Character Traits Questionnaire (CTQ-20) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Not true of me
- Somewhat untrue of me
- True of me
- Clearly true of me
- Very true of me
- Not true
- Rather untrue
- True
- Clearly true
- Very clearly true
- Not present
- Probably not present
- Present
- Clearly present
- Very strongly present
Character Traits Questionnaire (CTQ-20) Test - Description and methodology of the test
Readers deciding whether to take a self-report questionnaire can use this assessment, which provides a multidimensional profile of several character-related tendencies. The Character Traits Questionnaire (CTQ-20) Test gives them a structured basis for self-reflection rather than a single defining label. Answers are most useful when they describe typical patterns rather than an isolated reaction or unusually difficult day.
What This Assessment Explores
It examines emotional, energetic, expressive, impulsive, and organizational tendencies; this character traits assessment maps these dimensions:
- Cyclothymia (2-10) measures mood shifts: Stable 2-4, Moderate variability 5-7, Pronounced swings 8-10. Emotionality (2-10) reflects depth, sensitivity, compassion: Low 2-4, Average 5-7, High 8-10.
- Exaltation (2-10) captures intense enthusiasm. Anxiety (2-10) reflects fear and worry. Both: Low 2-4, Moderate 5-7, High 8-10.
- Dysthymia (2-10), Hyperthymia (2-10), Pedantry (2-10), and Demonstrativeness (2-10) respectively measure low mood, passivity, withdrawal; activity, initiative, cheerfulness; orderliness, caution; expressiveness, attention seeking. All: Low 2-5, Moderate 6-7, High 8-10.
- Excitability (2-10) reflects impulsive intensity: Low 2-4, Moderate 5-7, High 8-10. Perseveration (2-10) reflects persistent emotions, resentments, difficulty forgiving: Low 2-5, Moderate 6-8, High 9-10.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item is a self-report statement rated on five points, moving from a low or absent indication to an increasingly clear, strong, or pronounced indication. The items address organizing behavior, sensitivity, fear, mood changes, attention seeking, anger, activity, and persistence, linking concrete situations with broader patterns in the resulting profile. Respondents should compare each statement with their usual pattern rather than an isolated event.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Schmieschek Questionnaire (Schmieschek, 1970), and its dimensions correspond to Leonhard’s theory of accentuated personalities. Littmann and Schmieschek (1977) support the relevance of shortened questionnaires for identifying accentuated tendencies, while Rada and Ispas (2016) provide an applied example of the framework, not validation of this form.
The scoring display converts responses into profile results, but the form does not specify the response-to-score conversion or provide normative samples, reliability estimates, or clinical cutoffs. This personality profile test is therefore best interpreted by looking for converging themes across dimensions. Self-report can be influenced by mood, self-awareness, and impression management, so the result describes present responses rather than proving a fixed character structure.
- Schmieschek, H. (1970). Questionnaire for the Determination of Accentuated Personalities. Psychiatrie, Neurologie und medizinische Psychologie, 22(10), 378-381.
- Leonhard, K. (1968). Accentuated Personalities. Berlin: Verlag Volk und Gesundheit.
- Littmann, E., & Schmieschek, H. G. (1977). Usefulness of Shortened Questionnaires for Detection of Accentuated Personalities. Psychiatrie, Neurologie und medizinische Psychologie, 29(1), 49-55.
- Rada, C., & Ispas, A. T. (2016). Alcohol consumption and accentuated personality traits among young adults in Romania: a cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 11, Article 36. 10.1186/s13011-016-0080-3
Updated: