Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
sexology

Female Sexual Formula Test

Take the online Female Sexual Formula Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Female Sexual Formula Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With nine questions completed in about two minutes, the Female Sexual Formula Test offers a structured look at sexual functioning, including desire, arousal, orgasm, recovery, partner-related conditions, and the duration of difficulties. Your result can support personal reflection and help you understand the pattern of factors shaping your sexual experience.
Questions: 92 minutes
Female Sexual Formula Test: situation and reply bubbles
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
28,615 views
2,516 completions
2,153 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
2,153 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Disorder DurationDD
Measures how long potential disturbances in sexual functioning have been present.
example score3/4
3/4Long-standingexample score
0 – 2Recent/short-term
3 – 4Long-standing
A score of 3 indicates the reported difficulties have likely been present for a long time rather than being recent.
Fourth DyadFD
Assesses indirect prerequisites for a woman’s sexual expression, such as partner-supported sexual activity level and typical intercourse duration.
example score5/8
5/8Lower prerequisitesexample score
0 – 5Lower prerequisites
6 – 7Moderate prerequisites
8Higher prerequisites
A score of 5 suggests comparatively lower partner-supported prerequisites for sexual activity and/or typical intercourse duration within this scale.
Third DyadTD
The Third Dyad measures a woman's physical recovery and emotional state following sexual intercourse.
example score3/8
3/8Low response/recoveryexample score
0 – 5Low response/recovery
6 – 8High response/recovery
A score of 3 falls in the Low response/recovery range, suggesting a comparatively weaker post-intercourse recovery and emotional aftereffect on this scale.
Second DyadSD
Assesses sexual intercourse performance parameters, including arousal/readiness to initiate sexual activity and capacity to reach orgasm.
example score4/8
4/8Lowexample score
0 – 5Low
6 – 7Moderate
8High
A score of 4 falls in the Low range, suggesting comparatively reduced arousal/readiness and/or orgasmic capacity during intercourse performance on this scale.
First DyadFD
Assesses preparatory processes and emotional readiness in the early stage of the copulatory cycle before the sexual act.
example score6/8
6/8Highexample score
0 – 5Low
6 – 8High
A score of 6 indicates a relatively high level of preparatory arousal and emotional readiness prior to the sexual act.
Overall (Prognostic) IndexOI
This scale summarizes overall sexual functioning across the main FSF parameters as a single prognostic indicator.
example score8/36
8/36Lowexample score
0 – 26Low
27 – 36High
A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting reduced overall sexual functioning across the assessed parameters compared with higher scores.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Women seeking clarity
44%OF USERS
Women who want a quick, structured snapshot of their sexual desire, preferences, and possible concerns before discussing them more deeply.
Sex therapy clients
33%OF USERS
Women already in counseling for issues like low desire, arousal difficulties, pain, or orgasm problems who need a baseline to guide treatment.
Couples in relationship strain
23%OF USERS
Women dealing with mismatched libido, communication problems, or dissatisfaction in a relationship who want objective talking points for therapy or joint discussions.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Duration of the disorderDotd
You?
Average2.1
Typical rangeTypical1.5 – 2.6
Possible0 – 4
The fourth dyadTfd
You?
Average4
Typical rangeTypical2.6 – 5.3
Possible0 – 8
The Third DyadTTD
You?
Average4.2
Typical rangeTypical3.1 – 5.3
Possible0 – 8
Second dyadSd
You?
Average2.3
Typical rangeTypical1.1 – 3.6
Possible0 – 8
The First DyadTFD
You?
Average2.2
Typical rangeTypical0.9 – 3.4
Possible0 – 8
Overall (prognostic) indicatorOi
You?
Average14.4
Typical rangeTypical8.1 – 20.8
Possible0 – 36
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I have never had any bleeding from the genital tract.
    • Irregular bleeding from the genital tract, or regular bleeding from other sites (for example, nosebleeds).
    • In recent years, my periods have become irregular or have stopped completely.
    • My periods became irregular only under adverse conditions (for example, during significant stress, in summer, or after a change of residence).
    • My periods have always remained regular, even under the most adverse conditions.
    • Sexual intercourse has always caused an overwhelming feeling of disgust (or pain).
    • For some time now, sexual intercourse has caused disgust, so I look for an excuse to avoid it.
    • Sexual intercourse is indifferent to me, and I take part without inner desire (out of a sense of duty or to avoid conflict).
    • Sexual intercourse is pleasurable, but the degree of enjoyment clearly depends on the phase of the menstrual cycle.
    • Sexual intercourse always produces intense pleasure, regardless of the phase of the menstrual cycle.
    • Never.
    • At intervals of at least one year.
    • Several times a year, but no more than once a month.
    • Several times a month, but no more than once a week.
    • About twice a week or more often.
    • Daily, once or several times.
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Female Sexual Formula Test - Description and methodology of the test

sexology

Women who want a structured way to examine sexual experiences, partner-related conditions, or past difficulties can use this questionnaire for focused self-reflection. The Female Sexual Formula Test organizes information across several stages of sexual functioning rather than reducing the result to one symptom. It can help readers recognize patterns in female sexual functioning, desire, arousal, orgasm, recovery, and cycle-related experience.

What This Assessment Measures

Women can see patterns in the sexual functioning profile.

Displayed scales:

  • Disorder Duration (0-4) measures difficulty duration: Recent/short-term (0-2) or Long-standing (3-4).
  • First Dyad (0-8) reflects preparation and emotional readiness: Low (0-5) or High (6-8).
  • Second Dyad (0-8) covers arousal, readiness, and orgasm: Low (0-5), Moderate (6-7), or High (8-8).
  • Third Dyad (0-8) describes physical and psychological response after intercourse, including recovery and emotional state: Low response/recovery (0-5) or High response/recovery (6-8).
  • Fourth Dyad (0-8) reflects partner-provided activity and intercourse-duration prerequisites: Lower prerequisites (0-5), Moderate prerequisites (6-7), or Higher prerequisites (8-8).
  • Overall (Prognostic) Index (0-36) summarizes functioning: Low (0-26) or High (27-36); higher scores may indicate harmonious functioning, while lower scores may suggest possible dysfunction.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item uses ordered choices rather than yes/no responses. The options distinguish timing, frequency, intensity, desire, bodily response, emotional reaction, partner-related circumstances, and menstrual patterns. Together, they ask the respondent to compare her experience with descriptions covering different stages of sexual functioning.

Results are reported on the displayed scales and Overall Index. The answer-to-score mapping is not specified, so readers should use the shown categories rather than reconstructing how each response contributes. As a sexual function questionnaire, it organizes reflection around the displayed dimensions.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the sexual-functioning framework discussed in Vasilchenko's 1977 guide. That relationship does not establish that the online form reproduces the source's format, norms, or validation.

A study by Airiyants and Yagubov discusses related patterns in coital anorgasmia. A later study by Yagubov, Dobaieva, and Airiyants describes a modified questionnaire and reports validation work. These studies provide context, not standardization for this digital form. Self-report is affected by current context, memory, relationship dynamics, and willingness to disclose, so the profile describes patterns rather than establishing a diagnosis.

Author: Virginia E. Johnson, William H. Masters
Literature:
  • Vasilchenko, G. S. (ed.). General Sexopathology: A Guide for Physicians. Moscow: Meditsina, 1977, 488 pp.
  • Airiyants, I. R., Yagubov, M. I. Latent Tendencies of Sexual Attraction in Women as a Cause of Coital Anorgasmia. Lechashchiy Vrach, 2018, no. 10, pp. 56-62.
  • Yagubov, M. I., Doba(e)va, N. V., Airiyants, I. R. Development and Validation of a Modified Questionnaire for Vector Assessment of Female Sexual Constitution. Lechashchiy Vrach, 2026, no. 6, pp. 50-56. 10.51793/OS.2026.29.6.007

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment