Self-Rated Perseverance Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Self-Rated Perseverance Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand why they persist, pause, or abandon a goal may find the Self-Rated Perseverance Scale Test useful for examining their usual responses to effort and difficulty. It suits self-reflection about goal persistence, follow-through, motivation, and flexibility when progress is slow. This assessment offers a concise profile of goal-directed habits rather than a fixed verdict on character.
What This Assessment Explores
Items examine how people maintain goals through patience, effort, and setbacks. They cover planning, delayed reward, confidence after failure, finishing tasks, and changing direction when obstacles or boredom appear. Persistence is considered alongside flexibility.
These themes support reflection on long-term aims. The catalogue reports one scale, Self-Rated Perseverance (0-18), which measures self-perceived, goal-directed persistence despite difficulties: Low persistence (0-6), Balanced persistence (7-11), and High persistence (12-18). Lower scores suggest compliance or rapid goal shifting; average scores suggest a balance of persistence and flexibility, while higher scores indicate greater perseverance. The questions address three themes in this perseverance questionnaire:
- Goal commitment shows how firmly a person holds a direction.
- Setback response shows whether difficulty weakens resolve or renews effort.
- Follow-through and flexibility describe persistence alongside organization and sensible adjustment.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses a Yes-or-No response. The items sample goal setting, persistence over time, reactions to obstacles, self-organization, and loss of interest. Answers are combined into the displayed result, but the scoring display does not state points assigned to each response. Interpretation should stay with the shown category rather than assume an unlisted rule.
The conceptual comparison is Feshchenko’s 1999 dissertation research on perseverance and volitional self-regulation. Ilyin’s 2009 work on the psychology of will adds context about effort, delay, and regulation. The questionnaire addresses similar ideas without claiming to reproduce that dissertation instrument. Its themes overlap with the long-term goal persistence examined by Duckworth and colleagues in 2007; it is not the Grit Scale or a direct adaptation.
Perseverance assessment results are a snapshot of self-perception. Stress, confidence, organization, and meanings assigned to success or failure can influence answers. The displayed bands are catalogue categories, and the answer-to-point mapping is not specified; the profile cannot by itself determine a diagnosis or fixed ability level.
- Feshchenko, E. K. (1999). Age- and Sex-Related Features of Self-Assessment of Volitional Qualities [Candidate of Psychological Sciences dissertation]. St Petersburg.
- Ilyin, E. P. (2009). Psychology of Will (2nd ed., revised and expanded). St Petersburg: Piter. ISBN 978-5-388-00269-3.
- Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087-1101. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
Updated: