Is It Cheating Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- We discussed the circumstances and mutually revised or confirmed the boundary before I went.
- I went once for a practical reason and explained it openly soon afterward.
- I went more than once while leaving our disagreement unresolved.
- I kept arranging the outings despite knowing the boundary remained clear to my partner.
- I represented where I was, who was there, and the nature of the meeting accurately.
- I mentioned the meeting but did not volunteer every detail because it seemed personal.
- I described it in a way designed to make the connection seem less significant.
- I invented a different account of where I was or whom I was with.
- We clarified the change before either of us acted on it.
- I followed our past pattern while waiting for a suitable time to discuss it.
- I acted on my preferred interpretation even though the issue was unresolved.
- I treated the uncertainty as permission to do something I knew might breach our agreement.
Is It Cheating Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who feel uncertain about a partner’s boundary, a flirtatious exchange, or an outside attachment can use this relationship infidelity quiz to organize what happened and how it was understood. The Is It Cheating Quiz is intended for personal reflection, focusing on agreements, consent, attention, and honesty rather than imposing one universal definition. Its result shows which patterns deserve closer conversation.
What This Assessment Explores
Rather than treating infidelity as a single act, the questionnaire asks how conduct fitted understood limits. Its situations include physical intimacy, flirting, online exchanges, emotional reliance, future planning, shared-time attention, digital traces, and the honesty of explanations. The result therefore accommodates explicit or uncertain agreements.
The distinctions help clarify what you consider cheating while separating concerns about agreed limits, outside investment, and concealment.
The result presents these dimensions:
- Boundary Alignment (0-15) shows how closely conduct matched understood relationship limits: Generally aligned 0-5, Needs clarification 6-10, and Repeated conflict 11-15.
- Outside Intimacy and Investment (0-15) reflects romantic, emotional, or sexual attention directed outside the relationship: Limited outside investment 0-5, Growing outside focus 6-10, and Strong outside investment 11-15.
- Secrecy and Misrepresentation (0-15) examines concealment, omission, and misleading accounts: Mostly straightforward 0-5, Selective disclosure 6-10, and Active concealment 11-15.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each item describes a situation with four response options. Choices move from openly discussed or limited conduct toward boundary conflict, outside investment, selective disclosure, or concealment, capturing degrees of concern rather than a yes-or-no verdict.
The questionnaire presents separate scale bands for the three dimensions, with each band carrying its stated reflective meaning. The online questionnaire functions as a what do you consider cheating quiz, with descriptive, non-normed result bands and no established reliability information.
Conceptually, this infidelity questionnaire is closest to the Definitions of Infidelity Questionnaire (Thompson & O'Sullivan, 2016), which treats infidelity judgments as multidimensional. The online questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that instrument without being identified as an adaptation of it.
Thornton and Nagurney (2011) address differing interpretations, while Moller and Vossler (2015) explain why definitions vary across relationships and counseling contexts. These sources support the approach, not the questionnaire’s own norms or validation.
Self-report can be affected by memory, defensiveness, conflict, and limited self-awareness. Read the profile as a prompt to examine agreements, consent, privacy, and outside attention.
- Thompson, Ashley E., and Lucia F. O'Sullivan. "Drawing the Line: The Development of a Comprehensive Assessment of Infidelity Judgments." Journal of Sex Research 53, no. 8 (2016): 910-926. 10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840
- Thornton, Victoria, and Alexander Nagurney. "What is infidelity? Perceptions based on biological sex and personality." Psychology Research and Behavior Management 4 (2011): 51-58. 10.2147/PRBM.S16876
- Moller, Naomi P., and Andreas Vossler. "Defining Infidelity in Research and Couple Counseling: A Qualitative Study." Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 41, no. 5 (2015): 487-497. 10.1080/0092623X.2014.931314
Updated: