Differences Recognition Scale Test

How the Scales are Structured
Who Usually Takes This Test?
See How You Compare
Below is a preview of how scores are typically distributed across each scale.
Example Questions From the Test
- Yes
- No
- Yes
- No
- Adoptive parents’ feelings will be different
- Adoptive parents’ feelings are the same as biological parents’
Differences Recognition Scale Test - Description and methodology of the test
For readers reflecting on family life, the Differences Recognition Scale Test offers a structured way to consider how people view adoption-related experiences. It focuses on whether differences are acknowledged, denied, or considered in context, rather than treating one family form as inherently better. The result can help readers examine adoption perspectives alongside assumptions about parenthood, identity, and family life.
What This Assessment Explores
The items ask about situations in which adoptive and biological family experiences may be seen as alike or different. They cover anticipated feelings, relatives’ reactions, resemblance, illness, school, adolescence, adulthood, grandchildren, conversations about origins, family rituals, and thoughts about a child’s biological parents. They also ask about distinctive joys, concerns, and moments of adoption-related self-awareness.
The questions examine family differences by asking whether someone recognizes that family relationships can share emotional bonds while also carrying experiences linked to adoption. It suits anyone reflecting on adoptive family life or related beliefs; the questions do not judge family functioning.
Results are organized into one dimension:
- The Differences Recognition scale, scored from 0 to 22, shows how readily a person acknowledges and considers differences between people; Low (0-2) indicates a low level, Medium (3-9) a moderate level, and High (10-22) a high level.
Methodology and Evidence Base
Responses use yes/no items, paired choices about whether adoptive and biological parents might feel differently, one frequency item with three response options, and one additional three-option item. Together, these formats address beliefs and reactions to family situations.
The questionnaire combines recorded answers into one displayed score reflecting adoption differences. Because it does not state a universal point value for every answer, item-level weighting should not be inferred from the displayed result.
The closest conceptual source is Acknowledgement of Differences (Lo and Grotevant, 2020), which links recognition of adoption-related differences with adoptive-parent cognitions. Lo, Cashen, and Grotevant (2021) discuss open-adoption cognitions, while Kirk’s Shared Fate theory (1964) provides context. They support interpretation but do not establish this questionnaire as a direct adaptation or transfer their findings to it.
Higher results indicate greater reported willingness to acknowledge differences; lower results indicate more denial or minimization. Current circumstances, social desirability, and self-awareness can shape self-report. The result is a structured self-report reflection of perspective, not a clinical assessment, and it is best read alongside the particular adoption-related experiences the respondent has in mind.
- Lo, Albert Y. H., and Harold D. Grotevant. “Adoptive Parenting Cognitions: Acknowledgement of Differences as a Predictor of Adolescents’ Attachment to Parents.” Parenting, 20(2), 83-107, 2020. 10.1080/15295192.2019.1694826
- Lo, Albert Y. H., Krystal K. Cashen, and Harold D. Grotevant. “Adoptive Parenting Cognitions in the Era of Open Adoption: Is Shared Fate Theory Still Relevant?” Family Relations, 70(4), 1117-1131, 2021. 10.1111/fare.12557
- Kirk, H. David. Shared Fate: A Theory of Adoption and Mental Health. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
Updated: