Temperament Structure Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Temperament Structure Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to examine their usual patterns of energy, pace, flexibility, emotional balance, and sociability can use the Temperament Structure Self-Assessment Questionnaire Test as a structured self-reflection tool. It suits readers interested in how characteristic reactions appear across everyday situations and what a combined profile may suggest about behavioral style. A temperament self-assessment is most informative when answers describe recurring tendencies rather than a temporary mood.
What This Assessment Explores
Questions address activity, persistence, speed, social contact, emotional stability and anxiety, hesitation, and adjustment to change. A temperament questionnaire turns these everyday patterns into a profile intended for personal reflection, not a single all-purpose label.
The displayed dimensions are:
- Activity (0-26) reflects energy and goal-directed striving: Low 0-8, Moderate 9-20, High 21-26.
- Reaction Tempo (0-22) reflects mental, motor, and speech speed: Slower pace 0-5, Typical pace 6-13, Faster pace 14-22.
- Rigidity (0-23) reflects flexibility versus resistance to change: Flexible 0-8, Balanced 9-13, Rigid 14-23.
- Neuroticism (0-20) reflects emotional stability and propensity toward anxiety: Low 0-7, Moderate 8-13, High 14-20.
- Extraversion (0-26) reflects outward orientation and sociability: Low 0-7, Moderate 8-18, High 19-26.
- Sincerity Scale (0-20) indicates response validity and reliability: Low reliability 0-7, Acceptable reliability 8-12, High reliability 13-20.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
The representative questions describe familiar situations and use yes-or-no responses. Answers are converted into separate scale totals, but the questionnaire does not state how many points each answer contributes or which direction each answer takes. The displayed ranges should therefore be read through the listed result bands rather than reverse-engineered.
In this format, the questionnaire functions as a temperament test using self-report: the result reflects the respondent’s view of typical behavior. The profile can support comparisons among tendencies, while the reliability measure helps indicate how cautiously to read the pattern.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with Smirnov’s (2001) temperament-structure questionnaire. This online version is not presented as a validated digital reproduction or adaptation.
Rothbart and Derryberry (1981) provide a broader framework for individual differences in temperament. These sources do not establish norms or clinical validity for this version.
Scores are best read as context-dependent tendencies. Mood, current stress, self-awareness, and the wish to present oneself favorably can shape self-report, so the profile is not a diagnosis or a complete account of personality.
- Smirnov, B. N. (2001). Questionnaire “Study of the Psychological Structure of Temperament.” In E. P. Ilyin (Ed.), Differential Psychophysiology (pp. 344-346). St. Petersburg: Peter Publishing House.
- Kolesnichenko, O., Matsegora, Y., Prykhodko, I., Shandruk, S., Larionov, S., Izbash, S., Vavryk, L., Khanenko, I., Andrusyshyn, Y., & Tishechkina, K. (2021). Typology of Personal Characteristics of Cadets Who Use Psychoactive Substances. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 21(3), 347-361.
- Rothbart, M. K., & Derryberry, D. (1981). Development of individual differences in temperament. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Developmental Psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 37-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 10.4324/9780203728185
Updated: