Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
emotional state

Mood Assessment Test

Take the online Mood Assessment Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Mood Assessment Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Designed for a quick look at current emotional tone, the Mood Assessment Test contains 21 questions and takes about 4 minutes. Its result indicates whether elevated, low-energy, or neutral feelings are more prominent, helping you reflect on your present state and notice patterns worth exploring.
Questions: 214 minutes
Mood Assessment Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
37,073 views
4,579 completions
3,818 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
3,818 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Euphoric MoodEM
Measures the intensity of elevated, joyful mood at the time of assessment.
example score2/9
2/9Lowexample score
0 – 3Low
4 – 6Moderate
7 – 9High
A score of 2 falls in the Low range, suggesting little to no pronounced mood elevation right now.
Asthenic MoodAM
Measures the current intensity of asthenic mood states such as fatigue, low energy, and reduced emotional tone.
example score4/9
4/9Moderateexample score
0 – 3Low
4 – 6Moderate
7 – 9High
A score of 4 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pronounced presence of low-energy or fatigued mood at the moment.
NeutralN
Measures how strongly a typical, neutral mood is currently predominant without pronounced emotional fluctuations.
example score6/9
6/9Moderately usualexample score
0 – 3Reduced usual mood
4 – 6Moderately usual
7 – 9Strongly usual
A score of 6 suggests your mood is largely typical and neutral overall, though it may still be somewhat influenced by other states.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Therapy and psychiatry clients
41%OF USERS
People in psychotherapy or psychiatric care use it to quickly track whether their current mood is normal, overly elevated, or negatively toned between sessions.
Stressed professionals and students
34%OF USERS
Busy people take it when they feel emotionally off and want a fast snapshot of what mood is dominating right now.
Coaches and training groups
25%OF USERS
Participants in personal development or skills training use it to check their emotional state before or after intensive exercises and discussions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
EuphoricE
You?
Average5
Typical rangeTypical3.4 – 6.6
Possible0 – 9
AsthenicA
You?
Average2.5
Typical rangeTypical1.2 – 3.7
Possible0 – 9
OrdinaryO
You?
Average3.9
Typical rangeTypical2.8 – 5
Possible0 – 9
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Yes
    • No
    • On the contrary
    • Yes
    • No
    • On the contrary
    • Yes
    • No
    • On the contrary
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Mood Assessment Test - Description and methodology of the test

emotional state

People who want to understand a recent shift in energy, pleasure, irritability, or emotional flatness can use the Mood Assessment Test as a structured self-check. The questionnaire organizes present experiences as a mood self-assessment, helping the respondent compare the relative prominence of its three scores and identify what has changed recently. The result gives a compact way to connect that pattern with recent circumstances and feelings.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines recent emotional tone through energy, pleasure, tension, irritability, social openness, trust, and outlook. It suits readers seeking a structured mood profile of current feelings, rather than a single positive-or-negative label.

The result contains three dimensions:

  • Euphoric Mood (0-9) reflects elevated, joyful feelings; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-6, and High 7-9 show increasing prominence.
  • Asthenic Mood (0-9) reflects fatigue and reduced energy; Low 0-3, Moderate 4-6, and High 7-9 show increasing severity.
  • Neutral (0-9) reflects a stable, even state; Reduced usual mood 0-3, Moderately usual 4-6, and Strongly usual 7-9 show its predominance.

Together, the profile indicates which emotional direction is most noticeable now. A lower score on one dimension does not by itself show that its opposite is severe; another mood may simply be more prominent.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement describes an emotional reaction, social perception, energy level, or expectation about the future. The respondent selects Yes, No, or On the contrary, indicating agreement, disagreement, or the opposite condition. The questionnaire reports separate scores for its three dimensions but does not specify how each response is converted into points.

The structure is conceptually consistent with the Mood Assessment Questionnaire (Marishchuk et al., 1984). It also relates to emotional-sphere methods discussed by Barkanova (2009) and differential self-assessment work by Doskin et al. (1973). This online version is not a documented adaptation of those publications, so they do not establish norms for it.

Interpret this mood assessment questionnaire by reading the pattern across dimensions alongside the situations that may have shaped it. Elevated energy, distrust, irritability, withdrawal, fatigue, optimism, or bleak expectations can reflect temporary context as well as a broader tendency. The displayed bands are the result labels used by this questionnaire. Because self-report depends on honesty, self-awareness, and current circumstances, the profile is a time-specific snapshot rather than a diagnosis.

Author: Author not specified
Literature:
  • Marishchuk, Vladimir Lavrentyevich, Yuri Matveyevich Bludov, Viktor Aleksandrovich Plakhtienko, and Lidiya Konstantinovna Serova. Methods of Psychodiagnostics in Sport: Study Guide for Special Courses at Pedagogical Institutes. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1984. 191 pp.
  • Barkanova, Olga Vladimirovna. Methods for Diagnosing the Emotional Sphere: A Psychological Workshop. Krasnoyarsk: Litera-Print, 2009. 237 pp.
  • Doskin, Vladimir Alekseevich, Natalia Alekseevna Lavrentieva, Mikhail Petrovich Miroshnikov, and Vladimir Borisovich Sharai. Test of Differential Self-Assessment of Functional State. Questions of Psychology, no. 6, 1973, pp. 141-145.

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment