Symptom Checklist of Well-Being Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Symptom Checklist of Well-Being Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers trying to understand how stress may be affecting everyday functioning, the Symptom Checklist of Well-Being Test offers a structured profile rather than a single general score. It is relevant to people noticing changes in mood, sleep, energy, bodily sensations, self-control, or social adjustment. This stress symptom checklist can show which areas stand out and provide a focused starting point for self-reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
It examines psychological, physical, behavioral, and functional stress signs. As a well-being questionnaire, it shows where strain or adaptation difficulty is concentrated. The result groups them as follows:
- Anxiety and Fears (0-6) measures worry and fear: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-4; High 5-6.
- Maladaptation (0-6) measures adjustment difficulty: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-4; High 5-6.
- Sleep Disturbances (0-6) measures sleep problems: Low disturbance 0-2; Moderate disturbance 3-4; High disturbance 5-6.
- Autonomic Instability (0-6) measures bodily stress reactions: Low 0-2; Moderate 3-4; High 5-6.
- Emotional Instability (0-6) measures mood lability: Stable 0-2; Moderate lability 3-4; High instability 5-6.
- Volitional Impairment (0-6) measures self-regulation: Intact will 0-2; Reduced will 3-4; Marked disruption 5-6.
- Psychophysical Fatigue (0-6) measures stress-related tiredness: Low fatigue 0-2; Moderate fatigue 3-4; High fatigue 5-6.
- Total Neuroticism Index (0-42) measures adaptation and stress tolerance: Low 0-15; Moderate 16-26; High 27-42.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item is a brief Yes-or-No statement covering intrusive thoughts, fears, mood, withdrawal, sleep, fatigue, motivation, social strain, substance or alcohol coping, and bodily reactions. Endorsement is recorded, not frequency, intensity, duration, or cause.
The result reports seven domain scores and one combined index. Higher scores generally reflect more endorsed difficulties, but the displayed ranges do not reveal the item key or each answer’s weighting. Lower total scores indicate better adaptation and stress tolerance; higher totals may signal more pronounced neurotic symptoms. The bands organize a profile rather than a universal severity rule.
The closest conceptual reference is the Volkov-Vodopyanova questionnaire (2009). This form is conceptually consistent with that work, not automatically a standardized adaptation. Ekimova et al. (2020) connect related stress and adaptation measures with rescue-diver success, while Kuzyukova et al. (2025) review this questionnaire among stress-assessment instruments.
Because this stress assessment questionnaire relies on self-report, current context, self-awareness, and response bias can affect results; its bands are not universal clinical cutoffs, and this form does not establish norms, reliability, or diagnostic validity.
- Volkov, A., & Vodopyanova, N. (2009). Symptomatic Questionnaire “Well-Being in Extreme Conditions.” In N. E. Vodopyanova (Ed.), Psychodiagnostics of Stress: Workshop (pp. 31-33). St. Petersburg: Piter.
- Ekimova, V., Frolova, A., Kokurin, A., & Koteneva, A. (2020). Prognostic Model of Professional Successfulness of Rescue-Divers. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal, 41(1), 31-44. 10.31857/S020595920007314-1
- Kuzyukova, A. A., Pekhova, Y. G., Odarushenko, O. I., Levchenko, N. A., & Marchenkova, L. A. (2025). Current Scales and Questionnaires for Assessing Stress Conditions and Their Application in Medicine: a Review. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine, 24(2), 71-86. 10.38025/2078-1962-2025-24-2-71-86
Updated: