Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
emotionality

Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test

Take the online Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 30 questions completed in about 6 minutes, the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test explores how you understand, experience, and express emotions. Your result highlights patterns in emotional originality, preparedness, authenticity, and effectiveness, offering a focused starting point for self-reflection and a clearer view of your emotional profile.
Questions: 306 minutes
Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
20,486 views
1,329 completions
1,113 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,113 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Effectiveness/AuthenticityE
Measures how sincerely and skillfully you express emotions in ways that align with your values and support well-being.
example score22/45
22/45Moderately authentic/effectiveexample score
9 – 20Less authentic/less effective
21 – 33Moderately authentic/effective
34 – 45Highly authentic/effective
A score of 22 indicates a moderately authentic and effective emotional expression style, suggesting you can express feelings sincerely at times but may be inconsistent across situations.
NoveltyN
Novelty measures how readily you experience unconventional, hard-to-name emotions rather than familiar, everyday feeling states.
example score44/70
44/70Moderate noveltyexample score
14 – 32Lower novelty
33 – 51Moderate novelty
52 – 70Higher novelty
A score of 44 falls in the Moderate novelty range, suggesting you sometimes notice and explore unusual emotional nuances while still often relying on familiar emotion patterns.
PreparednessP
Readiness measures how well you recognize and make sense of current emotions by drawing on prior emotional experiences.
example score19/35
19/35Typicalexample score
7 – 16Developing
17 – 25Typical
26 – 35Well-developed
A score of 19 falls in the Typical range, suggesting a generally adequate ability to interpret present emotions using past emotional learning.
Emotional CreativityEC
Measures how readily a person can form novel, effective, and authentic emotional experiences beyond standard cultural patterns.
example score129/150
129/150High creativityexample score
30 – 90Typical range
91 – 120Elevated creativity
121 – 150High creativity
A score of 129 falls in the High creativity range, suggesting a strong tendency to generate flexible and distinctive emotional responses rather than relying on conventional ones.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Self-explorers and journalers
41%OF USERS
People who like reflecting on their inner life take it to understand how uniquely they experience, combine, and reshape emotions.
Creatives and performers
34%OF USERS
Artists, writers, actors, and musicians use it to see how inventive their emotional palette is for expression and storytelling.
Therapy and coaching clients
25%OF USERS
People working on emotional growth take it to spot new ways of feeling and responding beyond familiar patterns.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Effectiveness/authenticityE
You?
Average31.8
Typical rangeTypical26.4 – 37.2
Possible9 – 45
NoveltyN
You?
Average53
Typical rangeTypical46 – 60
Possible14 – 70
ReadinessR
You?
Average21.6
Typical rangeTypical18.1 – 25.1
Possible7 – 35
Emotional Creativity ScaleECS
You?
Average76.1
Typical rangeTypical55.4 – 96.9
Possible30 – 150
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Rather disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Rather agree
    • Agree
    • Disagree
    • Somewhat disagree
    • Neither agree nor disagree
    • Somewhat agree
    • Agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test - Description and methodology of the test

emotionality

Readers wondering whether unusual or complex feelings can become authentic, effective, and adaptable responses may find the Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI) Test a useful way to explore that question. This emotional creativity assessment asks whether emotional originality, learning from experience, and flexible expression shape the way a person responds. It is suited to self-reflection when familiar labels do not fully capture emotional life.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire looks beyond emotional intensity. Items ask about understanding strong feelings, learning from past experiences, unusual or simultaneous emotions, flexible responses, and outward expression that matches inner states. This emotional creativity questionnaire suits readers seeking a structured self-reflection tool for their emotional style. Its displayed result contains four related dimensions:

  • Effectiveness/Authenticity (9-45) shows sincere, skillful expression: Less authentic/less effective (9-20), Moderately authentic/effective (21-33), Highly authentic/effective (34-45).
  • Novelty (14-70) shows unusual, hard-to-describe emotional experiences: Lower novelty (14-32), Moderate novelty (33-51), Higher novelty (52-70).
  • Preparedness (7-35) shows use of past emotional learning: Developing (7-16), Typical (17-25), Well-developed (26-35).
  • Emotional Creativity (30-150) shows novel, effective, authentic emotional patterns: Typical range (30-90), Elevated creativity (91-120), High creativity (121-150).

Taken together, higher totals indicate more of the quality named by each scale.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses a five-point agreement response, moving from disagreement to agreement, with a middle option where appropriate. The assessment aggregates those responses into displayed dimension totals. The possible ranges show the span of each total, but a range alone cannot reconstruct individual scoring or reveal whether any statement is reverse-keyed.

The assessment is conceptually consistent with Averill's 1999 Emotional Creativity Inventory, which treats emotional creativity as novelty, effectiveness, authenticity, and preparedness. This online questionnaire should not be assumed to directly adapt every published version. The factor study by Ghadiri Nezhdyan and Abdi and work by Soroa and colleagues concern original or shortened Spanish versions; they cannot establish validity or norms for this online scoring format.

For this emotional creativity test, result bands are interpretive categories describing displayed score levels, not clinical thresholds or evidence of standing in a defined population. Honest responses remain important because current mood, memory, self-awareness, and impression management can influence self-report results. Use the profile to identify patterns worth examining rather than treating a score as a fixed identity or diagnosis.

Author: J. R. Averill
Literature:
  • Averill, James R. (1999). Individual Differences in Emotional Creativity: Structure and Correlates. Journal of Personality, 67(2), 331-371. 10.1111/1467-6494.00058
  • Ghadiri Nezhdyan, Fatemeh, and Beheshteh Abdi (2010). Factor Structure of Emotional Creativity Inventory (ECI-Averill, 1999) Among Iranian Undergraduate Students in Tehran Universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1836-1840. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.374
  • Soroa, Goretti, Arantxa Gorostiaga, Aitor Aritzeta, and Nekane Balluerka (2015). A Shortened Spanish Version of the Emotional Creativity Inventory (the ECI-S). Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 232-239. 10.1080/10400419.2015.1030313

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment