Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
relationships

Am I Boy Crazy Quiz

Am I Boy Crazy Quiz - Free Boy Crazy Test - FreudlyTake a free am i boy crazy quiz to explore whether you are boy crazy and understand what it means. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
In about 10 minutes, the Am I Boy Crazy Quiz uses 15 questions to explore how strongly thoughts about boys, romantic feelings, and dating interests shape your attention, mood, and priorities. Your result offers a reflective profile that can help you notice patterns and consider whether your romantic focus feels balanced.
Questions: 1510 minutes
Am I Boy Crazy: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
7,955 views
674 completions
645 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
645 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Crush PreoccupationCP
Measures how persistently thoughts about boys and crushes occupy your attention.
example score7/15
7/15Noticeable preoccupationexample score
0 – 5Light presence
6 – 10Noticeable preoccupation
11 – 15Strong preoccupation
A score of 7 suggests boys and crushes come to mind regularly and can sometimes interrupt your focus, but they are not necessarily dominating your attention.
Emotional StakesES
Measures how strongly attention, uncertainty, and imagined romantic possibilities involving boys influence your mood and self-view.
example score8/15
8/15Meaningful emotional stakesexample score
0 – 5Light emotional stakes
6 – 10Meaningful emotional stakes
11 – 15Strong emotional stakes
A score of 8 suggests meaningful emotional stakes, meaning responses from boys can noticeably lift, unsettle, or absorb you at times.
Priority PullPP
Measures how much pursuing or thinking about boys shifts your time, energy, money, and attention away from other priorities.
example score6/15
6/15Regular trade-offsexample score
0 – 5Limited pull
6 – 10Regular trade-offs
11 – 15Strong priority pull
A score of 6 suggests boys sometimes lead to noticeable trade-offs in your plans or routines, but they are not consistently displacing other priorities.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Frequent crush thinkers
41%OF USERS
They catch themselves daydreaming about boys a lot and want to know if it’s normal or getting distracting.
Mood tied to attention
34%OF USERS
Their confidence and emotions rise and fall based on romantic attention, texts, or flirting, and they want clarity on why.
Balancing goals and dating
25%OF USERS
They’re trying to keep school, friends, and hobbies on track while noticing that chasing boys sometimes takes over.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Crush PreoccupationCP
You?
Average8.6
Typical rangeTypical5.8 – 11.3
Possible0 – 15
Emotional StakesES
You?
Average8.2
Typical rangeTypical6.2 – 10.2
Possible0 – 15
Priority PullPP
You?
Average10.3
Typical rangeTypical8.1 – 12.5
Possible0 – 15
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • I wait until my work is done before joining the conversation
    • I send a short reply and return to the task
    • I chat longer than intended, then rush to finish
    • I keep chatting even if the task is late or I lose needed sleep
    • Keep the original plan without much internal conflict
    • Check whether another date with him would work instead
    • Try to rearrange the friend plan if everyone seems flexible
    • Cancel or substantially change the plan so I can see him
    • Mostly toward hobbies, plans, or whatever I am doing
    • Toward a mix of things, with an occasional thought about a boy
    • Often toward messages, crushes, or possible romantic situations
    • Almost automatically toward boys, dating, or romantic fantasies
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Am I Boy Crazy Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

relationships

People who notice that romantic interest can compete with concentration, mood, or other commitments may use the Am I Boy Crazy Quiz to examine those patterns in a structured way. This boy crazy quiz gives shape to experiences that feel exciting, distracting, or more consuming than expected. The intended reader is anyone seeking a balanced snapshot of how crushes affect everyday attention and choices.

What This Assessment Explores

The questionnaire examines how crushes affect attention, emotion, self-view, and priorities. Scenarios cover replies, imagined futures, spending, routines, friendships, and competing plans.

The result uses three dimensions:

  • Crush Preoccupation (0-15) measures persistent thoughts about boys and crushes occupying attention: Light presence (0-5) is occasional, Noticeable preoccupation (6-10) interrupts focus, and Strong preoccupation (11-15) often commands it.
  • Emotional Stakes (0-15) measures how attention, uncertainty, and imagined possibilities involving boys influence mood and self-view: Light emotional stakes (0-5) have limited influence; Meaningful emotional stakes (6-10) are noticeable; Strong emotional stakes (11-15) shape expectations.
  • Priority Pull (0-15) measures how pursuing or thinking about boys affects time, energy, money, and attention: Limited pull (0-5) fits priorities, Regular trade-offs (6-10) reshape plans, and Strong priority pull (11-15) displaces activities.

Together, these results separate mental presence, emotional weight, and practical trade-offs, helping you consider whether that focus feels chosen and manageable.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item presents a situation with four choices, moving from little impact or disruption toward stronger preoccupation, emotional impact, or displacement of priorities. Selecting the closest reaction makes the result a self-report of tendencies, not an observation of behavior.

The result displays three scale scores, creating a profile of romantic attention; higher bands indicate more of the tendency named by each scale. The questionnaire has descriptive bands rather than population norms or clinical cutoffs, so they show intensity without making a score good or bad.

The Relational Rumination Questionnaire is the closest comparison because it addresses persistent thought, uncertainty, and emotional investment around relationships. The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, but is not an adaptation or validation of it. The Love Addiction Inventory and Griffiths’s components model offer limited overlap around salience, mood effects, and interference; neither establishes addiction or validates this questionnaire.

Self-reported results can be influenced by current mood, recent romantic events, memory, and self-awareness. Read the profile in context: a high score may reflect a temporary crush, a recurring pattern, or a period when uncertainty carries unusual weight.

Literature:
  • Costa, Sebastiano, Nadia Barberis, Mark D. Griffiths, Loredana Benedetto, and Massimo Ingrassia (2021). The Love Addiction Inventory: Preliminary Findings of the Development Process and Psychometric Characteristics. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 19(3), 651-668. 10.1007/s11469-019-00097-y
  • Senkans, Svenja, Troy E. McEwan, Jason Skues, and James R. P. Ogloff (2016). Development of a Relational Rumination Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 27-35. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.032
  • Griffiths, Mark D. (2005). A 'components' model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191-197. 10.1080/14659890500114359

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment