Love Percentage Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- I usually process it alone or tell someone else first.
- I might mention it later if it comes up naturally.
- I often want to share it with them fairly soon.
- They are usually the first person I want to tell.
- I usually imagine that future without assigning them a role.
- They might be present, but the image is indistinct.
- I often picture them as a continuing part of my life.
- Including them feels central to how I imagine that future.
- Very little; I prefer to keep that part of myself separate.
- Selected pieces, once I have had time to整理 them privately.
- Quite a lot, while still keeping a few areas to myself.
- I strongly want to be known by them as my full, imperfect self.
Love Percentage Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People wondering how deeply they feel connected to someone can use the love percentage quiz as a structured moment of reflection. An emotional connection assessment can help clarify which parts of your personal experience feel stronger, guarded, or uncertain. The profile gives you a focused way to consider your own pattern and decide which experiences merit further reflection.
What This Assessment Explores
The questions address emotional importance, openness, trust, and including someone in future plans. Independence, delayed replies, support, disagreement, vulnerability, shared time, and sustained effort become choices about usual responses. This relationship reflection tool suits people considering a significant, emotionally close, or future-oriented connection, whether established, developing, or uncertain.
The three result dimensions are:
- Emotional Closeness (0-15) shows felt importance: Emerging or guarded (0-5) reflects developing or protected closeness; Meaningful connection (6-10) reflects variable engagement; Deeply connected (11-15) marks a strong emotional place.
- Shared-Future Investment (0-15) shows future orientation: Present-focused (0-5) stays with now; Exploring continuity (6-10) allows possible continuation; Future-invested (11-15) reflects desire to build together, not certainty.
- Trust and Openness (0-15) shows expected care and authenticity: Cautious access (0-5) retains privacy; Growing trust (6-10) is situational; Strong trust (11-15) supports openness with boundaries.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each prompt presents a relationship situation with four ordered options, moving from less involvement or uncertainty toward more openness, security, or investment. You choose the response closest to your usual experience, so self-report, mood, memory, circumstances, and candor can shape the result.
Each dimension receives a score. Every 0-15 score can also be expressed as a percentage using score ÷ 15 × 100. Read the three scales through their own result bands, describing a tendency as more developed, guarded, or uncertain. Interpret the result in light of your responses and answering context.
Conceptually, this questionnaire can be compared with the Quadrangular Love Scale (Karandashev & Evans, 2019), the Investment Model Scale (Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998), and Rempel, Holmes, and Zanna’s 1985 work on trust in close relationships. These published instruments are conceptual comparators; they do not validate or norm this online questionnaire, which is neither a direct administration nor a validated adaptation.
As an online self-reflection questionnaire, it is not standardized; results depend on self-awareness and context and do not establish mutual feelings, compatibility, or future outcomes.
- Karandashev, V., & Evans, N. D. (2019). Quadrangular Love Theory and Scale: Validation and Psychometric Investigation. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 10(1), 1-35. 10.2458/v10i1.23520
- Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-387. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
- Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985). Trust in Close Relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112. 10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
Updated: