Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
creativity

Thinking Profile Test

Take the online Thinking Profile Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Thinking Profile Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how you take in and process information across key thinking styles in about 14 minutes. Get clear, visual results from 75 items to spot strengths, creativity, and growth areas for school or work.
Start Online Test
Questions: 7514 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
22,770 views
1,395 completions
1,161 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
6/15
Creativity (C)
Creativity measures the tendency to use original, unconventional approaches and generate unique solutions or products.
Low
Moderate
High
05: Low | 69: Moderate | 1015: High
A score of 6 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a generally conventional style with some readiness to try novel ideas when the situation supports it.
example score
6/15
Visual-Imaginative Thinking (VIT)
Measures how effectively a person can manipulate mental images from memory or imagination to support creative problem-solving.
Low
Average
High
05: Low | 69: Average | 1015: High
A score of 6 falls in the Average range, suggesting a functional ability to work with mental images that may be applied in creative tasks with some effort.
example score
2/15
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Measures how readily a person reasons using abstract signs and concepts rather than relying on concrete objects or images.
Low
Moderate
High
05: Low | 69: Moderate | 1015: High
A score of 2 indicates low sign-based thinking, suggesting the person may rely more on concrete or visual information than on abstract concepts and verbal reasoning in similar tasks.
example score
7/15
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Measures how effectively a person transforms information using symbols, numbers, and formal rules of inference to produce formula-like or program-like solutions.
Low
Moderate
High
05: Low | 69: Moderate | 1015: High
A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting an average ability to work with symbols and formal rules when solving problems.
example score
10/15
Object-Based Thinking (OBT)
Measures the tendency to process information through real objects and hands-on, step-by-step actions to produce practical outcomes.
Lower
Moderate
Higher
06: Lower | 79: Moderate | 1015: Higher
A score of 10 indicates a higher level of concrete thinking, suggesting a preference for practical, sequential problem-solving with tangible materials or actions.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

HR and Talent Teams
41%OF USERS
Use it to map candidates’ and employees’ thinking styles for role fit, training needs, and development planning.
Psychologists and Coaches
34%OF USERS
Take it to quickly build a clear profile of strengths across different thinking modes and guide targeted improvement.
Teachers and School Counselors
25%OF USERS
Use the school-friendly version to understand how a student processes information and choose better learning approaches.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Creativity (C)
Creativity (C)
Average
8.2
Normal range
6.110.4
min.
0
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Figurative Thinking (FT)
Figurative Thinking (FT)
Average
8.9
Normal range
7.110.8
min.
0
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Sign-based Thinking (ST)
Sign-based Thinking (ST)
Average
9.9
Normal range
7.412.5
min.
0
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Symbolic Thinking (ST)
Average
7.8
Normal range
5.510.2
min.
0
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Concrete Thinking (CT)
Concrete Thinking (CT)
Average
8.8
Normal range
6.611
min.
0
max.
15
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

Each person tends to have a predominant thinking style. This questionnaire will help identify your thinking style. If you agree with a statement, respond “Yes”; otherwise, respond “No.”
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment
Thinking Profile Test

Thinking Profile Test - Symptoms and Signs

creativity
thinking style

This measure is designed to characterize individual differences in cognitive processing and preferred modes of reasoning. Thinking Profile is a brief, structured set of tasks intended to sample performance across multiple representational formats relevant to everyday learning and problem solving.

The instrument contains 75 items and typically requires about 14 minutes to complete. Items emphasize problem solving with concrete content, visual imagery, and use of symbols and signs, with a focus on describing relative strengths across thinking approaches.

Thinking Profile may be used in educational, vocational, or clinical-adjunct contexts to inform discussion of learning strategies and skill development. Bibliographic attribution is commonly given to Robert J. Sternberg and Richard J. Davidson.

Author: Richard J. Davidson, Robert J. Sternberg
Literature: Kahneman, D. Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 2011.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment