Tuckman Procrastination Scale (TPS-35) Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
- Strongly agree
- Agree
- Disagree
- Strongly disagree
Tuckman Procrastination Scale (TPS-35) Test - Description and methodology of the test
People who want to understand recurring delays, missed deadlines, or difficulty beginning unpleasant work may find the Tuckman Procrastination Scale (TPS-35) Test a useful self-report starting point. It frames procrastination as a pattern of task-related responses rather than a character flaw. As a procrastination assessment, it can help you notice where initiation, persistence, or time use becomes harder to manage.
What This Assessment Measures
These items examine procrastination as a recurring response to responsibilities, rather than a single late task. The Tuckman procrastination questionnaire covers important duties, disliked work, study, professional improvement, punctuality, excuses, and stopping when effort feels unpleasant. It also touches beliefs about deadlines, fairness, responsibility, and continuing despite discomfort.
The Tuckman Procrastination Scale ranges from 1-4. Higher scores indicate more pronounced procrastination; the bands are Low 1-2, Moderate 2.1-3, and High 3.1-4. The item themes are:
- Initiation and completion show how readily you start and finish obligations.
- Deadline behavior reflects postponement and last-minute working.
- Avoidance captures delay when tasks feel difficult, boring, or unpleasant.
- Persistence describes what happens when fatigue or setbacks make continuation harder.
Methodology and Evidence Base
The questionnaire uses four response choices: Strongly agree, Agree, Disagree, and Strongly disagree. Statements ask about familiar patterns such as delaying important work, waiting for deadlines, or stopping when effort becomes unpleasant. Answer for your usual behavior, not an unusually good or bad day, to give the summary clearer personal meaning.
Responses are combined into the displayed scale score. The questionnaire does not specify an item-by-item weighting rule, so interpret the result through its stated direction: higher values represent stronger procrastination tendencies, especially around self-organization and time management. This procrastination test describes a pattern, not every cause behind it.
The questionnaire is conceptually consistent with the published Tuckman Procrastination Scale from 1991, the instrument matching its central construct. Later psychometric studies examined that published measure in Turkish and Buenos Aires undergraduates. Those studies concern the published measure; they do not establish equivalence, norms, or validation for this online presentation.
Self-report is sensitive to memory, mood, self-criticism, and favorable self-presentation. Read the result alongside workload, sleep, motivation, and environmental demands; a high score indicates delay tendencies, not a diagnosis or fixed trait.
- Tuckman, B. W. (1991). The development and concurrent validity of the procrastination scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(2), 473-480. 10.1177/0013164491512022
- Uzun Ozer, B., Saçkes, M., & Tuckman, B. W. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Tuckman Procrastination Scale in a Turkish sample. Psychological Reports, 113(3), 874-884. 10.2466/03.20.PR0.113x28z7
- Tisocco, F., & Fernández Liporace, M. (2021). The Tuckman Procrastination Scale: Psychometric Features among Buenos Aires Undergraduates. Psychological Thought, 14(2), 444-466. 10.37708/psyct.v14i2.603
Updated: