Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cbt

Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test

Take the online Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how a parent regulates emotions during tough moments with a child in about 5 minutes. Pinpoint key coping strategies to guide targeted support, coaching, and skill-building.
Start Online Test
Questions: 235 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
28,281 view
2,770 completions
2,443 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
4/7
Suppression (S)
Measures the extent to which a parent tends to hold back or conceal emotions during interactions with their child.
Low suppression
Moderate suppression
High suppression
12: Low suppression | 35: Moderate suppression | 67: High suppression
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to suppress emotions, suggesting the parent sometimes restrains emotional expression, especially in challenging moments.
example score
6/7
Cognitive Reappraisal (CR)
Measures how effectively a parent reframes challenging child-related situations to reduce negative emotional impact and support constructive responding.
Low reappraisal
Moderate reappraisal
High reappraisal
13: Low reappraisal | 45: Moderate reappraisal | 67: High reappraisal
A score of 6 falls in the High reappraisal range, suggesting the parent typically uses positive reinterpretation effectively when interactions become stressful.
example score
2/7
Capitulation (C)
Capitulation measures a parent's tendency to give in to difficult emotions rather than actively trying to regulate them during challenging interactions with a child.
Low capitulation
Moderate capitulation
High capitulation
12: Low capitulation | 35: Moderate capitulation | 67: High capitulation
A score of 2 indicates low capitulation, suggesting the parent is generally less likely to surrender to difficult emotions without attempting to manage them.
example score
4/7
Avoidance (A)
Measures the tendency to withdraw from emotionally challenging parenting situations or avoid discussing difficult emotions.
Low avoidance
Moderate avoidance
High avoidance
12: Low avoidance | 35: Moderate avoidance | 67: High avoidance
A score of 4 indicates a moderate tendency to step back from emotionally difficult moments, with some willingness to engage when needed.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Stressed parents of young kids
41%OF USERS
They want to see how they handle strong emotions during tantrums, defiance, and daily conflicts, and what strategies they rely on most.
Parents in counseling or therapy
34%OF USERS
They take it to clarify current coping habits and set practical goals for improving emotional balance in interactions with their child.
Parent educators and researchers
25%OF USERS
They use it to quickly assess emotion-regulation strategies in groups and track changes after trainings or interventions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Suppression (S)
Suppression (S)
Average
3.5
Normal range
2.74.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Cognitive Reappraisal (CR)
Cognitive Reappraisal (CR)
Average
5.5
Normal range
4.56.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Capitulation (C)
Capitulation (C)
Average
5.3
Normal range
4.26.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Avoidance (A)
Avoidance (A)
Average
2.7
Normal range
1.93.4
min.
1
max.
7
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You will be presented with a series of statements about ways of regulating one’s emotional state in challenging (difficult, stressful) situations when interacting with a child (children). Please indicate the extent to which you agree that the statements describe your typical behavior.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neutral
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Emotion Regulation in Parents, PERI2 Test

Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) Test - Symptoms and Signs

cbt
emotion regulation
parental stress

This measure is designed to assess how parents regulate their emotions in challenging interactions with their child. The Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) is a brief self-report questionnaire focused on commonly used emotion-regulation strategies in parenting contexts.

It consists of 23 items and typically takes about 5 minutes to complete. Items ask respondents to rate the extent to which they use specific approaches, such as cognitive reappraisal and suppression of unwanted thoughts, when managing negative affect related to parenting stress.

The Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory (PERI-2) may be used in clinical or research settings to characterize parents’ emotion-regulation patterns, support case formulation, and inform targets for intervention; it is not, by itself, a diagnostic instrument. It is attributed to Susan Nolen-Hoeksema.

Author: James J. Gross, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Literature: Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment