraisalCR
Measures how effectively a parent reframes challenging child-related situations to reduce negative emotional impact and support constructive responding.
example score6/7
6/7High reappraisalexample score
1 – 3Low reappraisal
4 – 5Moderate reappraisal
6 – 7High reappraisal
A score of 6 falls in the High reappraisal range, suggesting the parent typically uses positive reinterpretation effectively when interactions become stressful.
CapitulationC
Capitulation measures a parent's tendency to give in to difficult emotions rather than actively trying to regulate them during challenging interactions with a child.
example score2/7
2/7Low capitulationexample score
1 – 2Low capitulation
3 – 5Moderate capitulation
6 – 7High capitulation
A score of 2 indicates low capitulation, suggesting the parent is generally less likely to surrender to difficult emotions without attempting to manage them.
AvoidanceA
Measures the tendency to withdraw from emotionally challenging parenting situations or avoid discussing difficult emotions.
example score4/7
4/7Moderate avoidanceexample score
1 – 2Low avoidance
3 – 5Moderate avoidance
6 – 7High avoidance
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to step back from emotionally difficult moments, with some willingness to engage when needed.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Stressed parents of young kids
41%OF USERS
They want to see how they handle strong emotions during tantrums, defiance, and daily conflicts, and what strategies they rely on most.
Parents in counseling or therapy
34%OF USERS
They take it to clarify current coping habits and set practical goals for improving emotional balance in interactions with their child.
Parent educators and researchers
25%OF USERS
They use it to quickly assess emotion-regulation strategies in groups and track changes after trainings or interventions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
SuppressionS
You?
Average3.5
Typical rangeTypical2.7 – 4.4
Possible1 – 7
Cognitive ReappraisalCR
You?
Average5.5
Typical rangeTypical4.5 – 6.4
Possible1 – 7
CapitulationC
You?
Average5.3
Typical rangeTypical4.2 – 6.4
Possible1 – 7
AvoidanceA
You?
Average2.7
Typical rangeTypical1.9 – 3.4
Possible1 – 7
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You will be presented with a series of statements about ways of regulating one’s emotional state in challenging (difficult, stressful) situations when interacting with a child (children). Please indicate the extent to which you agree that the statements describe your typical behavior.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test - Description and methodology of the test

cbt
emotion regulation
parental stress

Parents who want to understand their reactions when a child’s behavior becomes difficult can use this questionnaire to examine how emotions are managed. The Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test focuses on changing interpretations, concealing feelings, yielding, and creating distance. As a parenting self-reflection test, it can support reflection on possible effects on communication, boundaries, and family life rather than measure those outcomes.

What This Assessment Explores

Tense parent-child moments involve upset, concealment, yielding, or stepping away. Viewed as emotion regulation strategies for parents, the questionnaire shows routes to relief without judging responses.

Its four displayed dimensions are:

  • Suppression (1-7) reflects concealed emotion; Low suppression (1-2), Moderate suppression (3-5), and High suppression (6-7) show increasing levels at higher bands, possibly indicating difficulty with emotional openness.
  • Cognitive Reappraisal (1-7) reflects reframing difficult situations; Low reappraisal (1-3), Moderate reappraisal (4-5), and High reappraisal (6-7) mark more developed reappraisal skills at higher bands.
  • Capitulation (1-7) reflects giving in to difficult emotions; Low capitulation (1-2), Moderate capitulation (3-5), and High capitulation (6-7) may indicate reduced coping strategies at higher bands.
  • Avoidance (1-7) reflects withdrawing or avoiding discussion; Low avoidance (1-2), Moderate avoidance (3-5), and High avoidance (6-7) may indicate greater emotional distance from emotional problems at higher bands.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Responses use a seven-point agreement format, from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with recognizable parenting situations. Answers are grouped into four dimensions rather than one undifferentiated emotional-control score. The questionnaire provides four descriptive result bands, but it does not specify how individual responses become scale scores or establish that published PERI-2 psychometric findings apply to this online version.

Its closest evidence base is the 2017 revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory, or PERI-2, associated with Lorber and colleagues. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not automatically identical to its published items, validation sample, or scoring procedure. Lorber’s 2012 study connects maternal emotion regulation with overreactive and lax discipline, while Gross and John’s 2003 work distinguishes reappraisal from suppression. In this parent emotion regulation assessment, those ideas organize self-observation rather than establish clinical status.

Across the items, parents consider changing interpretations of a child’s behavior, hiding upset, giving in, and stepping away. Because this is self-report, current stress, memory, self-awareness, or the wish to appear favorable can affect the profile. Interpret it alongside real-life observations and family context.

Author: James J. Gross, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Literature:
  • Michael F. Lorber, Tamara Del Vecchio, Michael A. Feder, and Amy M. Smith Slep (2017). A Psychometric Evaluation of the Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(2), 452-463. 10.1007/s10826-016-0578-3
  • Michael F. Lorber (2012). The Role of Maternal Emotion Regulation in Overreactive and Lax Discipline. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(4), 642-647. 10.1037/a0029109
  • James J. Gross and Oliver P. John (2003). Individual Differences in Two Emotion Regulation Processes: Implications for Affect, Relationships, and Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348-362. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment