Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
psychopathology

Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test

Take the online Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 26 questions, the Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test takes about five minutes and explores the reasons people may report for self-injurious behavior, including emotional relief, self-control, novelty, and interpersonal effects. Results can support personal reflection and help you better understand the motives represented in your profile.
Questions: 265 minutes
Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test: agreement scale card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
19,912 views
1,941 completion
1,615 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,615 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Interpersonal ControlIC
Measures the extent to which self-injury is used to influence interpersonal situations or regain a sense of control in relationships.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2.3Low
2.4 – 3.6Moderate
3.7 – 5High
A score of 3 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting self-injury may sometimes function as a way to affect others or manage interpersonal control, but it is not the predominant motive.
Self-Change and Novel Experience SeekingSCaNES
Measures the extent to which self-harming behavior is used to change oneself or seek new sensations and emotional states.
example score3/5
3/5Moderate drive for change/noveltyexample score
1 – 2Low drive for change/novelty
3Moderate drive for change/novelty
4 – 5High drive for change/novelty
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-harming behavior as a way to shift internal state or seek new experiences, alongside other possible motives.
Tension ReliefTR
Measures the extent to which self-injurious behavior is used to reduce internal stress, anxiety, or emotional tension.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2Low
3Moderate
4 – 5High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-injurious behavior as one of the ways to manage or relieve internal tension.
Influencing OthersIO
Measures the extent to which self-injurious behavior is used to influence or affect other people.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2Low
3Moderate
4 – 5High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency for self-injurious behavior to serve, at times, as a way to influence others or gain attention.
Regaining Control Over EmotionsRCOE
Measures the extent to which self-injury is used as a strategy to regain control over overwhelming emotions.
example score3/5
3/5Moderateexample score
1 – 2Low
3Moderate
4 – 5High
A score of 3 suggests a moderate tendency to use self-injury to manage emotions and restore a sense of control.
Self-ControlSC
Measures the extent to which self-harm is used to regain self-control through emotional regulation and tension relief.
example score4/5
4/5Highexample score
1 – 2Low
3Moderate
4 – 5High
A score of 4 indicates a high tendency to use self-harm as a strategy to restore self-control by reducing emotional intensity and tension.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Clients in therapy for self-harm
44%OF USERS
People already experiencing self-injury take it to clarify what needs the behavior is serving, like reducing distress or regaining control.
Psychologists and psychotherapists
36%OF USERS
Clinicians use it to structure assessment and discuss functions of self-injury to guide treatment planning.
Clinical trainees and interns
20%OF USERS
Students and early-career practitioners take it to learn how different motives for self-injury can be identified and documented.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Interpersonal ControlIC
You?
Average3.4
Typical rangeTypical2.9 – 4
Possible1 – 5
Changing Yourself, Seeking New ExperiencesCYSNE
You?
Average2.8
Typical rangeTypical2.1 – 3.5
Possible1 – 5
Relieving TensionRT
You?
Average3.9
Typical rangeTypical3.3 – 4.5
Possible1 – 5
Influencing OthersIO
You?
Average3.8
Typical rangeTypical3.2 – 4.3
Possible1 – 5
Regaining control over your emotionsRcoye
You?
Average2.2
Typical rangeTypical1.6 – 2.7
Possible1 – 5
Self-controlS
You?
Average3.4
Typical rangeTypical2.6 – 4.1
Possible1 – 5
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

In some situations, a person may intentionally harm their own body—for example, by cutting, burning, or hitting themselves with full force. Sometimes this occurs less overtly, in the form of so-called bad habits, such as biting one’s nails or lips, or scratching the skin. These and other forms of self-injury occur for different reasons. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the reasons that may explain why you have engaged in self-injury.
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
    • Strongly disagree
    • Disagree
    • Not sure
    • Agree
    • Strongly agree
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

psychopathology
self-harm

People examining their own experiences may use this questionnaire to consider why self-injurious behavior occurs in particular emotional or interpersonal contexts. The Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test organizes reported motives without treating any single explanation as definitive. As a self-injury motives questionnaire, it can help a respondent notice patterns involving relief, control, novelty, and communication.

What This Assessment Explores

Items examine motives and situations linked to self-injurious behavior. The result shows which themes are prominent in a respondent's profile. In this self-injurious behavior motives test, the dimensions are:

  • Interpersonal Control (1-5) reflects motives to influence others and seek novel experiences, including using self-injury to affect interpersonal relationships; Low 1-2.3, Moderate 2.4-3.6, High 3.7-5.
  • Self-Change and Novel Experience Seeking (1-5) reflects changing oneself or seeking sensations; Low drive for change/novelty 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
  • Tension Relief (1-5) reflects reducing inner tension; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
  • Influencing Others (1-5) reflects affecting other people; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
  • Regaining Control Over Emotions (1-5) reflects restoring emotional control; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
  • Self-Control (1-5) combines emotion regulation and tension relief; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each item in this self-injurious behavior questionnaire presents a possible motive, feeling, or situation. The respondent selects one of five ordered responses, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with Not sure or Unsure as the middle option. This format records degree of endorsement; the online result reports separate motive scores rather than a single severity score.

The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Scale of Reasons for Self-Injurious Behavior, but it is not presented as a direct adaptation or standardized reproduction. The ISAS is a related published method that describes functions such as emotion regulation and communication; it is not this questionnaire's source instrument.

Interpret the bands as descriptive groupings of endorsed motives, not as population norms or diagnostic cutoffs. The result is shaped by memory, current distress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose, so personal context and broader assessment remain important when considering what the profile means.

Author: E. David Klonsky, Matthew K. Nock
Literature:
  • Polskaya, Natalia A. (2014). Causes of Self-Injury in Adolescence (Based on a Self-Report Scale). Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 22(2), 140-152.
  • Polskaya, Natalia A. (2015). Self-Injurious Acts in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorders. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 8(3), 129-144. 10.17759/exppsy.2015080312
  • Nock, Matthew K. (2010). Self-Injury. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 339-363. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131258
  • Klonsky, E. David, and Glenn, Catherine R. (2009). Assessing the Functions of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(3), 215-219. 10.1007/s10862-008-9107-z

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment