Orientation Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Being evaluated for your work.
- Knowing that the work has been done well.
- Knowing that you are among friends.
- The coach who develops the game strategy.
- A famous player.
- Chosen as the team captain.
- Help others when the opportunity arises.
- Are always loyal and reliable.
- Are well-educated and have broad interests.
Orientation Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand what drives their choices in teams, study, or work can use the Orientation Questionnaire Test to consider everyday choices. The resulting self-report profile helps you reflect on preferred roles, shared responsibilities, and sources of engagement across everyday situations. It also highlights tensions between cooperation, achievement, and personal priorities.
What This Assessment Measures
Three dimensions organize the resulting motivation profile. They show what a respondent tends to prioritize in goals, relationships, and success. Across these three orientations, no single emphasis is automatically healthier; a high score indicates a stronger emphasis on that motive.
The displayed scales are:
- Task Orientation (0-67) reflects effective performance, initiative, responsibility, professional cooperation, and concrete results. Low 0-20; Moderate 21-49; High 50-67.
- Interaction Orientation (0-67) reflects positive relationships, communication, joint activity, and a supportive group atmosphere, which may sometimes compete with task completion. Low interaction focus 0-20; Moderate interaction focus 21-49; High interaction focus 50-67.
- Self-Oriented Orientation (0-67) reflects personal well-being, primacy, prestige, and recognition, sometimes with less attention to colleagues’ needs. Low 0-20; Moderate 21-49; High 50-67.
The questions span work, study, friendship, leisure, and personal aims, so the result describes motivational emphasis rather than a character label.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item offers three answer choices, and the respondent selects the alternative that best matches their preference. The questionnaire presents three separate scores, but the scoring display does not establish a universal point value for every response. Bands should therefore be read as descriptive positions within this questionnaire, not as percentiles or clinical cutoffs.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Smekal-Kucher Orientation Questionnaire described by Rean (1999), while Bass’s Orientation Inventory and his later review provide a related framework for considering task, interaction, self-directed motives, and social behavior. This online version is not identified as a standardized adaptation of either instrument.
This online tool works as a personality orientation questionnaire for noticing recurring preferences in a role or group setting. This version has no stated normative sample or reliability estimate. Because answers are self-reported, results can shift with current circumstances, self-awareness, and the wish to appear favorably; high-stakes conclusions require broader assessment.
- Rean, A. A. (1999). Study of Personality Orientation (V. Smekal and M. Kucher’s Method). In Psychology of Personality Study: Textbook (pp. 47-54). St. Petersburg: Mikhailov V. A. Publishing House.
- Bass, B. M. (1962). The Orientation Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
- Bass, B. M. (1967). Social Behavior and the Orientation Inventory: A Review. Psychological Bulletin, 68(4), 260-292. 10.1037/h0025075
Updated: