Female Sexual Formula Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I have never had any bleeding from the genital tract.
- Irregular bleeding from the genital tract, or regular bleeding from other sites (for example, nosebleeds).
- In recent years, my periods have become irregular or have stopped completely.
- My periods became irregular only under adverse conditions (for example, during significant stress, in summer, or after a change of residence).
- My periods have always remained regular, even under the most adverse conditions.
- Sexual intercourse has always caused an overwhelming feeling of disgust (or pain).
- For some time now, sexual intercourse has caused disgust, so I look for an excuse to avoid it.
- Sexual intercourse is indifferent to me, and I take part without inner desire (out of a sense of duty or to avoid conflict).
- Sexual intercourse is pleasurable, but the degree of enjoyment clearly depends on the phase of the menstrual cycle.
- Sexual intercourse always produces intense pleasure, regardless of the phase of the menstrual cycle.
- Never.
- At intervals of at least one year.
- Several times a year, but no more than once a month.
- Several times a month, but no more than once a week.
- About twice a week or more often.
- Daily, once or several times.
Female Sexual Formula Test - Description and methodology of the test
Women who want a structured way to examine sexual experiences, partner-related conditions, or past difficulties can use this questionnaire for focused self-reflection. The Female Sexual Formula Test organizes information across several stages of sexual functioning rather than reducing the result to one symptom. It can help readers recognize patterns in female sexual functioning, desire, arousal, orgasm, recovery, and cycle-related experience.
What This Assessment Measures
Women can see patterns in the sexual functioning profile.
Displayed scales:
- Disorder Duration (0-4) measures difficulty duration: Recent/short-term (0-2) or Long-standing (3-4).
- First Dyad (0-8) reflects preparation and emotional readiness: Low (0-5) or High (6-8).
- Second Dyad (0-8) covers arousal, readiness, and orgasm: Low (0-5), Moderate (6-7), or High (8-8).
- Third Dyad (0-8) describes physical and psychological response after intercourse, including recovery and emotional state: Low response/recovery (0-5) or High response/recovery (6-8).
- Fourth Dyad (0-8) reflects partner-provided activity and intercourse-duration prerequisites: Lower prerequisites (0-5), Moderate prerequisites (6-7), or Higher prerequisites (8-8).
- Overall (Prognostic) Index (0-36) summarizes functioning: Low (0-26) or High (27-36); higher scores may indicate harmonious functioning, while lower scores may suggest possible dysfunction.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item uses ordered choices rather than yes/no responses. The options distinguish timing, frequency, intensity, desire, bodily response, emotional reaction, partner-related circumstances, and menstrual patterns. Together, they ask the respondent to compare her experience with descriptions covering different stages of sexual functioning.
Results are reported on the displayed scales and Overall Index. The answer-to-score mapping is not specified, so readers should use the shown categories rather than reconstructing how each response contributes. As a sexual function questionnaire, it organizes reflection around the displayed dimensions.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the sexual-functioning framework discussed in Vasilchenko's 1977 guide. That relationship does not establish that the online form reproduces the source's format, norms, or validation.
A study by Airiyants and Yagubov discusses related patterns in coital anorgasmia. A later study by Yagubov, Dobaieva, and Airiyants describes a modified questionnaire and reports validation work. These studies provide context, not standardization for this digital form. Self-report is affected by current context, memory, relationship dynamics, and willingness to disclose, so the profile describes patterns rather than establishing a diagnosis.
- Vasilchenko, G. S. (ed.). General Sexopathology: A Guide for Physicians. Moscow: Meditsina, 1977, 488 pp.
- Airiyants, I. R., Yagubov, M. I. Latent Tendencies of Sexual Attraction in Women as a Cause of Coital Anorgasmia. Lechashchiy Vrach, 2018, no. 10, pp. 56-62.
- Yagubov, M. I., Doba(e)va, N. V., Airiyants, I. R. Development and Validation of a Modified Questionnaire for Vector Assessment of Female Sexual Constitution. Lechashchiy Vrach, 2026, no. 6, pp. 50-56. 10.51793/OS.2026.29.6.007
Updated: