Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
identity

Diversity Quiz

Diversity Quiz - Free Sexual Orientation Test - FreudlyTake a free diversity quiz to explore your diversity knowledge and discover your results. Quick, no sign-up needed. Start now!en
Designed for anyone who wants to strengthen inclusive understanding, the diversity quiz contains 16 questions and takes about 10 minutes. Its result highlights knowledge of sexual-orientation diversity, from core concepts to respectful communication, offering a practical prompt for learning, reflection, and more confident support of others.
Questions: 1610 minutes
Diversity Quiz: situation and reply bubbles
July 22, 2026July 22, 2026Material has been updatedJuly 22, 2026Material has been published
8,342 views
745 completions
655 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
655 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Sexual Orientation Diversity KnowledgeSODK
Measures how many sexual-orientation diversity knowledge items you answered correctly, including concepts, inclusive language, and respectful support.
example score6/16
6/16Foundations to buildexample score
0 – 6Foundations to build
7 – 12Developing understanding
13 – 16Strong understanding
A score of 6 falls in the Foundations to build range, suggesting some core distinctions or inclusive practices may be unfamiliar and offering clear areas for continued learning.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Allies and curious learners
41%OF USERS
People who want to understand sexual orientation diversity better and make sure their language and assumptions are respectful.
Students and educators
34%OF USERS
Learners and teachers using the quiz to check understanding of key terms, identity concepts, and real-life situations for discussion or coursework.
Supportive friends and family
25%OF USERS
People with LGBTQ+ loved ones who want practical guidance on how to be supportive, avoid common mistakes, and respond thoughtfully.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Sexual Orientation Diversity KnowledgeSODK
You?
Average8.1
Typical rangeTypical6.1 – 10.1
Possible0 – 16
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • They have decided that orientation labels are inaccurate for everyone
    • They are exploring or unsure how they understand and describe their orientation
    • They are asking other people to choose a label for them
    • They are necessarily moving from one specific orientation to another
    • Offer relevant options, allow self-description or multiple selections where appropriate, and include “prefer not to answer”
    • Require every respondent to choose one label from a short fixed list
    • Require an open-text explanation from every respondent
    • Infer orientation from the gender of a respondent’s current partner
    • Employees may bring a partner or guest
    • Employees may bring an opposite-sex companion
    • Employees may bring a spouse, if legally married
    • Employees may bring a close friend rather than a partner
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Diversity Quiz - Description and methodology of the test

identity

Anyone who wants to build a more accurate and respectful understanding of sexual-orientation diversity can use this diversity quiz as a focused learning check. It suits learners, educators, and curious adults who want to examine terminology, inclusive communication, and everyday assumptions. In educational settings, it can highlight concepts that merit discussion, while the result identifies areas for further learning.

What This Assessment Explores

The questions examine practical sexual-orientation knowledge rather than personal disclosure. They cover orientation labels, questioning, asexuality, bisexuality, fluidity, romantic attraction, and distinctions between sexual orientation and gender. Scenarios apply these ideas to privacy, inclusive language, disclosure, stereotypes, and everyday assumptions. Together, these items test whether respondents can recognize accurate concepts and apply respectful practices.

The result is reported on Sexual Orientation Diversity Knowledge (0-16), a correct-answer score. It describes educational understanding, not a person’s orientation, identity, values, or capacity to support others.

The bands translate that score into three learning descriptions:

  • Foundations to build (0-6) indicates that core distinctions or inclusive practices may still be unfamiliar.
  • Developing understanding (7-12) shows recognition of many concepts, although applied nuance may be missed.
  • Strong understanding (13-16) reflects broad, practical knowledge of sexual-orientation diversity.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each item presents a short definition or situation with four answer choices. This self-administered multiple-choice format asks the respondent to select the option that best matches accurate, inclusive knowledge, so it tests recognition and application rather than personal orientation.

The items move from terminology to practical judgment: respondents distinguish concepts, choose inclusive survey wording, protect privacy, and respond constructively to stereotypes in ordinary social and workplace situations. Identity disclosure is not required.

Its main conceptual reference point is LGB-KASH (Worthington et al., 2005), a published measure of knowledge and attitudes about lesbian, gay, and bisexual topics. This questionnaire is conceptually consistent with that work, not an adaptation of it. National Academies (2022) also recommends clear, voluntary self-description options when collecting sexual-orientation information.

The questionnaire functions as a diversity test in quiz form: the total is the number of correct answers, interpreted through the displayed learning bands. Prior exposure, attention, wording interpretation, and current perspective can affect performance, so reviewing missed concepts and their underlying distinctions can help identify learning priorities and guide further discussion.

Literature:
  • Worthington, Roger L., Frank R. Dillon, and Ann M. Becker-Schutte. 2005. Development, Reliability, and Validity of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale for Heterosexuals (LGB-KASH). Journal of Counseling Psychology 52(1): 104-118. 10.1037/0022-0167.52.1.104
  • Harris, Mary B., Jane Nightengale, and Nancy Owen. 1995. Health Care Professionals' Experience, Knowledge, and Attitudes Concerning Homosexuality. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services 2(2): 91-108. 10.1300/J041v02n02_06
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 10.17226/26424

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment