Hen Do Quiz

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Petroleum jelly
- A water-based lubricant labeled as condom-compatible
- Body lotion containing oils
- Cooking oil
- Reduce the pace without interrupting the activity.
- Stop and check what they want before doing anything else.
- Change the angle without discussing it.
- Wait to see whether they mention the pain again.
- A contraceptive diaphragm
- A latex glove worn by the receiving partner
- A cervical cap
- A dental dam
Hen Do Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People planning a hen celebration may want a practical way to check whether conversations about sexual positions, consent and safer sex are grounded in accurate information. The Hen Do Quiz is intended for people who want a quick, non-judgmental knowledge check before discussing activities with friends or partners. Used as a hen night quiz, these prompts can turn common party-topic questions into clearer, safer conversations.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions examine practical sexual knowledge, not personality or compatibility. They cover position terms, STI and pregnancy risk, barriers, consent, comfort, toy hygiene and safety concerns. Together, these topics feed one educational knowledge scale; the total reflects recognition of the position terms and safer-sex principles represented by the items.
The topics include:
- Position terminology tests recognition of common arrangements and partner control.
- Safer-sex knowledge covers barriers, lubricant choices, STI exposure and pregnancy facts.
- Consent and communication concern freely given agreement and responses to discomfort.
- Comfort and risk awareness include pain, fatigue, balance, hygiene and hidden-injury risks.
For someone organizing a hen event, this hen party quiz can prompt a calm conversation before games, jokes or advice are shared. It does not rank sexual experience; a lower result may indicate unfamiliar terms or gaps in education.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The format is a self-administered, four-option multiple-choice knowledge questionnaire. Items present scenarios with one best answer or test definitions and distinctions involving dental dams, condom-compatible lubricant and position terms. One educational scale reports the result, but answer weights are not stated, so its bands cannot be reverse-engineered into a scoring rule.
Content is conceptually consistent with SKAS-PC (Sadat et al., 2018) and Jaworski and Carey’s STI knowledge measure. Consent items align with Jozkowski et al. (2014), while De Boos (2019) supports the strangulation-injury warning. These sources support the topics; this questionnaire is not an adaptation of those instruments.
The displayed scale, Hen Do Sexual Position Knowledge (0-16), has three bands: Foundations to build (0-6), Developing knowledge (7-12) and Strong knowledge (13-16).
The scoring for this online questionnaire is not independently standardized or normed, so its bands are educational result bands, not population cutoffs. Answers can reflect education, attention, wording interpretation and assumptions. These hen do questions help check assumptions, not provide a medical, legal, compatibility or diagnostic judgment; pain, pressure, intoxication or uncertainty matter regardless of total.
- Sadat Z, Ghofranipour F, Azin SA, Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Bagheri A, Barati E. Development and psychometric evaluation of the sexual knowledge and attitudes scale for premarital couples (SKAS-PC): An exploratory mixed method study. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine. 2018;16(1):41-50. 10.29252/ijrm.16.1.41
- Jaworski BC, Carey MP. Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire to measure knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases. AIDS and Behavior. 2007;11(4):557-574. 10.1007/s10461-006-9168-5
- Jozkowski KN, Sanders SA, Peterson ZD, Dennis B, Reece M. Consenting to sexual activity: the development and psychometric assessment of dual measures of consent. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2014;43(3):437-450. 10.1007/s10508-013-0225-7
- De Boos J. Review article: Non-fatal strangulation: Hidden injuries, hidden risks. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 2019;31(3):302-308. 10.1111/1742-6723.13243
Updated: