Adolescent Responsibility Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Partly agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Partly agree
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Completely disagree
- Disagree
- Partly agree
- Mostly agree
- Completely agree
Adolescent Responsibility Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how responsibility appears in an adolescent’s daily choices can use the Adolescent Responsibility Scale Test as a structured self-reflection tool. Adolescents answer the questionnaire, while parents, educators, and practitioners may use the profile to discuss reliability, accountability, cooperation, and self-regulation. An adolescent responsibility assessment presents a profile of tendencies across personal, social, moral, and environmental situations, rather than a single judgment about character.
What This Assessment Explores
The statements address duties, honesty, harm, helping, nature, and accountability. As a teen responsibility questionnaire, the result groups them into these dimensions:
- Lie Scale (3-15) flags distortion: Low distortion (3-6), Moderate distortion (7-11), High distortion (12-15).
- Responsibility Avoidance (4-20) measures duty evasion: Low avoidance (4-7), High avoidance (8-20).
- Environmental Stewardship (4-20) measures ecological responsibility: Low (4-12), Moderate (13-15), High (16-20).
- Social Responsibility (3-15) measures norms and accountability: Low (3-6), Moderate (7-7), High (8-15).
- Conscience (3-15) measures duty and moral reflection: Less developed (3-7), Developing (8-10), Well developed (11-15).
- Self-Control (4-20) measures behavioral and emotional regulation: Lower self-control (4-12), Moderate self-control (13-14), Higher self-control (15-20).
- Support (6-30) measures helping and cooperation: Low support (6-22), High support (23-30).
- Responsibility (20-100) measures integrated accountability: Low (20-60), Moderate (61-68), High (69-100).
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses five agreement choices, although anchor wording varies slightly. The items ask about school duties, punctuality, promises, honesty, helping relatives, shared spaces, volunteering, blame, concern for others, environmental care, and contribution to group life. The questionnaire reports dimension scores and displayed bands; its item weighting, reversal rules, and full scoring procedure are not specified.
The 27-item online questionnaire is an English adaptation of the responsibility instrument reported by Danilova et al. (2024), retaining its scale structure. The study’s standardization and psychometric findings apply to the published version, not this online translation.
Read as a responsibility test for adolescents, the result is a profile of tendencies rather than a norm-based character judgment. Muzdybaev’s framework treats responsibility as connected with self-regulation, social obligations, consequences, and relationships. Self-report scores can shift with candor, circumstances, and self-awareness; a high distortion result may indicate socially desirable responding without proving dishonesty. The displayed bands are result categories, not population norms or clinical cutoffs, and published standardization of the source instrument does not establish norms for this online version.
- Danilova E.E., Begunova L.A., Lisichkina A.G., Andreeva D.A. The Methodology of "Responsibility in Adolescents": Development and Description. Psychological-Educational Studies, 2024, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 69-84. 10.17759/psyedu.2024160305
- Muzdybaev K. Psychology of Responsibility. Edited by V.E. Semenov. 2nd ed. Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2010. 248 p.
Updated: