Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Not sure
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
People examining their own experiences may use this questionnaire to consider why self-injurious behavior occurs in particular emotional or interpersonal contexts. The Self-Injurious Behavior Motives Scale Test organizes reported motives without treating any single explanation as definitive. As a self-injury motives questionnaire, it can help a respondent notice patterns involving relief, control, novelty, and communication.
What This Assessment Explores
Items examine motives and situations linked to self-injurious behavior. The result shows which themes are prominent in a respondent's profile. In this self-injurious behavior motives test, the dimensions are:
- Interpersonal Control (1-5) reflects motives to influence others and seek novel experiences, including using self-injury to affect interpersonal relationships; Low 1-2.3, Moderate 2.4-3.6, High 3.7-5.
- Self-Change and Novel Experience Seeking (1-5) reflects changing oneself or seeking sensations; Low drive for change/novelty 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
- Tension Relief (1-5) reflects reducing inner tension; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
- Influencing Others (1-5) reflects affecting other people; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
- Regaining Control Over Emotions (1-5) reflects restoring emotional control; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
- Self-Control (1-5) combines emotion regulation and tension relief; Low 1-2, Moderate 3, High 4-5.
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Each item in this self-injurious behavior questionnaire presents a possible motive, feeling, or situation. The respondent selects one of five ordered responses, from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree, with Not sure or Unsure as the middle option. This format records degree of endorsement; the online result reports separate motive scores rather than a single severity score.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the Scale of Reasons for Self-Injurious Behavior, but it is not presented as a direct adaptation or standardized reproduction. The ISAS is a related published method that describes functions such as emotion regulation and communication; it is not this questionnaire's source instrument.
Interpret the bands as descriptive groupings of endorsed motives, not as population norms or diagnostic cutoffs. The result is shaped by memory, current distress, self-awareness, and willingness to disclose, so personal context and broader assessment remain important when considering what the profile means.
- Polskaya, Natalia A. (2014). Causes of Self-Injury in Adolescence (Based on a Self-Report Scale). Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 22(2), 140-152.
- Polskaya, Natalia A. (2015). Self-Injurious Acts in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorders. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 8(3), 129-144. 10.17759/exppsy.2015080312
- Nock, Matthew K. (2010). Self-Injury. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 339-363. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131258
- Klonsky, E. David, and Glenn, Catherine R. (2009). Assessing the Functions of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Psychometric Properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-Injury (ISAS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 31(3), 215-219. 10.1007/s10862-008-9107-z
Updated: