Home1
Psychological tests2
Problematic Social Media Use Scale3

Problematic Social Media Use Scale Test

Designed for a focused look at social media habits, the Problematic Social Media Use Scale Test contains 15 questions and takes about 3 minutes. Its result highlights compulsive checking, mental preoccupation, emotional coping, preference for online communication, and everyday consequences, supporting reflection on how social media affects routines and relationships.

Questions: 153 minutes

Problematic Social Media Use Scale: agreement scale card

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published

20,147 views

1,798 completions

1,452 likes

Daniel Hall Psychologist · Test reviewer

1,452 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Negative ConsequencesNC

Measures how strongly social media use is associated with negative impacts on daily functioning, such as strained relationships or reduced productivity.

example score10/21

10/21Moderate impactexample score

3 – 8Low impact

9 – 14Moderate impact

15 – 21High impact

A score of 10 falls in the Moderate impact range, suggesting occasional noticeable drawbacks from social media use in areas like productivity or interpersonal interactions.

Compulsive UseCU

Measures the degree of repetitive, hard-to-control social media use and preoccupation with checking it.

example score8/21

8/21Lowexample score

3 – 8Low

9 – 14Moderate

15 – 21High

A score of 8 falls in the Low range, suggesting compulsive social media behaviors are minimal or occur infrequently.

Cognitive PreoccupationCP

Measures how strongly a person becomes mentally preoccupied with social media and how hard it is to shift attention away from it.

example score9/21

9/21Moderate absorptionexample score

3 – 8Low absorption

9 – 14Moderate absorption

15 – 21High absorption

A score of 9 indicates a moderate level of cognitive absorption, suggesting occasional persistent thoughts about social media and some difficulty redirecting attention.

Emotion RegulationER

Measures the extent to which a person uses social media to manage, soothe, or change their emotional state.

example score11/21

11/21Moderateexample score

3 – 8Low

9 – 14Moderate

15 – 21High

A score of 11 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting occasional reliance on social media to regulate emotions without consistently dominating coping efforts.

Preference for Online CommunicationPfOC

Measures how strongly a person tends to prefer online communication over face-to-face interaction.

example score14/21

14/21Moderate preferenceexample score

3 – 8Low preference

9 – 15Moderate preference

16 – 21High preference

A score of 14 falls in the Moderate preference range, suggesting a noticeable but not dominant tendency to choose online communication over in-person contact.

Problematic Social Media Use ScalePSMUS

Assesses the degree to which social media use is excessive and associated with difficulties or negative impacts in daily life.

example score35/105

35/105Lowexample score

15 – 44Low

45 – 74Moderate

75 – 105High

A score of 35 falls in the Low range, suggesting generally controlled social media use with minimal signs of related difficulties.

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Heavy daily scrollers

41%OF USERS

People who notice they spend more time online than planned and feel it affects mood, focus, or sleep.

Mood regulation seekers

33%OF USERS

Those who turn to feeds and notifications to cope with stress, loneliness, or boredom and worry it’s becoming a habit.

Helping professionals and coaches

26%OF USERS

Psychologists, counselors, and coaches who need a quick screening to understand how online behavior impacts a client’s daily life.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Shaded area — where most people score

Dot — the average

You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test

Negative ConsequencesNC

You?

Average9.1

Typical rangeTypical5.9 – 12.2

Possible3 – 21

Compulsive useCu

You?

Average13.7

Typical rangeTypical10.4 – 17

Possible3 – 21

Cognitive AbsorptionCA

You?

Average14.6

Typical rangeTypical11.8 – 17.3

Possible3 – 21

Emotion RegulationER

You?

Average12.3

Typical rangeTypical9.5 – 15.2

Possible3 – 21

Preference for online communicationPfoc

You?

Average11.2

Typical rangeTypical8.3 – 14

Possible3 – 21

Problematic Social Media Use ScalePSMUS

You?

Average82.1

Typical rangeTypical70.2 – 94

Possible15 – 105

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neutral
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neutral
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Somewhat disagree
- Neutral
- Somewhat agree
- Agree
- Strongly agree

These are 3 of the 15 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Problematic Social Media Use Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

cyberpsychology

social networks

People who want to understand their overall involvement with social media can use this social media engagement assessment to examine possible difficulties through structured self-reflection. The Problematic Social Media Use Scale Test organizes reported experiences into several dimensions rather than reducing them to time spent online. Its assessment profile helps respondents notice preoccupation, control difficulties, emotional coping, preference for online contact, and the overall shape of their engagement.

What This Assessment Explores

Items cover face-to-face contact, emotional coping, checking thoughts, time control, and problems. This social media use questionnaire examines habits without clinical interpretation.

The result contains these dimensions:

Negative Consequences (3-21) reflects impact on relationships, productivity, and daily life: Low impact (3-8), Moderate impact (9-14), High impact (15-21).
Compulsive Use (3-21) reflects control difficulty: Low (3-8), Moderate (9-14), High (15-21).
Cognitive Preoccupation (3-21) reflects absorption: Low absorption (3-8), Moderate absorption (9-14), High absorption (15-21).
Emotion Regulation (3-21) reflects emotional coping: Low (3-8), Moderate (9-14), High (15-21).
Preference for Online Communication (3-21) reflects online preference: Low preference (3-8), Moderate preference (9-15), High preference (16-21).
Problematic Social Media Use (15-105) reflects engagement difficulties: Low (15-44), Moderate (45-74), High (75-105).

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each statement uses a seven-point agreement scale with graded choices from disagreement to agreement. Items cover behavior, thoughts, emotional motives, and consequences, so interpretation rests on the response pattern rather than one answer. Separate dimensions and an overall result are displayed; higher values indicate more of the tendency defined by the relevant scale, while the displayed bands are descriptive ranges rather than universal clinical cutoffs.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Problematic Facebook Use Scale (Marino et al., 2017), a factorial reference for problematic social-media involvement, but it is not an adaptation of that instrument. Sirota et al. (2018) offers a related social-network measure; Caplan's model links online social preference with deficient self-regulation, and Young's framework describes loss of control and life interference in problematic internet use.

This online social media questionnaire is a self-report tool with descriptive bands, and it does not provide population norms or clinical standardization. Its questions connect engagement with checking urges, mental involvement, emotional coping, communication preference, and possible consequences. Scores can vary with honesty, self-awareness, and current circumstances, so they describe present tendencies.

Author: Kimberly S. Young, Mark D. Griffiths

Literature:

Marino, C., Vieno, A., Altoe, G., & Spada, M. M. (2017). Factorial validity of the Problematic Facebook Use Scale for adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 6(1), 5-10. 10.1556/2006.6.2017.004
Sirota, N. A., Moskovchenko, D. V., Yaltonsky, V. M., & Yaltonskaya, A. V. (2018). Development of the Russian Version of the Questionnaire for the Problematic Use of Social Networks. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 26(3), 33-55. 10.17759/cpp.2018260303
Caplan, S. E. (2010). Theory and measurement of generalized problematic Internet use: A two-step approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1089-1097. 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.012
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237-244. 10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237

Updated: 2025-10-02