Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
cbt

Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Test

Take the online Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Testhere. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
Understand how much you get stuck in repetitive, distressing thoughts in about 4 minutes. Get clear, actionable insights to guide targeted coping strategies and track change over time.
Start Online Test
Questions: 184 minutes
08:30
October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025
Material has been updated
October 2, 2025
Material has been published
30,421 view
1,863 completions
1,581 likes
Verified by Daniel Hall
Psychologist with 25 years of experience
Share
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

example score
7/12
Loneliness (L)
Assesses how strongly a person tends to dwell on feelings of loneliness and related thoughts.
Low
Moderate
High
35: Low | 69: Moderate | 1012: High
A score of 7 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not pronounced tendency to ruminate on loneliness-related experiences.
example score
6/12
Analysis (A)
Measures the tendency to reflect on low mood with some emotional distance rather than becoming absorbed in repetitive negative thinking.
Low analysis
Moderate analysis
High analysis
35: Low analysis | 68: Moderate analysis | 912: High analysis
A score of 6 falls in the Moderate analysis range, suggesting a balanced level of reflective distancing that may sometimes support constructive problem-focused thinking.
example score
15/20
Searching for Global Explanations (SfGE)
Measures how strongly a person tends to ruminate on setbacks by searching for broad, global causes and meanings.
Low
Moderate
High
59: Low | 1014: Moderate | 1520: High
A score of 15 falls in the High range, indicating a pronounced tendency to explain negative events through broad, global causes, which can reinforce unproductive repetitive thinking.
example score
21/28
Anergia (A)
Assesses how strongly a person tends to ruminate on tiredness and reduced energy.
Low
Moderate
High
713: Low | 1420: Moderate | 2128: High
A score of 21 falls in the High range, suggesting a pronounced focus on fatigue and low energy in repetitive thinking.
example score
53/72
Rumination (R)
Assesses the tendency toward persistent, repetitive thinking about feelings and problems that can interfere with constructive problem-solving.
Low
Moderate
High
1835: Low | 3654: Moderate | 5572: High
A score of 53 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable tendency toward repetitive, cyclical thinking that may sometimes make it harder to move from reflection to action.
Start Online Test
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Stuck in past thoughts
41%OF USERS
People who keep replaying upsetting events and want to know how strong their tendency to mentally “chew” on them really is.
Anxiety or low mood seekers
34%OF USERS
Those noticing anxiety or a drop in mood who suspect repetitive thinking is fueling it and want a quick check of rumination patterns.
Therapy-focused self trackers
25%OF USERS
Clients in counseling who want a clear baseline and a way to monitor whether targeted techniques are reducing unproductive looping thoughts.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Experiencing Loneliness (EL)
Experiencing Loneliness (EL)
Average
9.3
Normal range
810.6
min.
3
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Analysis (A)
Analysis (A)
Average
5.7
Normal range
4.56.9
min.
3
max.
12
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Searching for global explanations (Sfge)
Searching for global explanations (Sfge)
Average
11.2
Normal range
8.613.8
min.
5
max.
20
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Anergy (A)
Anergy (A)
Average
13.1
Normal range
9.616.6
min.
7
max.
28
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Rumination Scale (RS)
Rumination Scale (RS)
Average
39.2
Normal range
31.646.9
min.
18
max.
72
This curve shows how scores are typically distributed.
Once you complete the test, your result will appear on the scale so you can see how you compare.
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

    • Almost never
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • Almost always
    • Never
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • All the time
    • Never
    • Sometimes
    • Often
    • All the time
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES
About This Assessment

Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) Test - Symptoms and Signs

cbt
rumination

This self-report measure assesses a person’s tendency to engage in repetitive, persistent thinking about distress and its implications. The Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) is commonly used to characterize ruminative response styles associated with emotional distress.

It consists of 18 items and typically takes about 4 minutes to complete. Items query how individuals think or respond when feeling down or upset, supporting clinical case formulation and monitoring change over time. The measure is attributed to Sonja Lyubomirsky, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, and Jannay Morrow.

Scores from the Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS-18) are interpreted as an index of ruminative tendency rather than as a standalone diagnosis, and should be considered alongside clinical interview data and other validated measures as appropriate.

Author: Jannay Morrow, Sonja Lyubomirsky, Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Literature: Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1991.; Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Rumination reconsidered: A psychometric analysis. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2003.
Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment