Self-Confidence Scale (RAS) Test
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Very characteristic of me; the description is very true
- Quite characteristic of me; more yes than no
- Partly characteristic and partly not characteristic
- Not very characteristic of me; more no than yes
- Not at all characteristic of me; the description is not true
- Very true of me
- Mostly true of me; more yes than no
- Partly true, partly not true
- Mostly not true of me; more no than yes
- Not at all true of me
- Very characteristic of me; very true of me
- Fairly characteristic of me; more yes than no
- Partly characteristic, partly uncharacteristic
- Fairly uncharacteristic of me; more no than yes
- Not at all characteristic of me; not true of me
Self-Confidence Scale (RAS) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand how directly they communicate, set boundaries, or speak under pressure may find this assessment useful. The Self-Confidence Scale (RAS) Test offers a structured snapshot of assertive behavior for personal reflection across everyday social situations. As a self-confidence assessment, it can highlight patterns in expressing needs while leaving room for context, learning, and change.
What This Assessment Explores
This questionnaire examines how comfortably a person states preferences, asks for needs, responds to unfairness, and speaks when interaction feels awkward. It suits readers reflecting on everyday communication, including reluctance to refuse requests or challenge another person's view.
The items make assertiveness concrete through situations such as:
- Expressing opinions shows how readily you state a viewpoint when others disagree.
- Setting boundaries reflects comfort with saying no, questioning requests, and protecting your interests.
- Handling disagreement captures responses to complaints, bargaining, conflict, and disruptive behavior.
- Social approach describes ease with unfamiliar people, invitations, compliments, calls, and interviews.
As an assertiveness test, the result describes a reported tendency toward direct self-expression, not a fixed identity. Higher confidence suggests greater willingness to defend interests and voice opinions; lower confidence may accompany inhibition or compliance, while a middle result suggests balance.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
This self-report format uses five response options, from very characteristic or true of me to not at all characteristic or true. Items describe direct behavior alongside hesitation, avoidance, embarrassment, and difficulty speaking up. Answer for your usual reactions, not an ideal self-image.
The online result combines responses into one score. Self-Confidence spans 0-120: Low confidence 0-48, Moderate confidence 49-96, and High confidence 97-120. These bands belong to this questionnaire; the range does not reveal how many points any single answer contributes.
Its content is conceptually consistent with the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule (Rathus, 1973), a published 30-item measure. Quillin, Besing, and Dinning (1977) studied its standardization, while Rathus and Nevid (1977) examined concurrent validity in a psychiatric population. Their findings provide context for the construct, not proof that this online version shares the same norms or clinical meaning.
As a self-confidence questionnaire, the result is best read with the situations behind it. Current mood, recent interactions, self-awareness, and social desirability can influence self-report, so the score reflects reported tendencies rather than a diagnosis.
- Rathus, S. A. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 4(3), 398-406. 10.1016/S0005-7894(73)80120-0
- Quillin, J., Besing, S., & Dinning, D. (1977). Standardization of the Rathus Assertiveness Schedule. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 33(2), 418-422. 10.1002/1097-4679(197704)33:2<418::AID-JCLP2270330217>3.0.CO;2-Y
- Rathus, S. A., & Nevid, J. S. (1977). Concurrent validity of the 30-item assertiveness schedule with a psychiatric population. Behavior Therapy, 8(3), 393-397. 10.1016/S0005-7894(77)80074-9
Updated: