Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who notice unusual perceptions, mistrust, social unease, or distinctive communication may use this questionnaire to organize those experiences into a profile. The schizotypal personality disorder test is intended for people reflecting on how several schizotypal features appear in daily life. It considers these experiences together, so the result can show patterns rather than one decisive response. A schizotypal test can support a focused view of the areas that stand out.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than treating an unusual experience as decisive, the assessment maps perception, belief, communication, behavior, affect, and relationships. Items address hidden meanings, unusual sensations, mistrust, social nervousness, limited closeness, topic shifts, eccentric actions, and reduced emotional expression. The profile from this schizotypal traits test shows which areas are most prominent.
The displayed result groups these themes into dimensions and an overall score:
- Perceptual-Cognitive 0-33 (Low 0-11; Moderate 12-22; High 23-33) combines unusual sensations, magical thinking, and ideas of reference.
- Interpersonal Relationships 0-33 (Low 0-10; Moderate 11-22; High 23-33) reflects trust, closeness, and social tension.
- Disorganization 0-16 (Low 0-5; Moderate 6-10; High 11-16) covers odd speech and behavior.
- Constricted Affect 0-8 (Low 0-2; Elevated 3-8) reflects reduced emotional responsiveness.
- Total Score 0-74 (Low 0-12; Moderate 13-40; Elevated 41-74) summarizes overall schizotypal traits; 41 is an author-selected risk threshold, not proof of pathology.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item uses a Yes/No self-report format. Affirmative responses are summed into the relevant facet, grouping, and total score; the catalogue does not state a separate weighting rule. This makes results depend on how the respondent understands and answers each statement.
The structure is conceptually consistent with Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (Raine, 1991), a self-report measure organized around schizotypal features described in DSM-III-R. It is presented here as an online questionnaire, not as a normed clinical adaptation. Research by Fonseca-Pedrero and colleagues (2014) and Chan and colleagues (2019) adds context on self-reported traits and clinician-rated features.
When reading this schizotypal personality test, treat the bands as indicators of relative prominence within the questionnaire. Published findings show that mean scores can differ between nonclinical and clinical samples, and scoring above a sample mean does not automatically indicate disorder. Current stress, self-awareness, response style, and social context can influence answers, so the result is best read as a structured description of reported experiences rather than a standalone clinical conclusion.
- Raine, Adrian. (1991). The SPQ: A Scale for the Assessment of Schizotypal Personality Based on DSM-III-R Criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17(4), 555-564. 10.1093/schbul/17.4.555
- Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo, Fumero, Ascensión, Paino, Mercedes, de Miguel, Adelia, Ortuño-Sierra, Javier, Lemos-Giráldez, Serafín, and Muñiz, José. (2014). Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire: New Sources of Validity Evidence in College Students. Psychiatry Research, 219(1), 214-220. 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.04.054
- Chan, Chi C., Bulbena-Cabre, Andrea, Rutter, Sarah, Benavides, Caridad, McClure, Margaret M., Calabrese, William, Rosell, Daniel R., Koenigsberg, Harold W., Goodman, Marianne, New, Antonia S., Hazlett, Erin A., and Perez-Rodriguez, M. Mercedes. (2019). Comparison of Self-Report and Clinician-Rated Schizotypal Traits in Schizotypal Personality Disorder and Community Controls. Schizophrenia Research, 209, 263-268. 10.1016/j.schres.2018.12.050
Updated: