Freudly+971 508685814hello@freudly.ai
Freudly
family

Sibling Rivalry Scale Test

Take the online Sibling Rivalry Scale Test - AI psychologist FreudlyYou can take Sibling Rivalry Scale Test here. Online version of a simple and accurate psychological test with interpretation.en
With 10 yes-or-no questions and a completion time of about 2 minutes, the Sibling Rivalry Scale Test offers a concise way to reflect on jealousy toward an older sister. The result can help you consider emotional reactions, relationship patterns, and possible areas for greater understanding.
Questions: 102 minutes
Sibling Rivalry Scale Test: sample question card
October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published
26,957 views
2,273 completions
1,858 likes
Daniel HallPsychologist · Test reviewer
1,858 likes
Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Jealousy Toward Older SisterJTOS
Measures how strongly a child feels jealousy and rivalry toward their older sister.
example score41/100
41/100Moderateexample score
0 – 30Low
31 – 60Moderate
61 – 100High
A score of 41 falls in the Moderate range, suggesting a noticeable but not especially unfavorable level of jealousy toward the older sister.
just completed the test
DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Parents of multiple kids
47%OF USERS
Parents use it to understand jealousy and attention fights between siblings and decide how to respond at home.
Child psychologists and counselors
34%OF USERS
Professionals use it as a quick screen to pinpoint sibling tension and plan family-focused support.
Teachers and school staff
19%OF USERS
Educators use it when a child shows conflict spillover at school and they need insight into family dynamics.
BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.
Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Shaded area — where most people score
Dot — the average
You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test
Degree of jealousy toward older sisterDojtos
You?
Average65.7
Typical rangeTypical49.6 – 81.7
Possible0 – 100
Featured On
SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

For each item on the questionnaire, the child must provide a specific response: yes or no.
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
    • Yes
    • No
WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

Sibling Rivalry Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

family
siblings

Anyone reflecting on family dynamics can use this questionnaire to consider how an older sister is imagined within a sibling relationship. The Sibling Rivalry Scale Test focuses on attitudes expressed through admiration, closeness, sharing, cooperation, and willingness to avoid complaints or interruption. For self-reflection, this sibling rivalry test provides a focused result rather than a complete account of family life.

What This Assessment Explores

The questions present ordinary situations involving an older sister, including taking her as an example, praising her to parents, respecting her homework, helping with chores, and sharing desirable things. The questionnaire examines the emotional position behind these imagined actions, so the older sister jealousy test reflects more than one isolated behavior.

The result is organized around one catalogue-defined dimension:

  • Jealousy Toward Older Sister (0-100) measures the child’s level of jealousy toward an older sister. Low covers 0-30, Moderate covers 31-60, and High covers 61-100; higher percentages indicate more pronounced rivalry and jealous attitudes, while scores above 60% are described as particularly unfavorable and potentially linked with significant relationship difficulties.

The item themes describe situations and attitudes, while the displayed scale supplies the interpretation of the resulting tendency. A higher result therefore follows the catalogue’s definition, even when individual prompts describe cooperation, admiration, or generosity.

Methodology and Scientific Basis

Each prompt uses a direct first-person statement with a Yes or No response. This format asks the respondent to choose between two clear positions instead of rating intensity or explaining circumstances. The questionnaire’s scoring procedure is presented through the displayed percentage-style result; no item-level weighting or reverse-scoring procedure is stated for this online version.

The item themes are conceptually consistent with Dunn and Kendrick’s (1982) treatment of affection, envy, and understanding between siblings, but the questionnaire is not an adaptation of that published work. Research by Volling, McElwain, and Miller (2002) places jealousy within the emotional context of sibling relationships, while Furman and Buhrmester (1985) and Dunn (1983) describe qualities and developmental features relevant to sibling interaction.

The result provides a structured sibling relationship assessment of the tendency defined by this questionnaire, rather than a complete profile of family dynamics. Because it relies on self-report and imagined situations, answers may reflect current mood, memory, social desirability, or limited self-awareness. The online version has no stated norms or standardization, so its bands organize reflection rather than establish clinical thresholds. It is a self-reflection tool, not a diagnostic measure.

Author: J. Dunn
Literature:
  • Dunn, Judy, and Carol Kendrick. Siblings: Love, Envy, and Understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
  • Volling, Brenda L., Nancy L. McElwain, and Alison L. Miller. Emotion Regulation in Context: The Jealousy Complex between Young Siblings and Its Relations with Child and Family Characteristics. Child Development, 73(2), 581-600, 2002. 10.1111/1467-8624.00425
  • Furman, Wyndol, and Duane Buhrmester. Children's Perceptions of the Qualities of Sibling Relationships. Child Development, 56(2), 448-461, 1985. 10.2307/1129733
  • Dunn, Judy. Sibling Relationships in Early Childhood. Child Development, 54(4), 787-811, 1983. 10.2307/1129886

Updated:

Popular tests
Comments
Leave a Comment