Am I Stubborn Quiz
How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Accept the result and note that more than one method can work.
- Accept it while asking about the reasoning behind their method.
- Request a few changes so the process aligns more closely with how I would do it.
- Ask for it to be redone using my method because consistency of approach matters to me.
- As a tentative view that may change as more becomes known.
- As my best current conclusion, with a few reservations.
- As a position worth defending until someone clearly disproves it.
- As a firm conclusion because choosing a side matters more than remaining uncertain.
- Look for a split, rotation, or third option that respects both preferences.
- Offer one concession if they are willing to make one too.
- Argue strongly for my arrangement and compromise only if the conflict continues.
- Refuse changes because giving way would establish the wrong precedent.
Am I Stubborn Quiz - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand whether persistence is helping or narrowing their choices can use the Am I Stubborn Quiz as a focused self-reflection exercise. The useful question behind an are you stubborn quiz is whether firmness is good or bad, but where it helps or limits a response. The result separates several forms of firmness, so one elevated area does not define your whole personality.
What This Assessment Explores
This assessment explores how stubborn you may be in three settings where firmness can appear: changing plans, negotiating with someone, and revising a belief. This approach makes the how stubborn are you quiz more specific than a global label, showing whether persistence is mainly practical, interpersonal, or connected with confidence in one's interpretation.
The displayed bands describe those dimensions this way:
- Behavioral Adaptability (0-15) measures responses to changing plans: 0-5 Responsive Adapter usually changes course; 6-10 Steady Planner adjusts selectively; 11-15 Course Keeper preserves the established route.
- Interpersonal Give-and-Take (0-15) measures firmness in shared decisions: 0-5 Collaborative Stance makes room for both views; 6-10 Firm Negotiator compromises selectively; 11-15 Position Defender prioritizes holding ground.
- Viewpoint Flexibility (0-15) measures responses to evidence: 0-5 Open Reviser updates readily; 6-10 Selectively Firm reconsiders with effort; 11-15 Strongly Fixed resists credible challenges.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Each prompt presents an everyday situation and four ordered choices, moving from an adaptable or revisable reaction toward a firmer, more resistant one. Responses are grouped by theme rather than treated as one verdict, so this stubbornness quiz yields distinct tendencies. The questionnaire shows dimension scores and bands, but does not specify each option's point contribution, so the ranges are descriptive rather than clinical cutoffs.
Published lines of work offer conceptual comparison points for the questionnaire's focus on stubbornness, including Oreg's Resistance to Change Scale, Martin and Rubin's work on cognitive flexibility, Paulhus and Martin's research on functional flexibility, and Meyer, Alfano, and de Bruin's discussions of epistemic flexibility. These sources clarify related constructs but do not provide psychometric evidence for this online questionnaire or establish its reliability, validity, or norms.
For this online version, norms, reliability estimates, and clinical cutoffs are not specified; self-report results can also shift with context, social desirability, and self-awareness. Use the profile to examine recurring choices and consequences: persistence may protect a goal, while changing course may reflect sound judgment rather than inconsistency.
- Oreg, Shaul. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
- Martin, Matthew M., and Rubin, Rebecca B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 623-626. 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623
- Paulhus, Delroy L., and Martin, Carol Lynn. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conception of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 88-101. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.88
- Meyer, Marco, Alfano, Mark, and de Bruin, Boudewijn. (2024). The Development and Validation of the Epistemic Vice Scale. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 15, 355-382. 10.1007/s13164-021-00562-5
Updated: