Home Attachment Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Not sure
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Hard to say
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Hard to say
- Somewhat agree
- Strongly agree
Home Attachment Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers considering what their living environment means in daily life, the Home Attachment Scale Test offers a focused way to reflect on personal routines and expectations. Its result can help you consider your emotional attachment to home and whether your current home feels fitting. It suits self-reflection when you want a clearer picture of your bond with where you live.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions in this home attachment questionnaire focus on the relationship with home, not housing quality. They ask whether home feels part of the self, a setting for enjoyable activities, and a source of satisfaction and safety. Other items consider co-residents, personal meaning, and willingness to invest effort at home.
The item themes help explain what contributes to the single result:
- Emotional bond describes home’s personal significance, importance, and sense of safety.
- Comfort and enjoyment indicate whether home supports satisfaction and valued activities.
- Identity and commitment show how home reflects lifestyle and willingness to invest effort.
The catalogue reports one Home Attachment scale, scored 1-5. Results appear as Low attachment (1-3), Moderate attachment (3.1-4.4), or High attachment (4.5-5). A higher score shows stronger attachment; lower ones may reflect a weaker bond or dissatisfaction, while middle results suggest a neutral connection.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses use five ordered choices from strong disagreement to strong agreement, with a middle option such as Not sure or Hard to say. This format captures direction and intensity while allowing uncertainty.
By assessing attachment to home, the questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the instrument described by Reznichenko et al. (2016), a published measure of emotional connection to home; it is not a standardized adaptation of that instrument. Bowlby’s attachment framework supplies the broader concept of a meaningful bond associated with security.
Each answer receives a position on the five-point scale, and the catalogue converts the response pattern into the displayed result. The range alone does not establish item weights or a clinical cutoff. A 2022 cross-cultural study examined measurement invariance in the published short version; those findings do not validate this online questionnaire or establish norms for it.
Current housing conditions, mood, privacy, family relationships, and response candor can influence answers, so the score is best read as a snapshot of reported experience rather than a clinical conclusion.
- Reznichenko, Sofia I., Sofya K. Nartova-Bochaver, and Valeria B. Kuznetsova. (2016). The Instrument for Assessment of Home Attachment. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 13(3), 498-518. 10.17323/1813-8918-2016-3-498-518
- Nartova-Bochaver, Sofya, Sofia Reznichenko, Vasily Bardadymov, Milana Khachaturova, Victoria Yerofeyeva, Narine Khachatryan, Iryna Kryazh, Shanmukh Kamble, and Zulkarnain Zulkarnain. (2022). Measurement Invariance of the Short Home Attachment Scale: A Cross-Cultural Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 834421. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834421
- Bowlby, John. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Volume 1: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
Updated: