Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
addiction

Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test

Take the online Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
In about 3 minutes, the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test presents 16 statements about decision-making, boundaries, self-care, and relationship patterns. Your result indicates the degree to which you may prioritize others’ needs or overlook your own, helping you reflect on personal tendencies with greater clarity.
Questions: 163 minutes
Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
35,614 views
4,306 completions
3,432 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
3,432 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

CodependencyC
Assesses the degree of codependent tendencies, including overinvolvement in others’ problems and neglect of one’s own needs.
example score49/96
49/96Moderateexample score
16 – 32Low
33 – 60Moderate
61 – 96High
A score of 49 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting some codependency-related patterns may be present but not strongly pronounced.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

People in draining relationships
41%OF USERS
They feel responsible for a partner’s moods or problems, struggle to set boundaries, and want clarity on whether this is codependency.
Adult children of dysfunction
34%OF USERS
They grew up with addiction, conflict, or emotional neglect and want to see how family patterns still shape their choices and self-worth.
Therapy and support group clients
25%OF USERS
They need a quick self-check to track progress and focus therapy goals around needs, boundaries, and over-responsibility.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Codependency ScaleCS
You?
Average69.1
Typical rangeTypical58 – 80.2
Possible16 – 96
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Moderately disagree
    • Slightly disagree
    • Slightly agree
    • Moderately agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

addiction
codependency

People examining over-responsibility, self-neglect, or painful relationship dynamics may use the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test to examine responses to other people's needs, boundaries, conflict, and emotional discomfort. The result from this questionnaire organizes codependency patterns involving difficulty expressing needs, self-sacrifice, and the tendency to let another person's problems displace personal needs and responsibilities across close relationships.

What This Assessment Measures

The questionnaire explores codependent tendencies in everyday decisions and relationships. It suits people considering whether helping, avoiding conflict, or focusing on another person is displacing their own needs and responsibilities.

In context, the result functions as a codependency assessment describing involvement, self-sacrifice, and emotional management. Higher scores indicate greater alignment with excessive concern for others' problems and neglect of personal needs; moderate scores may reflect traits below clinically significant severity.

The result and its themes can be read through these points:

  • Codependency: 16-96. The result is Low 16-32, Moderate 33-60, or High 61-96.
  • Boundaries and decisions show whether saying no, choosing independently, or letting others manage problems feels difficult.
  • Self-care and self-worth indicate how guilt, praise, and postponed personal needs may shape behavior.
  • Relationship focus and emotional expression capture overinvolvement, conflict avoidance, hidden hurt, fear, and sudden release.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses six ordered options, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, and addresses decisions, saying no, self-care, prioritizing others, relationship pain, worry, conflict, and emotional expression. Respondents select the option that best matches their experience.

The online questionnaire reports one overall score that combines themes involving boundaries, worry, emotional expression, and relationship quality. The displayed bands function as within-questionnaire levels; population comparison requires explicitly provided norms.

Its closest conceptual reference is the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale (Fischer et al., 1991). This online questionnaire is an adaptation of that instrument and is conceptually consistent with the published work, but validation of the published instrument does not automatically validate this version. Lindley et al. (1999) is relevant for discussing predictor and psychometric questions, not for validating this specific version.

Interpretation of the codependency questionnaire is strongest when the score is compared with repeated relationship patterns and the context of responding. Self-report can shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose, so one result cannot establish a clinical condition. Read it as a prompt to examine boundaries, reciprocity, and self-care.

Author: Timmen L. Cermak
Literature:
  • Fischer, J. L., Spann, L., & Crawford, D. (1991). Measuring codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 8(1), 87-100. 10.1300/J020V08N01_06
  • Lindley, N. R., Giordano, P. J., & Hammer, E. D. (1999). Codependency: Predictors and psychometric issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 59-64. 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4679%28199901%2955%3A1%3C59%3A%3AAID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment