Am I an Anarchist Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Organize a peaceful community intervention that directly addresses the problem and pressures decision-makers.
- Prepare the issue for the next election and support candidates offering a solution.
- Combine a public demonstration with formal complaints and policy negotiations.
- Keep working through agency meetings, expert reports, and administrative appeals.
- Put most available energy into helping the candidate win office.
- Support the campaign while continuing independent community organizing.
- Focus on lobbying the candidate and party for a detailed commitment.
- Build community power to pursue the goal regardless of who wins.
- Officials should decide after relying heavily on expert findings.
- Affected communities should decide, treating experts as advisers rather than rulers.
- Qualified experts should make the final decision within their field.
- The wider public should decide after experts present accessible evidence and options.
Am I an Anarchist Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
For readers examining their views on authority, collective decision-making, and political change, this anarchist quiz offers a structured profile. The Am I an Anarchist Quiz connects everyday choices about institutions and organizing with three related dimensions. It can show where your political preferences lean toward formal structures, accountable decentralization, direct action, or voluntary cooperation, without reducing them to one fixed label.
What This Assessment Measures
These questions concern preferences about authority, rules, shared needs, and change. Three dimensions organise the profile:
- Authority and Hierarchy Skepticism (0-15) measures doubt about concentrated power: Institutional Confidence (0-5) trusts formal authority; Conditional Skepticism (6-10) accepts accountable hierarchy; Anti-Hierarchical Affinity (11-15) favors decentralized authority.
- Direct and Prefigurative Change (0-15) measures strategic preference for acting outside conventional power channels while building horizontal, participatory relations in the present: Reform-First (0-5) favors institutions; Strategy Pluralist (6-10) combines routes; Direct-Change Affinity (11-15) favors direct action and alternatives.
- Voluntary Cooperation and Mutual Aid (0-15) measures preference for self-organized provision: Structured Provision (0-5) favors formal structures; Mixed Coordination (6-10) combines them with participation; Mutual-Aid Affinity (11-15) favors voluntary networks.
Together, bands show your position within each dimension, not a preference ranking. The result describes political themes and anarchist beliefs without assigning a definitive identity.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item presents a political situation with four response options. Options contrast formal authority with community control, reform with direct action, and managed provision with voluntary cooperation; some allow mixed positions. Direct action here does not imply violence. The format compares organizing and legitimacy preferences, not a complete political ideology.
Themes are conceptually consistent with the Anarchism questionnaire, especially its attention to authority, but this online questionnaire is not an adaptation of that instrument. Its prefigurative-change items distinguish reform from building horizontal relations through present organization, while the three scales keep authority, strategy, and cooperation separate.
Responses form the displayed profile, but the questionnaire does not state each option’s point value or provide population norms. The ranges summarize response patterns rather than validated clinical cutoffs, so they should not be reverse-engineered into a scoring rule. Self-report can shift with current context, interpretation, and self-awareness, so the bands indicate tendencies within each dimension rather than a fixed political identity. Read each range against its description: a high or low result reflects that scale’s stated preference, not a ranking across the profile.
- Dhont, K., Van Hiel, A., Pattyn, S., Onraet, E., & Severens, E. (2012). A Step into the Anarchist’s Mind: Examining Political Attitudes and Ideology through Event-Related Brain Potentials. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(3), 296-303. 10.1093/scan/nsr009
- Hammond, J. L. (2015). The Anarchism of Occupy Wall Street? Science & Society, 79(2), 288-313. 10.1521/siso.2015.79.2.288
- Saucier, G. (2013). Isms Dimensions: Toward a More Comprehensive and Integrative Model of Belief-System Components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 921-939. 10.1037/a0031968
- Presley, S. L. (1985). Moral Judgment and Attitudes toward Authority of Political Resisters. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 135-151. 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90024-8
Updated: