Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
childhood trauma

Developmental Age-Related Problems Test

Take the online Developmental Age-Related Problems Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Developmental Age-Related Problems Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In eight minutes, the Developmental Age-Related Problems Test uses 42 yes-or-no questions to explore patterns linked with different developmental stages. Your profile can highlight possible difficulties involving trust, identity, relationships, structure, or independence, offering a practical starting point for self-reflection and more focused personal understanding.
Questions: 428 minutes
Developmental Age-Related Problems Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
17,105 views
1,634 completions
1,323 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,323 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Ages 12-18A11
Measures difficulties related to adolescent identity formation, separation from parents, emerging sexuality, and competence development (ages 12–18).
example score62/100
62/100Elevated riskexample score
0 – 49Low risk
50 – 100Elevated risk
A score of 62 falls in the Elevated risk range, suggesting more pronounced unresolved tasks around identity, autonomy from parents, and integrating sexuality/competence during adolescence.
Ages 3–6 YearsA36Y
Measures the degree to which unresolved challenges from ages 3–6 (identity, autonomy, social roles, and authority in relationships) are reflected in current patterns of difficulty.
example score76/100
76/100Highexample score
0 – 33Low
34 – 66Moderate
67 – 100High
A score of 76 falls in the High range, suggesting this age period may be a notable “bottleneck” where themes of autonomy, role-taking, or authority in relationships remain especially salient.
6 Months to 3 Years6Mt3Y
Measures how many unresolved difficulties may be linked to the 6 months–3 years stage of early trust, exploration, sensory reliance, and supported initiative.
example score23/100
23/100Lowexample score
0 – 33Low
34 – 66Moderate
67 – 100High
A score of 23 falls in the Low range, suggesting relatively few indicators of unresolved challenges from this early stage and generally adequate foundations for trust and exploration.
0–6 Months06M
Assesses how securely basic trust, safety, and the expectation that needs will be met were formed in the 0–6 month developmental period.
example score37/100
37/100Lowexample score
0 – 39Low
40 – 69Moderate
70 – 100High
A score of 37 falls in the Low range, suggesting this early period may be associated with weaker foundations of basic trust and safety that can be a focus for further exploration.
6-12 Years61Y
Measures the extent of unresolved developmental tasks from ages 6–12 related to internal structure, rule acceptance, and skill acquisition.
example score26/100
26/100Low risk indicatorsexample score
0 – 33Low risk indicators
34 – 66Moderate risk indicators
67 – 100High risk indicators
A score of 26 falls in the Low risk indicators range, suggesting relatively few signs of unmet needs around rules, routines, and skills from the 6–12 period.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Adults seeking self-understanding
41%OF USERS
People who notice repeating relationship, confidence, or life-direction issues and want to trace them back to unmet childhood developmental tasks.
Therapy and coaching clients
34%OF USERS
Those already working with a psychologist or coach who want a quick map of which age period may hold the core block to focus sessions.
Psychologists and counselors
25%OF USERS
Practitioners who use brief screening tools to identify likely developmental “bottlenecks” and choose deeper assessment or correction methods.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
12-18 years old1yo
You?
Average37.6
Typical rangeTypical19 – 56.2
Possible0 – 100
3-6 years3y
You?
Average38.7
Typical rangeTypical25.6 – 51.9
Possible0 – 100
6 months – 3 years6m–3y
You?
Average60.4
Typical rangeTypical45.6 – 75.2
Possible0 – 100
0-6 months0m
You?
Average65.9
Typical rangeTypical52 – 79.8
Possible0 – 100
6-12 years old6yo
You?
Average34.4
Typical rangeTypical20.6 – 48.3
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Developmental Age-Related Problems Test - Description and methodology of the test

childhood trauma
transactional analysis
age

For adults reflecting on recurring patterns in trust, independence, identity, relationships, or self-control, the Developmental Age-Related Problems Test offers a stage-oriented way to organize those concerns. Rather than asking for a single global judgment, it links present reactions to developmental tasks and periods, helping explain why familiar responses may arise. The resulting profile can help you choose themes for further reflection.

What the Assessment Explores

The profile connects everyday concerns with basic trust, exploration, identity, social roles, rules, competence, separation, and sexuality across developmental stages. It suits reflection when these themes appear in relationships or behavior. The five displayed scales are:

  • 0-6 Months (0-100) covers basic trust and expecting needs to be met; Low 0-39, Moderate 40-69, High 70-100.
  • 6 Months to 3 Years (0-100) covers trust, exploration, bodily awareness, and creativity; Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, High 67-100.
  • Ages 3-6 Years (0-100) covers identity, social skills, and roles or power in relationships; Low 0-33, Moderate 34-66, High 67-100.
  • 6-12 Years (0-100) covers inner structure, rules, and practical skills; Low risk indicators 0-33, Moderate risk indicators 34-66, High risk indicators 67-100.
  • Ages 12-18 (0-100) covers identity, separation, sexuality, and competence; Low risk 0-49, Elevated risk 50-100.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Items use binary yes-or-no self-report prompts. They touch on self-care, abandonment, uncertainty, emotional control, guilt, comparison, conflict, authority, closeness, rules, achievement, and follow-through. A binary response records whether the respondent endorses a pattern, but leaves its frequency, context, severity, and cause unknown.

Conceptually, the questionnaire is consistent with Critical Points of Development Questionnaire (Goussakovski, 2000), while remaining a separate online questionnaire rather than a documented adaptation of it. Its developmental framing also aligns with Bradshaw (1991) and Levin-Landheer (1982); Golovan (2015) shows related transactional-analysis use of developmental script themes.

Results from this questionnaire are organized around age-related development, with scores for each displayed area and the stated bands shown alongside them. The bands label the result ranges for each scale, but they do not explain causes or establish a diagnosis. No normative sample, reliability estimate, or item-level weighting is stated for this form, so the results work best as structured prompts for reflection. Current stress, memory, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose can also influence responses.

Author: Michael Rutter
Literature:
  • Goussakovski, Vladimir. (2000). Critical Points of Development Questionnaire. Unpublished questionnaire, based on John Bradshaw’s developmental material and taught via Patricia J. Cox.
  • Golovan, Ganna. (2015). A pilot study to investigate and analyse script components of hospitalised individuals in Ukraine diagnosed with schizophrenia paranoid sub-type. International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research, 6(1), 54-69. 10.29044/v6i1p54
  • Bradshaw, John. (1991). Homecoming: Reclaiming and Championing Your Inner Child. London: Piatkus Books.
  • Levin-Landheer, Pam. (1982). The Cycle of Development. Transactional Analysis Journal, 12(2), 129-139. 10.1177/036215378201200207

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment