Orientational-Diagnostic Interests Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Would like it very much, enjoy doing this
- Like it, but not very much
- Unsure
- Would not like to, do not like it
- Would strongly dislike it, do not like it at all
- Would very much like to; like doing this
- Like it, but not very much
- Not sure
- Would not like to; do not like it
- Would very much not like to; do not like it at all
- Would very much like to; enjoy doing this
- Like it, but not very much
- Difficult to say
- Would not like to; do not enjoy it
- Would very much not like to; do not enjoy it at all
Orientational-Diagnostic Interests Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People comparing study choices, subject priorities, or possible career directions can use the Orientational-Diagnostic Interests Questionnaire Test to organize preferences across many fields. As an occupational interests questionnaire, it turns reactions to familiar activities into a profile of stronger and weaker attractions. The result offers a starting point for weighing options alongside experience, abilities, and values.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions cover subjects, tasks, roles, creative activities, and occupations. A career interest test shows clustered or varied preferences.
The items below group preferences into five dimensions; scales run -12-12, and bands follow Low interest/Moderate interest/High interest order (Technology: Low/Moderate/High). Patterns A-G: A -12-0/1-7/8-12; B -12--6/-5-4/5-12; C -12--5/-4-4/5-12; D -12--1/0-4/5-12; E -12-0/1-4/5-12; F -12-4/5-7/8-12; G -12--6/-5-5/6-12.
- Humanities and communication covers history, art, language, and text: History A; Art E; Philology and Journalism C.
- Earth sciences covers natural processes, organisms, substances, and experiments: Geography and Geology B; Biology A; Chemistry A.
- Technical reasoning covers logic, phenomena, machinery, circuits, and invention: Mathematics A; Physics A; Technology G; Electronics and Radio Engineering E.
- Care and service covers caregiving, teaching, child development, and service: Medicine C; Education B; Domestic Services D.
- Action and enterprise covers sport, independent business, and military themes: Sports C; Entrepreneurship A; Military Service F.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses five response choices, moving from strong enjoyment through mild liking and uncertainty to dislike. Activities include reading, discussing, organizing, experimenting, helping, repairing, competing, and supervising, so the profile compares attraction to subject matter with attraction to kinds of activity. Answers become domain scores from -12 to 12, then appear in displayed low, moderate, or high bands. These are the questionnaire’s categories, not population norms or clinical cutoffs.
The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with ODAI (Golomshtok & Meshkovskaya, 2003) but is not presented as an adaptation of that published instrument. It also fits Golomshtok’s vocational-guidance tradition and Holland’s vocational-personality and work-environment model. Bagova et al. (2019) provides related school self-determination context, not validation of this version. As a career choice assessment, the profile suggests themes for exploration; mood, socially desirable answers, limited self-knowledge, and unfamiliarity with an activity can influence self-report. Compare it with experience and developing skills rather than treating one occupational preference as a final decision.
- Rybalko, V. (Comp.), Maksymenko, S., & Hlavnyk, O. (Eds.). (2003). Orientational Diagnostic Questionnaire of Interests (ODANI) by A. E. Golomshtok and O. I. Meshkovskaya. In Student’s Readiness for Profile Education (pp. 73-80). Kyiv: Mikros-SVS.
- Golomshtok, A. E. (Ed.). (1968). Professional Guidance Work in School. Kaluga: Prioksky Book Publishing House, 118 pp.
- Holland, John L. (1985). Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Vocational Personalities and Work Environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Bagova, R., Baysieva, L., Mikhaylenko, O., & Nogerova, M. (2019). Features of Professional Self-Determination of Modern Schoolchildren in the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic. In Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism, Vol. 58, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences (pp. 150-156). Future Academy. 10.15405/epsbs.2019.03.02.18
Updated: