Retirement Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
- Strongly disagree
- Disagree
- Neither agree nor disagree
- Agree
- Strongly agree
Retirement Test - Description and methodology of the test
People considering how money, health, time and social roles may change after work will find this retirement planning assessment useful for organizing those questions. The retirement quiz is intended for self-reflection before or during retirement planning, especially when priorities feel vague or preparation has been postponed. It helps you consider whether you are ready to retire by showing which parts of the transition have been considered and which remain unsettled.
What This Assessment Explores
These items form a retirement readiness test for people who want to see which parts of the transition need attention. Themes include money, health, leisure, community involvement and future roles, linking practical preparation and mental pictures of life after work.
The four result dimensions are:
- Preparation for Retirement (7-35) measures readiness and action, with Limited preparation (7-16), Developing preparation (17-30), and Well-prepared (31-35).
- Decision to Prepare for Retirement (8-40) measures whether you have decided retirement preparation is necessary; higher scores indicate a deliberate, active stance, while lower scores indicate postponement or passivity, with Passive/Undecided (8-16), Emerging Commitment (17-30), and Proactive Decision (31-40).
- Retirement Goals (4-20) measures clarity, with Unclear goals (4-9), Developing goals (10-18), and Clear goals (19-20).
- Retirement Representations (16-80) measures how clearly retirement is pictured, with Unclear or unformed (16-39), Developing picture (40-67), and Clear and defined (68-80).
Methodology and Scientific Basis
Responses use a five-point agreement format from Strongly disagree to Strongly agree. Items contrast active reflection-comparing finances, discussing retirement and imagining future roles-with delaying decisions or relying on later solutions. Results report four dimensions. Higher scores indicate active preparation, commitment to prepare, clearer goals or a defined retirement picture; lower scores can reflect passivity, unclear goals or uncertainty.
It is conceptually consistent with PRePS (Noone et al., 2010), the source instrument for retirement-planning processes. A 2024 adaptation and validation study by Drobysheva, Tarasov and Larionov is relevant to the construct and translation. Friedman and Scholnick’s planning framework adds psychological requirements, task demands and social-cultural context.
In practical terms, this works as an are you ready to retire quiz: contrasts between dimensions show what to discuss or plan next. Differences make priorities concrete-an unclear goal may call for reflection before detailed financial or health planning. The online questionnaire is not the validated PRePS edition; self-report can be influenced by circumstances, self-awareness and candor.
- Drobysheva, T. V., Tarasov, S. V., & Larionov, I. V. (2024). Retirement Planning in the Pre-Retirement Age: Initial Adaptation and Validation of the Questionnaire 'The Process of Retirement Planning Scale' by J. H. Noone, C. Stephens, and F. M. Alpass. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 17(2), 199-216. 10.17759/exppsy.2024170212
- Noone, J. H., Stephens, C., & Alpass, F. (2010). The Process of Retirement Planning Scale (PRePS): Development and Validation. Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 520-531. 10.1037/a0019512
- Friedman, S. L., & Scholnick, E. K. (1997). An Evolving Blueprint for Planning: Psychological Requirements, Task Characteristics, and Social-Cultural Influences. In S. L. Friedman & E. K. Scholnick (Eds.), The Developmental Psychology of Planning: Why, How, and When Do We Plan? (pp. 3-22). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Updated: