Home1
Psychological tests2
PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale3

PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale Test

With 36 questions and a seven-minute completion time, the PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale Test explores how workplace situations involving challenge, loss, uncertainty, control, and emotional tension are experienced. Results can reveal patterns in perceived stressfulness and available coping resources, supporting focused self-reflection about situations that may require attention.

Questions: 367 minutes

PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale: situation and reply bubbles

October 2, 2025October 2, 2025Material has been updatedOctober 2, 2025Material has been published

34,642 views

2,625 completions

2,192 likes

Daniel Hall Psychologist · Test reviewer

2,192 likes

Scale Explorer

How the Scales are Structured

Challenge SituationCS

Measures how stressful work situations feel when they demand substantial effort to overcome (e.g., urgent problems, conflicts, or technical issues).

example score10/42

10/42Low stressexample score

6 – 17Low stress

18 – 29Moderate stress

30 – 42High stress

A score of 10 falls in the Low stress range, suggesting challenge situations are currently perceived as relatively manageable and not strongly strain-inducing.

Threat of Loss SituationToLS

Measures how strongly you experience stress in work situations involving a potential loss (e.g., resources, status, or results).

example score25/42

25/42Moderate sensitivityexample score

6 – 17Low sensitivity

18 – 29Moderate sensitivity

30 – 42High sensitivity

A score of 25 falls in the Moderate sensitivity range, suggesting a noticeable but not extreme stress response to situations where losses may occur.

Loss SituationLS

Measures how stressful situations involving loss of time, resources, or material assets feel to the individual at work.

example score30/42

30/42Highexample score

6 – 17Low

18 – 29Moderate

30 – 42High

A score of 30 falls in the High range, indicating that loss-related events are associated with a marked level of perceived stress for this person.

UncertaintyU

Measures how unpredictable and open-ended a work situation feels, affecting how easily outcomes can be anticipated.

example score19/42

19/42Moderate uncertaintyexample score

6 – 17Low uncertainty

18 – 29Moderate uncertainty

30 – 42High uncertainty

A score of 19 indicates moderate uncertainty, suggesting situations are sometimes hard to forecast but still have some predictable structure.

ProductivityP

This scale measures the internal resources a person can draw on to cope effectively with work-related stressors.

example score23/42

23/42Moderate resourcesexample score

6 – 17Low resources

18 – 30Moderate resources

31 – 42High resources

A score of 23 falls in the Moderate resources range, suggesting a fair capacity to manage stressful situations with some variability depending on the demands.

UncontrollabilityU

Measures how uncertain a person feels about having enough control and resources to manage stressful work situations.

example score28/42

28/42Moderate uncontrollabilityexample score

6 – 17Low uncontrollability

18 – 29Moderate uncontrollability

30 – 42High uncontrollability

A score of 28 indicates moderate uncontrollability, suggesting a notable but not extreme sense that the situation may be hard to influence or manage.

Personal SignificancePS

Measures how important a work situation is perceived to be for the individual’s future.

example score29/42

29/42Moderate significanceexample score

6 – 17Low significance

18 – 29Moderate significance

30 – 42High significance

A score of 29 indicates the situation is viewed as moderately significant, suggesting it matters to future outcomes but is not experienced as highly pivotal.

Emotional TensionET

This scale measures how much emotional strain a person feels and how limited their internal coping resources seem in stressful work situations.

example score30/42

30/42High tensionexample score

6 – 17Low tension

18 – 29Moderate tension

30 – 42High tension

A score of 30 indicates high emotional tension, suggesting the situation is experienced as strongly taxing with fewer perceived coping resources available.

RecurrenceR

Measures how frequently stressful work situations recur over time.

example score33/42

33/42High repetitionexample score

6 – 17Low repetition

18 – 29Moderate repetition

30 – 42High repetition

A score of 33 indicates high repetition, suggesting stressful situations are occurring frequently and may accumulate impact over time.

Overall Stressfulness IndexOSI

Measures the average perceived stressfulness of typical workplace situations to indicate overall vulnerability versus resilience to stress.

example score13/42

13/42Low stress sensitivityexample score

6 – 17Low stress sensitivity

18 – 29Moderate stress sensitivity

30 – 42High stress sensitivity

A score of 13 falls in the Low stress sensitivity range, suggesting you generally perceive common work situations as less stressful than most.

just completed the test

DATA-BASED USER COHORTS

Who Usually Takes This Test?

Shop Floor Employees

41%OF USERS

Operators, technicians, and line workers take it to pinpoint which daily production pressures, safety demands, and technical issues trigger the most stress.

Sales and Account Staff

34%OF USERS

Sales reps and account managers use it to rate how deadlines, customer conflict, targets, and constant communication affect their stress levels.

Team Leads and HR

25%OF USERS

Supervisors, HR, and workplace psychologists take it to map team stress hotspots and decide where to adjust workload, processes, or support.

BASED ON AGGREGATED, ANONYMIZED DATA FROM TENS OF THOUSANDS OF FREUDLY USERS.

Benchmarking

See How You Compare

Once you complete the test, your results are compared with real-world data from people in your country.
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.

Shaded area — where most people score

Dot — the average

You — your score lands on each curve after the test— your score, after the test

The “call” situationT“s

You?

Average17.3

Typical rangeTypical11.4 – 23.2

Possible6 – 42

"Threat of Loss" Situation"oLS

You?

Average26.6

Typical rangeTypical20 – 33.2

Possible6 – 42

The "Loss" SituationT"S

You?

Average19.1

Typical rangeTypical14.4 – 23.8

Possible6 – 42

UncertaintyU

You?

Average22.6

Typical rangeTypical16.3 – 28.9

Possible6 – 42

ProductivityP

You?

Average27.6

Typical rangeTypical22.1 – 33.2

Possible6 – 42

UncontrollabilityU

You?

Average19.4

Typical rangeTypical14.2 – 24.6

Possible6 – 42

Personal significancePs

You?

Average32

Typical rangeTypical27.5 – 36.6

Possible6 – 42

Emotional tensionEt

You?

Average20.9

Typical rangeTypical15.9 – 25.9

Possible6 – 42

RepetitivenessR

You?

Average16.1

Typical rangeTypical11.3 – 20.8

Possible6 – 42

Overall Stress IndexOSI

You?

Average26.5

Typical rangeTypical20.5 – 32.4

Possible6 – 42

Featured On

SAMPLE QUESTIONS

Example Questions From the Test

You will be presented with several professionally challenging work-related situations and rating scales to assess your experiences, described by two opposite endpoints. There are no “good” or “bad” answers; responses reflect individual differences in how people react. Please indicate the extent to which your personal experiences or attitudes apply to the situations listed below.

- (1) The situation occurs rarely
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
- (5)
- (6)
- (7) The situation occurs often
- (1) I feel calm
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
- (5)
- (6)
- (7) I feel treated unfairly and irritated
- (1) The situation occurs rarely
- (2)
- (3)
- (4)
- (5)
- (6)
- (7) The situation occurs frequently

These are 3 of the 36 real questions — the rest appear in the test. No sign-up needed to start.

WHAT THE TEST MEASURES

PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test

arrange

work stress

People examining why particular work situations feel disproportionately taxing can use the PTSD Stressfulness Rating Scale Test as a structured self-report. It is intended for employees, supervisors, and other adults reflecting on workplace demands. A workplace stress assessment can show which appraisals create strain and where perceived coping resources seem stronger or weaker.

What This Test Measures

Scenarios cover overtime, unfairness, absence, communication and rudeness. The PTSD stressfulness scale separates stressors from coping:

Challenge Situation (6-42) rates demands: Low stress 6-17; Moderate stress 18-29; High stress 30-42. Threat of Loss Situation (6-42) rates distress: Low sensitivity 6-17; Moderate sensitivity 18-29; High sensitivity 30-42.
Loss Situation (6-42) rates loss stress: Low 6-17; Moderate 18-29; High 30-42. Uncertainty (6-42) rates unpredictability: Low uncertainty 6-17; Moderate uncertainty 18-29; High uncertainty 30-42.
Productivity (6-42) reflects resources: Low resources 6-17; Moderate resources 18-30; High resources 31-42. Uncontrollability (6-42) reflects reduced control: Low uncontrollability 6-17; Moderate uncontrollability 18-29; High uncontrollability 30-42.
Personal Significance (6-42) reflects future importance: Low significance 6-17; Moderate significance 18-29; High significance 30-42. Emotional Tension (6-42) reflects strain: Low tension 6-17; Moderate tension 18-29; High tension 30-42.
Recurrence (6-42) reflects frequency: Low repetition 6-17; Moderate repetition 18-29; High repetition 30-42. Overall Stressfulness Index (6-42) averages stressfulness and vulnerability: Low stress sensitivity 6-17; Moderate stress sensitivity 18-29; High stress sensitivity 30-42.

Methodology and Evidence Base

Each scenario is rated through seven-point bipolar response options. The endpoints vary by question: rare to frequent occurrence, calm to tense or irritated feeling, beneficial to harmful impact, no interference to reduced productivity, and spontaneous improvement to a need for intervention. This structure captures appraisal of frequency, meaning, consequences, control, and emotional response rather than counting events alone.

The method is conceptually consistent with the PTS Workplace Stressfulness Rating Scale described by Vodopyanova (2009), not presented as an adaptation of that instrument. Vodopyanova and Starchenkova (2008) describe the transactional approach to stressful professional situations, while Saprykina (2015) examines cognitive appraisal in stressful working contexts. In practice, the stressfulness rating scale reads higher values as greater stress, sensitivity, recurrence, tension, or uncontrollability; Productivity is different because higher values indicate more available coping resources.

Because the online profile uses self-report and descriptive bands rather than established clinical cutoffs, results can shift with current workload, response style, and self-awareness and should be interpreted as a contextual profile, not a diagnosis.

Author: Edna B. Foa

Literature:

Vodopyanova, N. E. (2009). Psychodiagnostics of Stress. St. Petersburg: Piter, pp. 90-95. ISBN 978-5-388-00542-7.
Saprykina, Y. A. (2015). Correlation Between Cognitive Appraisal of Stressful Working Situations and Professional Aptitude of Insurance Agents. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, no. 2, pp. 301-310. DOI 10.17805/zpu.2015.2.32.
Vodopyanova, N. E., and Starchenkova, E. S. (2008). Transactional Approach to the Study of Stressful Situations in Professional Activities. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Series 12: Psychology, Sociology, Pedagogy, issue 2, pp. 47-58.

Updated: 2025-10-02