Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Moderately disagree
- Slightly disagree
- Slightly agree
- Moderately agree
- Strongly agree
Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People examining over-responsibility, self-neglect, or painful relationship dynamics may use the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale Test to examine responses to other people's needs, boundaries, conflict, and emotional discomfort. The result from this questionnaire organizes codependency patterns involving difficulty expressing needs, self-sacrifice, and the tendency to let another person's problems displace personal needs and responsibilities across close relationships.
What This Assessment Measures
The questionnaire explores codependent tendencies in everyday decisions and relationships. It suits people considering whether helping, avoiding conflict, or focusing on another person is displacing their own needs and responsibilities.
In context, the result functions as a codependency assessment describing involvement, self-sacrifice, and emotional management. Higher scores indicate greater alignment with excessive concern for others' problems and neglect of personal needs; moderate scores may reflect traits below clinically significant severity.
The result and its themes can be read through these points:
- Codependency: 16-96. The result is Low 16-32, Moderate 33-60, or High 61-96.
- Boundaries and decisions show whether saying no, choosing independently, or letting others manage problems feels difficult.
- Self-care and self-worth indicate how guilt, praise, and postponed personal needs may shape behavior.
- Relationship focus and emotional expression capture overinvolvement, conflict avoidance, hidden hurt, fear, and sudden release.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each statement uses six ordered options, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, and addresses decisions, saying no, self-care, prioritizing others, relationship pain, worry, conflict, and emotional expression. Respondents select the option that best matches their experience.
The online questionnaire reports one overall score that combines themes involving boundaries, worry, emotional expression, and relationship quality. The displayed bands function as within-questionnaire levels; population comparison requires explicitly provided norms.
Its closest conceptual reference is the Spann-Fischer Codependency Scale (Fischer et al., 1991). This online questionnaire is an adaptation of that instrument and is conceptually consistent with the published work, but validation of the published instrument does not automatically validate this version. Lindley et al. (1999) is relevant for discussing predictor and psychometric questions, not for validating this specific version.
Interpretation of the codependency questionnaire is strongest when the score is compared with repeated relationship patterns and the context of responding. Self-report can shift with current stress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose, so one result cannot establish a clinical condition. Read it as a prompt to examine boundaries, reciprocity, and self-care.
- Fischer, J. L., Spann, L., & Crawford, D. (1991). Measuring codependency. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 8(1), 87-100. 10.1300/J020V08N01_06
- Lindley, N. R., Giordano, P. J., & Hammer, E. D. (1999). Codependency: Predictors and psychometric issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 59-64. 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4679%28199901%2955%3A1%3C59%3A%3AAID-JCLP5%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M
Updated: