Career Values Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- It would be the deciding factor if I could see how my role contributed to that mission
- It would matter, but I would weigh it equally with pay, development, and working conditions
- It would be a welcome bonus after my practical requirements were met
- I would focus mainly on the role itself and pursue personal causes outside work
- Receiving my next individual objective and returning to focused work
- Briefly acknowledging everyone’s contribution before moving on
- Reviewing lessons together and recognizing how colleagues supported the result
- Celebrating as a group and strengthening the relationships built during the project
- Very little; I am comfortable adapting as opportunities emerge
- A broad direction, while leaving major decisions open
- A realistic plan for the next few years with room for revision
- Clear expectations, dependable conditions, and a well-defined path I can plan around
Career Values Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People weighing a career change can use the causative quiz to examine how mission, security, challenge, relationships, and independence shape decisions about roles and workplaces. Instead of assigning one ideal occupation, it produces a comparative profile showing which value priorities are stronger or less central. Students, job seekers, and working adults can use this causative verbs quiz to read that pattern as a map of the trade-offs a role may present.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than matching a person to a job title, the assessment maps preferences that shape daily work. For someone comparing offers, it functions as a causative verb test for clarifying workplace needs and reconsidering a direction. Higher or lower results show relative importance, not ability, morality, or guaranteed outcomes.
The profile contains five dimensions:
- Autonomy & Flexibility (0-12) describes a preference for structure, visible guardrails, and predictable arrangements versus independence and flexibility in methods, priorities, schedule, or location: Structure-Oriented (0-4), Selectively Independent (5-8), Autonomy-Driven (9-12).
- Connection & Belonging (0-12) measures workplace closeness: Independently Oriented (0-4), Collaborative (5-8), Connection-Driven (9-12).
- Mastery & Challenge (0-12) measures appetite for development: Competence in Context (0-4), Growth-Minded (5-8), Mastery-Driven (9-12).
- Purpose & Contribution (0-12) measures desired impact: Purpose Beyond the Role (0-4), Contribution-Conscious (5-8), Purpose-Driven (9-12).
- Security & Predictability (0-12) measures preference for continuity: Change-Tolerant (0-4), Stability-Conscious (5-8), Security-Driven (9-12).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a workplace situation with four response options covering mission, planning, social climate, challenge, scheduling, compensation, and independence. The alternatives represent different priorities within those situations, while the questionnaire reports results across five displayed scales; its point allocation is not specified.
Each displayed scale uses a 0-12 range with a named band. Compare priorities within the profile instead of treating small differences as precise.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Multidimensional Career Values Questionnaire (Abessolo et al., 2021), which combines several work-value perspectives. It is also conceptually consistent with the New Work Values Scale (Stiglbauer et al., 2022) and WVal (Consiglio et al., 2017). This causative verbs test is an online self-reflection tool, not an adaptation of those instruments; their norms and psychometric findings therefore do not transfer to these online scores.
Interpretation should consider current circumstances, recent work experiences, and the situation imagined while answering. Self-awareness and impression management can affect responses, so compare the profile with concrete role information rather than treating it as a diagnosis.
- Abessolo, M., Hirschi, A., & Rossier, J. (2021). Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Career Values Questionnaire: A Measure Integrating Work Values, Career Orientations, and Career Anchors. Journal of Career Development, 48(3), 243-259. 10.1177/0894845319846567
- Stiglbauer, B., Penz, M., & Batinic, B. (2022). Work values across generations: Development of the New Work Values Scale (NWVS) and examination of generational differences. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1028072. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028072
- Consiglio, C., Cenciotti, R., Borgogni, L., Alessandri, G., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). The WVal: A New Measure of Work Values. Journal of Career Assessment, 25(3), 405-422. 10.1177/1069072716639691
Updated: